Patient Care Competency in Emergency Medicine Graduate Medical Education: Results of a Consensus Group on Patient Care

"Patient Care" is the first listed core competency of the six new core competencies recently formulated by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and, arguably, the most important. To assist emergency medicine (EM) program directors in incorporating and assessing this competency, the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors (CORD-EM) held a consensus conference in March 2002. Definitions of this competency were generated that are specific for the training of practitioners in EM. These built upon the ACGME base definition, but include elements unique to or critically important in EM. In addition, all of the ACGME assessment tools were examined and prioritized for use in assessing the competency of EM residents in the area of patient care. Suggestions for an implementation process are also described.     

The evolving practice of nuclear cardiology: Results from the 2011 ASNC member survey

Background

Today??s imaging laboratories face challenges including reimbursement, prior authorization, and accreditation standards. The impact on the practice of nuclear cardiology in the United States is unknown. We conducted a survey of ASNC members to provide a snapshot of nuclear cardiology imaging laboratories in 2011.

Methods and Results

The survey identified practice patterns including personnel, volumes, protocols used, and laboratory characteristics. We employed random sampling methodology stratified geographically. The response rate was 19.5% (73/374 laboratories). A non-random survey conducted in 2001 of 25 laboratories served as a comparator. A total of 73 laboratories, representing 202 physicians and 177 technologists responded. The reported median procedural volume was 1,225 studies annually; 88.9% of laboratories were accredited. Compared with 2001, dual isotope imaging protocol use dropped from 72% to 15.6%. Five markers of quality were surveyed. Half of laboratories use the American College of Cardiology??s Appropriate Use Criteria, 61% used segmental scoring, and 32% provided guidance on post-test therapeutic management. 89% perform catheterization correlations while only 33% implemented radiation dose tracking.

Conclusions

This survey of ASNC members provides critical information on nuclear cardiology practice to better target and service our members?? needs. These data can prove invaluable to target educational needs and inform healthcare policy of contemporary nuclear cardiology practice.     

Gd‐EOB‐DTPA‐enhanced MR imaging: Prediction of hepatic fibrosis stages using liver contrast enhancement index and liver‐to‐spleen volumetric ratio

Purpose:

To develop and evaluate a quantitative parameter for staging hepatic fibrosis by contrast enhancement signal intensity and morphological measurements from gadoxetic acid (Gd‐EOB‐DTPA)‐enhanced MR imaging.

Materials and Methods:

MR images were obtained in 93 patients; 75 patients had histopathologically proven hepatic fibrosis and 18 patients who had healthy livers were evaluated. The liver‐to‐muscle signal intensity ratio (SI_post = SIliver/SImuscle), contrast enhancement index (CEI = SIpost/SIpre), and liver‐to‐spleen volumetric ratio (VR = Vliver/Vspleen) were evaluated for staging hepatic fibrosis.

Results:

VR was most strongly correlated with fibrosis stage (7.21; r = ?0.83; P < 0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve demonstrated by linear regression formula generated by VR and CEI in predicting fibrous scores were 100%, 73%, and 0.91, respectively, for the detection of hepatic fibrosis F1 or greater (≥ F1),100%, 87%, and 0.96 for ≥ F2, 74%, 98%, and 0.93 for ≥ F3 and 91%, 100%, and 0.97 for F4.

Conclusion:

The liver‐to‐spleen volumetric ratio and contrast enhancement index were reliable biomarkers for the staging of hepatic fibrosis on Gd‐EOB‐DTPA‐enhanced MR imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012;36:1148–1153. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.