Treating to target patients with primary hyperlipidaemia: comparison of the effects of ATOrvastatin and ROSuvastatin (the ATOROS study)

OBJECTIVES: In a 24-week, open-label, randomized, parallel-group study, we compared the efficacy and metabolic effects, beyond low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering, of atorvastatin (ATV) and rosuvastatin (RSV) in cardiovascular disease-free subjects with primary hyperlipidaemia, treated to an LDL-C target (130 mg/dL). METHODS: After a 6-week dietary lead-in period, patients were randomized to RSV 10 mg/day (n = 60) or ATV 20 mg/day (n = 60). After 6 weeks on treatment the dose of the statin was increased (to RSV 20 mg/day or ATV 40 mg/day) if the treatment goal was not achieved. A control group of healthy volunteers (n = 60) was also included for the validation of baseline serum and urinary laboratory parameters. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients reaching the LDL-C goal; secondary outcomes were changes in lipid and non-lipid metabolic parameters. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients (75.0%) in the RSV-treated group and 43 (71.7%) in the ATV-treated group achieved the treatment target at the initial dose. Both regimens were generally well tolerated and there were no withdrawals due to treatment-related serious adverse events. Similar significant reductions in total cholesterol, LDL-C, apolipoprotein (apo) B, triglycerides, apoB/apoA1 ratio, fibrinogen and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels were seen. RSV had a significant high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)-raising effect and showed a trend towards increasing apoA1 levels. Glycaemic control and renal function parameters were not influenced by statin therapy. ATV, but not RSV, showed a significant hypouricaemic effect. CONCLUSIONS: RSV and ATV were equally efficacious in achieving LDL-C treatment goals in patients with primary hyperlipidaemia at the initial dose and following dose titration. RSV seems to have a significantly higher HDL-C-raising effect, while ATV lowers serum uric acid levels.     

Occipital neuralgia secondary to respiratory tract infection

Occipital neuralgia is an extracranial pain that may be confused with other headaches. It can be attributed to multiple causes. The authors report the case of a 55-year-old woman suffering from right occipital neuralgia secondary to respiratory tract infection that began 6 days before the pain started. The patient suffered from a sharp and burning pain with paroxysms in the right occipital region and at the top of the right ear. Sensation was decreased in the affected area, and hypersensitivity to touch and cold water was also noted. Tinel's sign was present, and local anesthetic block produced pain relief. The combination of gabapentin and amitriptyline did not provide significant pain relief but led to marked adverse effects. Carbamazepine (300 mg/d) was required for pain control. A month later the patient appeared totally pain-free. The treatment was continued for 3 months, and the patient remained pain-free over a subsequent follow-up period of more than 6 months. Thus, in the case of occipital pain, a careful assessment of symptoms and a thorough history are necessary to obtain the correct diagnosis and to choose the appropriate treatment plan.     

Primary desmoid tumor of the posterior mediastinum

We describe a unique case of a de novo desmoid tumor of the posterior mediastinum in a 21-year-old nulligravida. The tumor recurred twice despite its histologically confirmed radical extirpations. Because of the aggressive local behavior of desmoid tumors and their unusual locations, which prevent wide excision margins, we favor the early consideration of adjuvant therapy.     

LDL cholesterol estimation in patients with the metabolic syndrome

Background  

The Friedewald formula (LDL-F) for the estimation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations is the most often used formula in clinical trials and clinical practice. However, much concern has been raised as to whether this formula is applicable in all patient populations such as the presence of chylomicronaemia and/or hypertriglyceridaemia. The aim of the present study was to evaluate various LDL cholesterol calculation formulas as well as LDL cholesterol levels provided by the Lipoprint LDL System (LDL-L) in patients with the metabolic syndrome (MetSyn).     

1-Year All-Comers Analysis of the Eluvia Drug-Eluting Stent for Long Femoropopliteal Lesions After Suboptimal Angioplasty

Objectives

The aim of this study was to assess the performance of the fluoropolymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in long femoropopliteal lesions.

Safety considerations with fenofibrate/simvastatin combination

Introduction: Fenofibrate/simvastatin combination is useful for patients with mixed dyslipidemia. Aim of this review is to critically present the safety aspects of the fenofibrate/simvastatin combination.

Areas covered: Current evidence regarding the adverse effects of fenofibrate/simvastatin combination is critically presented based on the results of large randomized controlled trials and other relevant studies. Additionally, clinical pharmacology, drug interactions and the effects of fenofibrate and simvastatin on metabolic variables and cardiovascular risk are briefly described.

Expert opinion: Large randomized clinical trials show that the combined administration of fenofibrate with simvastatin is not associated with significantly increased incidence of serious adverse events compared with simvastatin monotherapy. The incidence of rhabdomyolysis is slightly increased with fibrate/statin combination compared with monotherapy but the actual risk is very low. Although fenofibrate increases creatinine and homocysteine serum levels, the incidence of diabetic nephropathy and thrombotic events was not significantly increased with fenofibrate/simvastatin combination compared with simvastatin monotherapy in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Lipid trial. Furthermore, a decrease in albuminuria was observed with fenofibrate in the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) and ACCORD Lipid trials. Overall, the combined administration of fenofibrate with simvastatin appears to be safe, unless clinicians give fenofibrate/simvastatin combination to patients with predisposing risk factors for the occurrence of adverse events.     

Adverse Effects of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are a class of injective anti-diabetic drugs that improve glycemic control and many other atherosclerosis-related parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, the use of this relatively new class of drugs may be associated with certain adverse effects. Concerns have been expressed regarding the effects of these drugs on pancreatic and thyroid tissue, since animal studies and analyses of drug databases indicate an association of GLP-1 receptor agonists with pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer, and thyroid cancer. However, several meta-analyses failed to confirm a cause-effect relation between GLP-1 receptor agonists and the development of these adverse effects. One benefit of GLP-1 receptor agonists is that they do not cause hypoglycemia when combined with metformin or thiazolidinediones, but the dose of concomitant sulphonylurea or insulin may have to be decreased to reduce the risk of hypoglycemic episodes. On the other hand, several case reports have linked the use of these drugs, mainly exenatide, with the occurrence of acute kidney injury, primarily through hemodynamic derangement due to nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. The most common symptoms associated with the use of GLP-1 receptor agonists are gastrointestinal symptoms, mainly nausea. Other common adverse effects include injection site reactions, headache, and nasopharyngitis, but these effects do not usually result in discontinuation of the drug. Current evidence shows that GLP-1 receptor agonists have no negative effects on the cardiovascular risk of patients with T2D. Thus, GLP-1 receptor agonists appear to have a favorable safety profile, but ongoing trials will further assess their cardiovascular effects. The aim of this review is to analyze critically the available data regarding adverse events of GLP-1 receptor agonists in different anatomic systems published in Pubmed and Scopus. Whenever possible, certain differences between GLP-1 receptor agonists are described. The review also provides the reader with structured data that compare the rates of the most common adverse effects for each of the various GLP-1 receptor agonists.