Procoagulant activity in hemostasis and thrombosis: Virchow's triad revisited

Virchow's triad is traditionally invoked to explain pathophysiologic mechanisms leading to thrombosis, alleging concerted roles for abnormalities in blood composition, vessel wall components, and blood flow in the development of arterial and venous thrombosis. Given the tissue-specific bleeding observed in hemophilia patients, it may be instructive to consider the principles of Virchow's triad when investigating mechanisms operant in hemostatic disorders as well. Blood composition (the function of circulating blood cells and plasma proteins) is the most well studied component of the triad. For example, increased levels of plasma procoagulant proteins such as prothrombin and fibrinogen are established risk factors for thrombosis, whereas deficiencies in plasma factors VIII and IX result in bleeding (hemophilia A and B, respectively). Vessel wall (cellular) components contribute adhesion molecules that recruit circulating leukocytes and platelets to sites of vascular damage, tissue factor, which provides a procoagulant signal of vascular breach, and a surface upon which coagulation complexes are assembled. Blood flow is often characterized by 2 key variables: shear rate and shear stress. Shear rate affects several aspects of coagulation, including transport rates of platelets and plasma proteins to and from the injury site, platelet activation, and the kinetics of fibrin monomer formation and polymerization. Shear stress modulates adhesion rates of platelets and expression of adhesion molecules and procoagulant activity on endothelial cells lining the blood vessels. That no one abnormality in any component of Virchow's triad fully predicts coagulopathy a priori suggests coagulopathies are complex, multifactorial, and interactive. In this review, we focus on contributions of blood composition, vascular cells, and blood flow to hemostasis and thrombosis, and suggest that cross-talk among the 3 components of Virchow's triad is necessary for hemostasis and determines propensity for thrombosis or bleeding. Investigative models that permit interplay among these components are necessary to understand the operant pathophysiology, and effectively treat and prevent thrombotic and bleeding disorders.     

Plasma fibronectin supports hemostasis and regulates thrombosis

Plasma fibronectin (pFn) has long been suspected to be involved in hemostasis; however, direct evidence has been lacking. Here, we demonstrated that pFn is vital to control bleeding in fibrinogen-deficient mice and in WT mice given anticoagulants. At the site of vessel injury, pFn was rapidly deposited and initiated hemostasis, even before platelet accumulation, which is considered the first wave of hemostasis. This pFn deposition was independent of fibrinogen, von Willebrand factor, β3 integrin, and platelets. Confocal and scanning electron microscopy revealed pFn integration into fibrin, which increased fibrin fiber diameter and enhanced the mechanical strength of clots, as determined by thromboelastography. Interestingly, pFn promoted platelet aggregation when linked with fibrin but inhibited this process when fibrin was absent. Therefore, pFn may gradually switch from supporting hemostasis to inhibiting thrombosis and vessel occlusion following the fibrin gradient that decreases farther from the injured endothelium. Our data indicate that pFn is a supportive factor in hemostasis, which is vital under both genetic and therapeutic conditions of coagulation deficiency. By interacting with fibrin and platelet β3 integrin, pFn plays a self-limiting regulatory role in thrombosis, suggesting pFn transfusion may be a potential therapy for bleeding disorders, particularly in association with anticoagulant therapy.     

Perceived discrimination,psychological distress and health

Racism and discrimination can have significant implications for health, through complex biopsychosocial interactions. Latino groups, and particularly Puerto Ricans, are an understudied population in the United States in terms of the prevalence of discrimination and its relevance to health. Participants in our study were 45‐ to 75‐year‐old (N = 1122) Puerto Ricans. The measures were perceived discrimination, depressive symptomatology (CES‐D), perceived stress (PSS), self‐rated health, medical conditions, blood pressure, smoking and drinking behaviours, demographics. Our findings show that 36.9 per cent of participants had at some time experienced discrimination, with men, those with more years of education, currently employed and with higher incomes being more likely to report it. Experiences of discrimination were associated with increased levels of depressive symptoms and perceived stress. When controlling for covariates, perceived discrimination was predictive of the number of medical conditions, of ever having smoked and having been a drinker, and having higher values of diastolic pressure. Depressive symptoms are a mediator of the effect of perceived discrimination on medical conditions, confirmed by the Sobel test: z = 3.57, p < 0.001. Mediating roles of perceived stress, smoking and drinking behaviours were not confirmed. Increased depressive symptoms might be the main pathway through which perceived discrimination is associated with a greater number of medical diagnoses.