Clinicopathological profile of orbital exenteration: 14 years of experience from a tertiary eye care center in South India

This study aims to describe the clinicopathological features and outcomes of patients who underwent orbital exenteration at a tertiary eye care center in south India. Retrospective chart reviews were performed on all patients undergoing orbital exenteration from January 1999 to December 2012. Parameters recorded include demographic data, clinical presentations, past medical or surgical interventions, exenteration notes, histopathological diagnosis, adjunctive treatment, follow-up examination findings, recurrences, complications, and their management. Orbital exenteration was performed on 119 orbits of 119 patients over a 14-year period. The mean age was 48.9 years (range 1–82 years). The indications were malignancies in 90.7 % (108/119), while 9.3 % (11/119) of cases were exenterated for non-malignant indications. Among the malignancies, the commonest tissue of origin was conjunctiva, noted in 45.4 % (49/108), followed by eyelids (25.9 %, 28/108), orbit (19.4 %, 21/108), and intraocular tissues (9.3 %, 10/108). The commonest malignancies noted in this series were an extensive ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) (44.4 %, 48/108) and sebaceous gland carcinoma of eyelids with an orbital involvement (18.5 %, 20/108). Extensive fungal granuloma (mucormycosis-4, aspergillosis-4) was the commonest (81.8 %, 9/11) indication among the non-malignant group. All complications were wound related, and none had a recurrence at a mean follow-up of 12.8 months. Extensive orbital involvement with OSSN and SGC were the commonest indications for exenteration. There is a need of creating awareness among general ophthalmologists in specific geographical regions regarding early diagnosis, standardized protocols of management, and appropriate referral.     

Sonographic features of umbilical catheter-related complications

Pediatric Radiology - Umbilical catheters are commonly used in the neonatal period for blood sampling or for administering medication or parenteral nutrition. The position of the catheter is...     

High Rates of Diabetes Mellitus,Pre-diabetes and Obesity Among Somali Immigrants and Refugees in Minnesota: A Retrospective Chart Review

We examined the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors among Somali refugees at a midwestern hospital in the U.S. This was a retrospective cohort study of 1007 adult Somali patients and an age and frequency-matched cohort of non-Somali patients actively empanelled to a large, academic primary care practice network in the Midwest United States between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2012. Cardiovascular risk factors were obtained by chart review and compared between the two cohorts using a Chi squared test. Median age was 35 years (Q1, Q3; 27, 50). The prevalence of diabetes was significantly higher among Somali versus non-Somali patients (12.1 vs 5.3 %; p = 0.0001), as was prediabetes (21.3 vs 17.2 %; p < 0.02) and obesity (34.6 vs 32.1 %; p = 0.047). After adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, education and employment, among the Somali patients, the odds ratio (95 % confidence interval) for diabetes was 2.78 (1.76–4.40) and 1.57 (1.16–2.13) for pre-diabetes. There was a significantly higher prevalence of diabetes, pre-diabetes and obesity among Somali patients compared with non-Somali patients. Further research into the specific causes of these disparities and development of targeted effective and sustainable interventions to address them is needed.     

Can neuroimaging help aphasia researchers? Addressing generalizability,variability, and interpretability

Neuroimaging studies of individuals with brain damage seek to link brain structure and activity to cognitive impairments, spontaneous recovery, or treatment outcomes. To date, such studies have relied on the critical assumption that a given anatomical landmark corresponds to the same functional unit(s) across individuals. However, this assumption is fallacious even across neurologically healthy individuals. Here, we discuss the severe implications of this issue, and argue for an approach that circumvents it, whereby: (i) functional brain regions are defined separately for each subject using fMRI, allowing for inter-individual variability in their precise location; (ii) the response profile of these subject-specific regions are characterized using various other tasks; and (iii) the results are averaged across individuals, guaranteeing generalizabliity. This method harnesses the complementary strengths of single-case studies and group studies, and it eliminates the need for post hoc “reverse inference” from anatomical landmarks back to cognitive operations, thus improving data interpretability.