The risk of alloimmunization to c (Rh4) in R1R1 patients who present with anti-E

BACKGROUND: Because the Rh antigens E (Rh3) and c (Rh4) are relatively immunogenic, it has been suggested that R1R1 (E-, c-) patients who present with anti-E alone receive prophylactic c- (Rh: -4) red cell transfusions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: To determine the utility of this approach, the transfusion records of 100 consecutive R1R1 patients with anti-E identified over a 6-year period were reviewed. RESULTS: Thirty-two (32%) had anti-c concurrent with anti-E. Twenty-seven of the 68 patients who presented with anti-E alone received random (i.e., not typed for c [Rh4]) red cell transfusions. Five (18.5%) of the 27 subsequently developed anti-c 13 to 193 days (mean, 50) after transfusion of 2 to 14 (mean, 8) red cell units. None of the five had clinical evidence of hemolysis that could be attributed to a delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction. Twenty-two (81.5%) of the 27 failed to develop anti-c even after transfusion of 1 to 41 (mean, 9; median, 7) red cell units. CONCLUSION: The overall rate of immunization to c (Rh4) antigen in R1R1 patients with anti-E was 37 percent. Production of anti- c following transfusion to R1R1 patients with anti-E occurred in 18.5 percent of the cases in this series, which could have been avoided by the prophylactic use of R1R1 (E-, c-) blood for transfusion. The prophylactic use of c- (Rh: -4) blood in this patient population may be justified by the high immunization rate and the potential risk of delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction.     

Low risk of viral infection after administration of vapor-heated factor VIII concentrate. International Investigator Group

A multicenter prospective study was carried out to evaluate whether a vapor-heated factor VIII concentrate transmitted blood-borne viral infections over a surveillance period of 15 months. Thirty-five patients with hemophilia and von Willebrand disease who had never received any blood components were treated. Twenty-eight were analyzed and found not to have non-A, non-B hepatitis. Sera from 20 of these 28 patients were also tested for the antibody to the hepatitis C virus. None had sero-converted during the follow-up period. None of the patients analyzed developed markers of the hepatitis B virus (n = 17) or the human immunodeficiency virus (n = 31). This vapor-heated factor VIII concentrate carries a low risk of transmitting hepatitis and human immunodeficiency virus infection.     

Trends and cyclic variation in the incidence of childhood type 1 diabetes in two Italian regions over 33 years and during the COVID-19 pandemic

Aim

There is conflicting evidence about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence of type 1 diabetes. Here, we analysed long-term trends in the incidence of type 1 diabetes in Italian children and adolescents from 1989 to 2019 and compared the incidence observed during the COVID-19 pandemic with that estimated from long-term data.

Materials and Methods

This was a population-based incidence study using longitudinal data from two diabetes registries in mainland Italy. Trends in the incidence of type 1 diabetes from 1 January 1989 to 31 December 2019 were estimated using Poisson and segmented regression models.

Results

There was a significant increasing trend in the incidence of type 1 diabetes of 3.6% per year [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.4-4.8] between 1989 and 2003, a breakpoint in 2003, and then a constant incidence until 2019 (0.5%, 95% CI: -1.3 to 2.4). There was a significant 4-year cycle in incidence over the entire study period. The rate observed in 2021 (26.7, 95% CI: 23.0-30.9) was significantly higher than expected (19.5, 95% CI: 17.6-21.4; p = .010).

Conclusion

Long-term incidence analysis showed an unexpected increase in new cases of type 1 diabetes in 2021. The incidence of type 1 diabetes now needs continuous monitoring using population registries to understand better the impact of COVID-19 on new-onset type 1 diabetes in children.