Appropriateness,diagnostic value,and outcomes of repeat testing following index echocardiography

Aims

Emergency admission to hospital is associated with an economic burden and mortality. Echocardiography is often the first‐line cardiovascular imaging investigation. Repeat testing is common; however, there are sparse data on the prevalence, appropriateness, or outcome of repeat testing.

Methods

We performed an electronic database search for patients with emergency admissions to our institution in February 2015. An electronic patient record review of inpatient echocardiograms was undertaken. Indications for echocardiography were classified as appropriate, may be appropriate, or rarely appropriate. One‐year follow‐up for repeat testing and mortality was investigated.

Results

A total of 409 of 2306 (17.7%) unplanned/emergency admissions underwent inpatient echocardiography. Abnormalities were identified in 165/409 (40.3%) of these patients; 154 of 409 (37.7%) had a repeat echocardiogram within the next year. Rarely appropriate indications for echocardiography occurred in 51 (33%) of repeat vs 53 (16%) of index echocardiograms, P < .0001. Repeat testing was associated with a change in findings in 17/154 (11%) patients overall. All of whom had an abnormal index echocardiogram and had an appropriate indication. There was no difference in mean survival time between patients who underwent repeat and those who only underwent a single index echocardiogram (310 days vs 327 days), P = .34.

Conclusion

Inpatient echocardiography in emergency hospital admissions identifies clinically important pathology. Repeated testing is common within 1 year of hospital admission. New diagnostic findings occurred in 11% of patients and only in patients with appropriate studies and an abnormal index echocardiogram. Identification of methods to reduce repeat testing and implement appropriateness criteria is warranted.     

Cutaneous venous malformations presenting in an adolescent boy: Cerebral cavernous malformation syndrome

Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCM) are collections of enlarged capillaries with irregular structure, located in the brain or spinal cord, that can be life-threatening. We describe a neurologically asymptomatic 15-year-old boy who presented with cutaneous venous malformations (CVM) that developed in adolescence. Owing to his family history of CCM, genetic testing was obtained and confirmed a new mutation in the CCM3 (PDCD10) gene. Brain imaging showed multiple CCM. Although currently asymptomatic, he will continue to be monitored annually by neurology to assess for symptoms of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) that would warrant investigation with MRI.     

Assessing quality of a worksite health promotion programme from participants’ views: findings from a qualitative study in Malaysia

Background An assessment of the process and outcomes of a health promotion programme is necessary for the continuous improvement of a programme. Objective To explore the participants’ perceptions of the quality and effectiveness of the ‘Love Your Heart Programme’. Design A qualitative study using semi‐structured interviews with a purposive sample of participants of the ‘Love Your Heart’ programme. Interviews were based on an interview guide that grouped questions into four main subgroups: structure, process, immediate outcomes and impact. The interviews were audio‐recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the principles of grounded theory. Results A total of 17 interviews were conducted. The participants were satisfied with the structural aspects of the programme. Different opinions arose regarding the ideal frequency and duration of the programme. The content of the seminars was thought to be too general. There was also a lack of interest in the ‘Road to a Healthy Heart’ booklet. All of the respondents had positive opinions about the communication skills and attitude of the health educator. The potential advantages and disadvantages of participating in the programme were discussed. Finally, the respondents expressed their satisfaction with the programme and the impact it had on them. Discussion and conclusions In general, the participants who were interviewed held the programme, and the health educator conducted the programme in high regard. The suggestions that were received can be used to further improve the acceptability and feasibility of the programme.