Why do some trauma patients die while others survive? A matched-pair analysis based on data from Trauma Register DGU®

Purpose: The mortality rate for severely injured patients with the injury severity score (ISS) 16 has decreased in Germany. There is robust evidence that mortality is influenced not only by the acute trauma itself but also by physical health, age and sex. The aim of this study was to identify other possible influences on the mortality of severely injured patients. Methods: In a matched-pair analysis of data from Trauma Register DGU®, non-surviving patients from Germany between 2009 and 2014 with an ISS 16 were compared with surviving matching partners. Matching was performed on the basis of age, sex, physical health, injury pattern, trauma mechanism, conscious state at the scene of the accident based on the Glasgow coma scale, and the presence of shock on arrival at the emergency room. Results: We matched two homogeneous groups, each of which consisted of 657 patients (535 male, average age 37 years). There was no significant difference in the vital parameters at the scene of the accident, the length of the pre-hospital phase, the type of transport (ground or air), pre-hospital fluid management and amounts, ISS, initial care level, the length of the emergency room stay, the care received at night or from on-call personnel during the weekend, the use of abdominal sonographic imaging, the type of X-ray imaging used, and the percentage of patients who developed sepsis. We found a significant difference in the new injury severity score, the frequency of multi-organ failure, hemoglobine at admission, base excess and international normalized ratio in the emergency room, the type of accident (fall or road traffic accident), the pre-hospital intubation rate, reanimation, in-hospital fluid management, the frequency of transfusion, tomography (whole-body computed tomography), and the necessity of emergency intervention. Conclusion: Previously postulated factors such as the level of care and the length of the emergency room stay did not appear to have a significant influence in this study. Further studies should be conducted to analyse the identified factors with a view to optimising the treatment of severely injured patients. Our study shows that there are significant factors that can predict or influence the mortality of severely injured patients.     

Prospective evaluation of intra-observer variability of the hydronephrosis index in sonographic examination of 44 patients with acute renal colic

Purpose

The aim of our prospective designed study was to confirm the intra-observer agreement of assessments of the hydronephrosis index (HI) with a sonographic technique that potentially provides additional information in patients with acute renal colic (ARC).

Methods

Sonographic measurement of HI and valuation of common clinical criteria were performed in 44 consecutive patients presenting with unilateral stone-related ARC. HI of colic side was recorded twice in predefined time intervals. Intra-observer agreement was evaluated with the Spearman’s rank correlation/rho (ρ) for attributive-metric characteristics. Data of HI-measurement on the colic side were compared with data of the unaffected side using t test.

Results

Intra-observer agreement was significant for HI in the colic side (ρ = 0.918, p < 0.001) and in the unaffected side (ρ = 0.826, p < 0.001). The mean HI between colic and unaffected side differed significantly on the first evaluation (85.2 vs. 93.7, respectively; p < 0.001) and on the second evaluation (85.1 vs. 93.6, respectively; p < 0.001) as well.

Conclusions

The HI method is a slightly feasible examination method in patients presenting with stone-related renal colic. Moreover, it offers a solid discrimination between obstruction and non-obstruction. Our prospective trial illustrates HI as a reproducible method with a high-grade intra-observer agreement. However, potential change of values under medical expulsive therapy and coherency with the functionality of the obstructed kidney may lead to bias and therefore remain to be analyzed. Further studies to specify exact thresholds for this method and to state our findings are required.     

In vivo monitoring of implant osseointegration in a rabbit model using acoustic sound analysis

Implant osseointegration can currently only be assessed reliably post mortem. A novel method that relies on the principle of acoustic sound analysis was developed to enable examination of the longitudinal progress of osseointegration. The method is based on a magnetic sphere inside a hollow cylinder of the implant. By excitation using an external magnetic field, collision of the sphere inside the implant produces a sound signal. Custom‐made titanium implants equipped thusly were inserted in each lateral femoral epicondyle of 20 New Zealand White Rabbits. Two groups were investigated: Uncoated, machined surface versus antiadhesive surface; and calcium phosphate‐coated surface versus antiadhesive surface. The sound analysis was performed postoperatively and weekly. After 4 weeks, the animals were euthanized, and the axial pull‐out strengths of the implants were determined. A significant increase in the central frequency was observed for the loose implants (mean pull‐out strength 21.1 ± 16.9 N), up to 6.4 kHz over 4 weeks. In comparison, the central frequency of the osseointegrated implants (105.2 ± 25.3 N) dropped to its initial value. The presented method shows potential for monitoring the osseointegration of different implant surfaces and could considerably reduce the number of animals needed for experiments. © 2014 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 32:606–612, 2014.     

Bild gebende Verfahren in der Unfallchirurgie – Konsensuskonferenz

Trauma und Berufskrankheit - Ziel der Konsensuskonferenz war es, den aktuellen Wissensstand zur Indikationsstellung Bild gebender Verfahren in der Unfallchirurgie für die Regionen Hand, Knie...     

Outcomes of transoral laser microsurgery and transoral robotic surgery in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

ObjectiveTransoral robotic surgery (TORS) has evolved to a standard therapy modality for oropharyngeal carcinoma, especially in T1/ T2 tumors involving the base of the tongue due to its advantages compared with open surgery. However, knowledge about its benefits compared with transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) are scarce. This study compares oncological and functional results of TLM or TORS in the treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).MethodsThis retrospective analysis comprises all patients with OPSCC treated with TLM (n = 30) or TORS (n = 24) between April 2003 and May 2018 (follow-up 43 ± 38.3 months). Both treatment groups (TLM and TORS) were comparable in terms of the stage of the disease, prognosis-determining factors, and adjuvant therapy modalities.ResultsThere were no significant differences regarding to the resection status (p = 0.272), the rate of local- (p = 0.834) and distant- recurrence (p = 0.416), with a disease-free survival of 86.7 % and 87.5 %, respectively (p = 0.892). In addition, we could not confirm any differences regarding to operating time (p = 0.860), intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.660), inpatient stay (p = 0.585) and postoperative bleeding rate (p = 0.245). The frequency of tracheostomy and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy between both groups is comparable, with a longer duration of tube feeding in patients who have received TLM (p = 0.030).ConclusionIn conclusion, TORS allows for similar oncological outcomes compared with TLM at comparable perioperative risks. The postoperative swallowing function may benefit from TORS.