Risk indicators for the presence and extent of root caries among caries-active adults enrolled in the Xylitol for Adult Caries Trial (X-ACT)

Objective

This paper uses baseline data from a randomized clinical trial to evaluate cross-sectional indicators of root caries in caries-active adults.

Materials and methods

Adults (21–80?years) having at least 12 erupted teeth and between one and ten caries lesions were enrolled. Participants (n?=?437) received caries exams by trained, calibrated examiners and responded to baseline demographic and medical–dental questionnaires. We examined associations between baseline characteristics and (1) the presence of any root caries using Mantel–Haenszel hypothesis tests and odds ratio (OR) estimators and (2) the number of root surfaces with caries among study participants with exposed root surfaces (n?=?349) using Mantel–Haenszel mean score tests and Mann–Whitney estimators.

Results/conclusions

Adjusting for study site and age, male gender [OR, 1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08, 2.78], white race (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.43, 3.98), recent dental visit (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.07, 3.66), poor self-described oral health (OR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.10, 6.39), and recent professional fluoride treatment (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.06, 3.25) were significantly associated with increased odds to have any root caries, and study participants with exposed root surfaces characterized by male gender [Mann–Whitney probability estimate (MW)?=?0.57; 95% CI, 0.51, 0.63), white race (MW, 0.61; 0.55, 0.68), recent dental visit (MW, 0.58; 0.50, 0.67), poor self-described oral health (MW, 0.61; 0.53, 0.69), and flossing at least once per day (MW, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.51, 0.62) were significantly more likely to have a greater number of root surfaces with caries than a randomly selected study participant from their respective complementary subgroups (female gender, non-white, etc.).

Clinical relevance

Our findings may help identify individuals at higher root caries risk.     

High frequency of osteoporosis and fractures in women with dermatomyositis/polymyositis

Bone mass was only previously studied in juvenile dermatomyositis/polymyositis (DM/PM) patients. Therefore, the objective this study was to evaluate the prevalence of osteoporosis and fractures in adult DM/PM. Forty female DM/PM and 78 age-, gender-, and BMI-matched healthy controls were studied. Medical charts and clinical interviews of all patients were evaluated for demographic and clinical data, including disease activity, cumulative doses of glucocorticoid, menarche and menopause age, and fractures. Bone mineral density (BMD) using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were measured at lumbar spine (L1–L4) and hip. A decreased BMD in lumbar spine [0.902 (0.136) vs. 0.965 (0.141) g/cm², P?=?0.022] and femoral neck [0.729 (0.12) vs. 0.784 (0.127) g/cm², P?=?0.027] was observed in patients compared to controls. In addition, osteoporosis was more frequent in patients than in controls in both lumbar spine (20 vs. 3.8%, P?=?0.007) and the femoral neck (27.5 vs. 10.3%, P?=?0.016). Moreover, a high prevalence of fractures was found in patients in comparison to healthy subjects (17.9 vs. 5.1%, P?=?0.040; OR?=?3.92; CI 95%:1.07–14.33). Comparing DM/PM patients with (n?=?17) and without (n?=?23) osteoporosis/fractures, significant differences were observed regarding age [56.8 (11.9) vs. 48.3 (13.2) years, P?=?0.042], weight [62.05 (13.56) vs. 71.51 (11.46) kg, P?=?0.022] and frequency of post menopausal women (94.1 vs. 65.2%, P?=?0.0002). No differences were observed concerning height, lean mass, total fat mass, disease activity, mean value of creatine kinase, cumulative glucocorticoid dose, or bisphosphonate use. Logistic regression analysis revealed a negative association between the presence of osteoporosis/fractures and weight (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85–0.98; P?=?0.016). This is the first study that analyzed bone mass in adult DM/PM patients and it demonstrated that about one quarter of these patients have osteoporosis/fracture.