Radiologic diagnosis of oat cell cancer in a high-risk screened population

A screening program of 10,040 cigarette-smoking men over 45 years of age was undertaken in an attempt to achieve earlier diagnosis, thereby increasing the cure rate, of oat cell lung cancer. Of the 155 men who were found to have lung cancer, 27 (17%) had confirmed oat cell cancer. Only one case was diagnosed at the first examination. The other 26 cases (called incidence cancer) were diagnosed by subsequent examinations. In 24 of the 26 patients, the tumor was not found until it was advanced (Stage III), and of these patients, only one is alive at 21 months follow-up. Two tumors were diagnosed as oat cell carcinoma at an early stage (Stage I), and both patients are alive with no evidence of disease at seven and 24 months. The screening program used in this study did not succeed in detecting oat cell cancer at an early stage.     

Validity of self-reported smoking status among participants in a lung cancer screening trial.

Lung cancer remains a devastating disease associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Recent research has suggested that lung cancer screening with spiral computed tomography scans might reduce lung cancer mortality. Studies of lung cancer screening have also suggested that significant numbers of participants quit smoking after screening. However, most have relied solely on self-reported smoking behavior, which may be less accurate among participants in lung cancer screening. To assess the validity of self-reported smoking status among participants in a lung cancer screening trial, this study compared self-reported smoking status against urinary cotinine levels. The sample included 55 consecutive participants enrolled in a randomized clinical trial comparing annual spiral computed tomography and chest X-ray for lung cancer screening. Participants were a mean of 59 years of age and predominantly Caucasian (96%) and male (55%). Self-reported smoking status was assessed before and after participants learned of the purpose of the biochemical verification study. Using urinary cotinine as the "gold standard," the sensitivity and specificity of self-reported smoking status were 91% and 95%, respectively (kappa = 0.85, P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval = 0.71-0.99). Total misclassification rate was 7%. However, three of the four misclassified participants reported concurrent use of nicotine replacement strategies. Eliminating these cases from the analysis revealed sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 95% (kappa = 0.96, P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval = 0.88-1.00). In conclusion, self-reported smoking status among participants in a lung cancer screening trial was highly consistent with urinary cotinine test results.