Effects of selective LDL apheresis on plasma concentrations of ICAM-1, VCAM-1 and P-selectin in diabetic patients with arteriosclerosis obliterans and receiving maintenance hemodialysis

BACKGROUND: Arteriosclerosis obliterans (ASO) is a serious complication in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) caused by diabetic nephropathy. Adsorption of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) has been performed to treat ASO. While efficacy of this treatment has been reported in limb ischemia, the mechanism underlying the benefit remains unclear. We investigated how LDL adsorption affected soluble adhesion molecules; P-selectin, an endothelial and platelet activation marker; inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-6 and tissue necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha; and lipids in serum. METHODS: Selective LDL adsorption by dextran sulfate columns (LDL apheresis) was performed weekly for 10 weeks to treat eight hemodialysis patients with ASO, ESRD, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Serum was sampled before and immediately after apheresis. RESULTS: LDL apheresis was performed safely. After LDL apheresis lipid concentrations were significantly reduced and clinical findings, such as Fontaine's classification and ankle brachial pressure index values, were improved. Pretreatment concentrations of soluble intercellular and vascular cell adhesion molecules (sICAM-1 and sVCAM-1) and also P-selectin were higher in patients than healthy controls. After apheresis these decreased, especially P-selectin. IL-1beta, IL-6, and TNF-alpha concentrations before apheresis were similar to those in controls and were unaffected by treatment. CONCLUSION: Effectiveness of LDL apheresis against ASO may involve decreased endothelial cell and platelet activation.     

Input–output analysis on the economic impact of medical care in Japan

Objectives

Since the Cabinet’s decision concerning the Basic Policies 2005, the Japanese government has implemented specific measures to suppress increases in national medical care expenditure. However, we believe that the economic significance of medical care should be quantified in terms of its economic impact on national medical care expenditure. No one has examined the economic impact of all medical institutions in Japan using data from a statement of profits and losses. We used an input–output analysis to quantitatively estimate economic impact of medical care and examined its estimation range with a probabilistic sensitivity analysis.

Methods

To estimate the economic impact and economic impact multipliers of all medical institutions in Japan, an input–output analysis model was developed using an input–output table, statement of profits and losses, margin rates, employee income rates, consumption propensity and an equilibrium output model. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted using a Monte Carlo simulation.

Results

Economic impact of medical care in all medical institutions was ¥72,107.4 billion ($661.5 billion). This impact yielded a 2.78-fold return of medical care expenditure with a 95 % confidence interval ranging from 2.74 to 2.90.

Conclusion

Economic impact of medical care in Japan was two to three times the medical care expenditure (per unit). Production inducement of medical care is comparable to other industrial sectors that are highly influential toward the economy. The contribution to medical care should be evaluated more explicitly in national medical care expenditure policies.