Análisis coste-efectividad de samario-153 (Quadramet®) en el tratamiento del dolor en pacientes con cáncer de próstata y metástasis óseas

Objective. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of samarium [¹⁵³Sm-EDTMP] (Quadramet®) compared to conventional therapy in the treatment of pain in patients with prostate cancer and bone metastases. Method. A decision tree model for the treatment of bone pain due to metastases was adapted to the Spanish context. The model represents the standard treatment patterns in Spain for the study population. The time-course of the model is 4 months and it computes an estimate for the cost of pain control per patient. The effectiveness data for the model derive from a randomised trial. The current treatment patterns have been established according to the consensus opinions of a group of medical experts. Results. The cost of pain control per patient is ? 12,515.39 for conventional therapy and ? 5,595.52 for samarium-153 (Quadramet®) therapy. The incremental cost-effectiveness analysis shows that samarium-153 (Quadramet®) is a dominant therapy. It presents lower costs and higher efficacy than the conventional strategy. The sensitivity analyses showed these results to be robust. Conclusion. Samarium-153 (Quadramet®) is costeffective in treating pain in patients with prostate cancer and bone metastases.     

Tell Me Your Life: Including Life Stories in an Adult Development and Aging Course

The goals of this study were to determine the learning impact of an assignment that consisted of interviewing and analyzing older people’s life stories, and to explore how the assignment was evaluated by students. Participants in the study were 122 first-year social education students enrolled in an adult development and aging course. They evaluated the assignment using an eight-adjective questionnaire and were asked about the benefits of the task. Their answers to the questionnaire were then reviewed using content analysis. The results indicated that marks on the life story assignment predicted marks on an exam about basic course concepts. Students considered that the assignment was interesting, useful, and integrated into the course, although most of them also thought that it was very time-consuming. They identified benefits related to the explicit goals of the course (improvement in the learning of developmental concepts, the acquisition of research-related skills, and the deactivation of aging stereotypes) and personal, growth-related benefits. The authors discuss the difficulties posed by the assignment and its usefulness as a complement to more traditional, lecture-based teaching methods in adult development and aging courses.