A randomized single-blind trial of whole versus split-dose polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy preparation regimens are often poorly tolerated because they require use of large-volume bowel preparation solution and diet restrictions for adequate cleansing. This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of a split-dose polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution plus bisacodyl and a regular diet. METHODS: A total of 187 patients (104 men, 83 women; age range 18-91 years) were randomly assigned to receive either 3 L of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution (n = 96; Group A) with a liquid diet on the day before colonoscopy, or 2 L of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution, one tablet of bisacodyl, and a minimally restricted diet on the day before colonoscopy, and then 1 L of the same solution on the day of colonoscopy (n = 91; Group B). Acceptability, adverse events, and willingness to retake the preparation were assessed by questionnaire. The quality of the preparation was graded by an endoscopist, blinded to the type of preparation, by using a previously described scale (excellent to poor). RESULTS: There were 96 patients in Group A and 91 in Group B. Colon cleansing was significantly better in Group B with regard to the overall quality of the preparation (p lt; 0.05). Compliance was significantly higher in Group B as evidenced by the lower number of patients who discontinued the preparation (4 vs. 15; p = 0.02) because of side effects such as nausea or vomiting. The degree of discomfort, adverse events, and willingness to retake the preparation were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Colonic preparation with split-dose polyethylene glycol-electrolyte provided better quality colon cleansing and higher compliance, with less dietary restrictions, than preparation with whole-dose polyethylene glycol-electrolyte.     

Addressing Emergency Department Issues Using Advanced Practice in Saudi Arabia

Emergency departments (EDs) struggle to manage safe, effective care in the face of increasing patient volume. The role of the nurse practitioner has been shown to improve key factors such as waiting times and the patients’ experience in the ED. This quality improvement project evaluates the effectiveness of a nurse practitioner based in the ED. One nurse practitioner managed patients presenting with minor trauma over 3 months. A pre-post intervention approach was implemented and evaluated. Over 3 months, waiting times and the number of patients who left without being seen were reduced.     

Primary dural lymphoma: A novel concept of heterogeneous disease

Spinal primary dural lymphoma (PDL) is uncommon with a total of 37 previous well‐documented cases reported, including one diagnosed in the authors' institution. More recently we encountered an additional case of spinal PDL that, similarly to our previous case, was grade 1–2 follicular B‐cell PDL. Our two cases were diagnosed over a 3‐year interval in a 72‐year‐old female and a 74‐year‐old male, respectively. An exhaustive literature review on PDL was performed consequently to reveal that: (i) spinal and cerebral sites of involvement by PDL are constantly mutually exclusive; and (ii) unlike cerebral PDL, which is usually of marginal zone B‐cell type, only two of the 38 cases of spinal PDL were diagnosed as such, diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma being the most commonly encountered type in the spine. This divergence infers that, in contrast to the prevailing concept that PDL is a unique disease group, PDL appears to be rather heterogeneous with a difference in predilection of lymphoma type for the anatomical site of dural involvement. Such a site‐specific lymphoma‐type predilection phenomenon, well‐recognized in other organ systems, has not been acknowledged in PDL. This report brings new insights into PDL, and may contribute to a better understanding of nervous system pathophysiology and lymphoma classification.     

Coronary artery disease among asymptomatic diabetic and nondiabetic patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) and the plaque composition in asymptomatic diabetic and nondiabetic patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). BACKGROUND: CAD is the major cause of death among patients with diabetes. The true prevalence of CAD in asymptomatic diabetic patients, however, remains unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 328 consecutive patients (each with at least one risk factor or abnormal stress-test results) were referred for cardiac evaluation, 42 with diabetes and 286 without diabetes, all asymptomatic for cardiac-related symptoms. Groups were matched for age, sex, and CAD risk factors. CAD was defined as coronary atherosclerosis, with obstructive or nonobstructive lesions. CCTA was performed and findings compared between patients with diabetes and those without. RESULTS: CAD was present in 39 (93%) diabetic patients and in 211 (73%) nondiabetic patients (P=0.006). Obstructive CAD was more common in diabetic patients than in nondiabetic patients (29 vs. 6.6%, respectively; P<0.0001). In diabetic patients, more coronary segments with atherosclerosis per patient were detected (5.5 segments/patient vs. 2.8 segments/patient in nondiabetics; P<0.0001). The total Agatston score was significantly higher in diabetic patients vs. nondiabetic patients (370+/-96 and 79.9+/-16, respectively; P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate a high prevalence (93%) of CAD in asymptomatic diabetic patients with either nonobstructive or obstructive lesions. CCTA may be a useful imaging modality for selecting patients at high risk who would benefit most from further evaluation for subclinical ischemia.     

Incidental colorectal computed tomography abnormalities: would you send every patient for a colonoscopy?

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of colorectal wall thickening (CRWT) in patients undergoing abdominal computed tomography (CT) has not yet been definitively established. OBJECTIVES: To compare alleged findings on abdominal CT with those of a follow-up colonoscopy. METHODS: Ninety-four consecutive patients found to have large-bowel abnormalities on abdominal CT were referred for colonoscopy. Of these patients, 48 were referred for a suspected colorectal tumour and 46 for CRWT. Colonoscopy was performed and findings were compared. RESULTS: Of the 48 suspected colorectal tumours, 34 were determined to be neoplastic lesions on colonoscopy. Of these, 26 were malignant and eight were benign. Colonoscopy revealed no abnormality in 30 of 46 patients with CRWT as a solitary finding, and revealed some abnormality in 16 patients (12 had diverticular disease, four had benign neoplastic lesions). CONCLUSIONS: CRWT as an incidental and solitary finding on CT should not be regarded as a pathology prompting a colonoscopy. Approximately two-thirds of the patients had a normal colonoscopy and the remaining patients had benign lesions (12 had diverticular disease and four had benign neoplastic lesions). However, many of these patients seem to warrant colonoscopy regardless of CT findings, particularly patients who have a family history of colorectal cancer, have positive fecal occult blood test results or who are older than 50 years of age.