Impaired anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody response in non-severe COVID-19 patients with diabetes mellitus: A preliminary report

Background and aimsPatients with diabetes mellitus (DM) often demonstrate impaired antibody response to influenza/hepatitis B vaccines. Hence, we compared anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody response in non-severe COVID-19 patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).MethodsRecords of non-severe COVID-19 patients admitted at our institution between April 10, 2020 and May 20, 2020 were retrieved. Qualitative detection of total (IgG + IgM) anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody was performed using electrochemiluminescence immunoassay in plasma samples collected at least 14 days post-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) confirmation of diagnosis.ResultsThirty-one non-severe COVID-19 patients were included. Nine patients (29%) had T2DM with mean HbA_1c at admission of 8.3 ± 1.0%. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody was estimated at a median of 16 (14–17) days post-PCR confirmation of COVID-19 diagnosis. Only three patients (10%) were seronegative, and all had T2DM. Patients with T2DM were more likely to have non-detectable anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies than those without DM (p = 0.019).ConclusionsCOVID-19 patients with T2DM may not undergo seroconversion even after two weeks of diagnosis. Impaired seroconversion could theoretically increase the risk of reinfections in patients with DM. However, the finding requires validation in large-scale studies involving serial estimations of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in patients with and without DM.     

Cannabis/Cannabinoids for Treating COVID-19 Associated Neuropsychiatric Complications

COVID-19 epidemic has resulted in devastating mortality and morbidity consisting of socioeconomic and health effects that have included respiratory/pulmonary, cardiovascular, mental health and neurological consequences such as anxiety, depression, and substance use. Several effective vaccines have been developed and extensive efforts are underway to develop therapeutics to treat COVID-19. Cannabis and/or its product-cannabidiol (CBD) are being advertised for the treatment of COVID-19 associated mental/neurological complications and substance use disorders. However, research reviewed shows that there is insufficient data from clinical studies to support the use of cannabis or CBD for the treatment of COVID-19 associated mental health and neurological complications. Additional basic and clinical research is suggested to develop cannabis or cannabidiol for the treatment of mental health problems associated with coronavirus infection and or substance use disorders. In the meantime, it is important that the addiction physician/psychiatrist must caution while prescribing or recommending cannabis or CBD for treating such clinical indications.

Graphical abstract

Research shows that currently there is no clinical evidence to support the use of cannabis or any of its compounds including CBD for treating any of the neuropsychiatric complications of COVID-19. Thus, it is important that the addiction physicians/psychiatrists caution their patients from using cannabis or cannabis products for treating any such complications.

     

The timing of drain removal—empiricism or science?

Surgical drains are commonly used in plastic surgery. Drains are subsequently removed at arbitrary volumes depending on local protocols. The rational for when to remove a drain has not been scientifically determined. We compared removal of drains at ≤30?ml/24?h vs. ≤50?ml/24?h for 158 wounds, in 90 patients. Postoperative complications, length of hospital stay and resulting cost–benefit were considered. Prospective data were collected for two consecutive similar cohorts of patients undergoing abdominoplasty, bilateral breast reduction and breast augmentation. In the first cohort, drains were removed when drainage was ≤30?ml/24?h and the second cohort when ≤50?ml/24?h. Demographics, days of drainage, surgeon grade and duration of postoperative hospital stay were recorded. Patient records were then analysed and complications recorded, including haematoma, infection, seroma, wound breakdown and fat necrosis. The median postoperative stay for all three operations for both drainage cohorts was similar with no statistically significant difference; however, the drainage time in breast augmentation was significantly less in the <50?ml/24?h group. There were no significant differences in outcome measures between the patients undergoing abdominoplasty, breast reduction or breast augmentation. Drain removal at ≤50 vs. ≤30?ml/24?h did not result in an increase in postoperative morbidity or adverse outcome in any of the three different operation types.     

Stratification of the aggressiveness of prostate cancer using pre‐biopsy multiparametric MRI (mpMRI)

Risk stratification, based on the Gleason score (GS) of a prostate biopsy, is an important decision‐making tool in prostate cancer management. As low‐grade disease may not need active intervention, the ability to identify aggressive cancers on imaging could limit the need for prostate biopsies. We assessed the ability of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in pre‐biopsy risk stratification of men with prostate cancer. One hundred and twenty men suspected to have prostate cancer underwent mpMRI (diffusion MRI and MR spectroscopic imaging) prior to biopsy. Twenty‐six had cancer and were stratified into three groups based on GS: low grade (GS ≤ 6), intermediate grade (GS = 7) and high grade (GS ≥ 8). A total of 910 regions of interest (ROIs) from the peripheral zone (PZ, range 25–45) were analyzed from these 26 patients. The metabolite ratio [citrate/(choline + creatine)] and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of voxels were calculated for the PZ regions corresponding to the biopsy cores and compared with histology. The median metabolite ratios for low‐grade, intermediate‐grade and high‐grade cancer were 0.29 (range: 0.16, 0.61), 0.17 (range: 0.13, 0.32) and 0.13 (range: 0.05, 0.23), respectively (p = 0.004). The corresponding mean ADCs (×10^–3 mm²/s) for low‐grade, intermediate‐grade and high‐grade cancer were 0.99 ± 0.08, 0.86 ± 0.11 and 0.69 ± 0.12, respectively (p < 0.0001). The combined ADC and metabolite ratio model showed strong discriminatory ability to differentiate subjects with GS ≤ 6 from subjects with GS ≥ 7 with an area under the curve of 94%. These data indicate that pre‐biopsy mpMRI may stratify PCa aggressiveness noninvasively. As the recent literature data suggest that men with GS ≤ 6 cancer may not need radical therapy, our data may help limit the need for biopsy and allow informed decision making for clinical intervention. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.