Innate immunity and systemic lupus erythematosus

Innate immunity is the first‐line host defence against pathogens and damaged host cells, and the major cellular components are phagocytes such as monocytes/macrophages, polymorphonuclear cells and dendritic cells. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the loss of tolerance to self‐antigens, the source of which has been suggested to be apoptotic cells. In this article, we will review studies on apoptosis in SLE and discuss the contribution of innate immunity abnormalities in the development of this condition.     

Predictors of poor outcome in children with steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome

Background and objective

Nearly 50% of the children with steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) have a frequently relapsing (FR) or steroid dependent (SD) course, experiencing steroid toxicities and complications of immunosuppression. The study aimed to compare parameters between children with infrequent relapsing (IFR) and FR/SD nephrotic syndrome and to identify the factors associated with a FR/SD course.

Plasma elimination of cholyl‐lysyl‐fluorescein (CLF): a pilot study in patients with liver cirrhosis

Abstract: Background: Cholyl‐lysyl‐fluorescein (CLF) is a fluorescein‐labelled bile acid whose biological behaviour closely resembles that of naturally occurring cholyl glycine. Aim: The aim of this study was to analyze the CLF plasma elimination in patients with liver cirrhosis. Methods: A dose of CLF at 0.02 mg/kg b.w. was administered i.v. in 26 patients with liver cirrhosis and 9 healthy volunteers. Blood samples were collected before injection and then at 10 min intervals over 60 min. Plasma fluorescence was measured by a luminescence spectrometer and residual fluorescence over the time of the study was compared in each group. Routine liver function tests (rLFTs) were performed before each injection. Results: Plasma elimination of CLF was significantly impaired in patients with cirrhosis compared to healthy subjects with p values <0.0001 at each analyzed time point. CLF test showed 100% sensitivity for liver cirrhosis when residual fluorescence was measured 30, 40, 50 and 60 min after injection. Routine LFTs showed 85% sensitivity for bilirubin, 84% for total bile acids, 69% for aspartate aminotransferase 62% for albumin and 50% for alkaline phosphatase. CLF elimination measured 60 min after injection correlated with Child‐Pugh score (r=0.3945; p<0.05) and albumin (r_s=0.6451; p<0.001). No adverse reaction or side effects of CLF were observed. Conclusions: CLF test clearly distinguished between the two analyzed groups and was more sensitive than routine liver function tests. The test appears safe, simple to perform and analyze and after validation in larger cohorts of patients may have the potential to become a useful dynamic test of liver function.     

Short‐term adverse effects of early subclinical allograft inflammation in kidney transplant recipients with a rapid steroid withdrawal protocol

The impact of subclinical inflammation (SCI) noted on early kidney allograft biopsies remains unclear. This study evaluated the outcome of SCI noted on 3‐month biopsy. A total of 273/363 (75%) kidney transplant recipients with a functioning kidney underwent allograft biopsies 3‐months posttransplant. Among those with stable allograft function at 3 months, 200 biopsies that did not meet the Banff criteria for acute rejection were identified. These were Group I: No Inflammation (NI, n = 71) and Group II: Subclinical Inflammation (SCI, n = 129). We evaluated differences in kidney function at 24‐months and allograft histology score at 12‐month biopsy. SCI patients had a higher serum creatinine (1.6 ± 0.7 vs 1.38 ± 0.45; P = .02) at 24‐months posttransplant, and at last follow‐up at a mean of 42.5 months (1.69 ± 0.9 vs 1.46 ± 0.5 mg/dL; P = .027). The allograft chronicity score (ci + ct + cg + cv) at 12‐months posttransplant was higher in the SCI group (2.4 ± 1.35 vs 1.9 ± 1.2; P = .02). The incidence of subsequent rejections within the first year in SCI and NI groups was 24% vs 10%, respectively (P = .015). De novo donor‐specific antibody within 12 months was more prevalent in the SCI group (12/129 vs 1/71, P = .03). SCI is likely not a benign finding and may have long‐term implications for kidney allograft function.     

Intravenous morphine can avoid distressing constipation associated with oral morphine: a retrospective analysis of our experience in 11 patients in the palliative care in-patient unit

Morphine is the preferred strong opioid analgesic. Most of the adverse effects, such as daytime drowsiness, dizziness, mental clouding, and effects on cognitive and psychomotor function or nausea and vomiting, usually resolve with time. The main continuing adverse effect of morphine is constipation, and prophylactic use of laxative is almost always required. We are presenting retrospective data of 11 patients admitted in our palliative care unit over the past 5 months for new (not yet received any opioid analgesic in any form) and severe cancer pain management. It was found that none of the patients was having constipation with intravenous morphine. This finding can be explained on the basis of differences in pharmacologic profiles, in affinity to opioid receptor, and a higher exposure of opioid-binding receptor in the GI tract after oral administration of morphine compared with intravenous morphine. This explanation was further affirmed as constipation and need for laxative was reported by 7 of the 11 patients when they were given the equi-analgesic oral doses of morphine. Thus, the route of administration seems to be responsible for the above finding; hence, further evaluation with prospective observation and data collection is being planned to look for external validity in a larger population catered by our palliative care unit.