Apport des outils de jugement clinique structuré pour la mise en place d’un programme de soins individualisé des auteurs de violences sexuelles

Objectives

It has been well established that standardised evaluation tools better predict violence or sexual recidivism risk than general clinical examination only (Monahan, 1984 ; Pham and Réveillère, 2015). Several specific scales have been validated, but their use is not widespread in France despite their clinical interest. In particular, clinical structured judgment tools such as HCR-20 (Webster et al., 1997) and RSVP (Hart et al., 2003) are easy to implement in clinical settings, especially since their predictive power is enhanced by a multiprofessionnal scoring (Ducro, 2009).