TRANSURETHRAL PROSTATIC RESECTION OR LASER THERAPY FOR MEN WITH ACUTE URINARY RETENTION: THE CLASP RANDOMIZED TRIAL

PURPOSE: Transurethral resection of the prostate is the standard operation for acute urinary retention, although laser prostatectomy is reportedly effective and safe. The ClasP (conservative management, laser, transurethral resection of the prostate) study compared transurethral prostatic resection and noncontact neodymium (Nd):YAG visual laser assisted prostatectomy for treatment of acute urinary retention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a multicenter randomized controlled trial, analyses were by intention to treat and followup was at 7.5 months after randomization. Primary outcomes were treatment failure, and included International Prostate Symptom Score, International Prostate Symptom Score quality of life score, residual urine and flow rate. Secondary outcomes included complications, and duration of catheterization and hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 148 men were randomized to transurethral prostatic resection (74) and laser (74). There were fewer treatment failures after prostatic resection (p = 0.008) and fewer men after resection required secondary surgery for poor results (1 versus 7, p = 0.029). Maximum flow rates after transurethral prostatic resection were better than after laser (mean difference 4.4 ml. per second). Comparison of symptom and quality of life scores demonstrated that any clinically significant advantage for laser could be ruled out. Patients stayed a mean of 2 extra days in the hospital after resection. The duration of catheterization was greater after laser but significantly fewer major treatment complications were found with laser therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Transurethral prostatic resection was more effective, resulted in fewer failures than laser treatment and remains the procedure of choice for men with acute urinary retention.     

Linear Nodular Collagenoma—Successful Treatment with Intralesional Triamcinolone acetonide

Abstract:   A 17-year-old boy presented with papules and nodules arranged linearly on the neck and on the forehead. A diagnosis of collagenoma was made. Intralesional injection of triamcinolone acetonide resulted in marked effacement of the lesions.     

Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of Combining “Paclitaxel” Eluting Balloon and “Limus” Eluting Stent in the Same Lesion

Objectives

To assess the safety and efficacy of combining drug‐eluting balloon (DEB) and drug‐eluting stents (DES) in the same coronary lesion.

Background

Use of DEB may not always produce optimal results or even result in dissection, compelling the operators to consider bailout stenting with bare metal stents (BMS). However, BMS may not be ideal in patients who have significant risk‐profile for restenosis. We have opted for DES over BMS in such situations and present our follow‐up data.

Methods

Between 2009 and 2011, 46 patients (57 lesions) requiring bailout stenting following DEB use were treated with second‐generation DES. All patients had at‐least one or more risk‐factors that made them vulnerable for restenosis (diabetes, chronic kidney disease, previous in‐stent restenosis [ISR], and/or long diffuse lesions ≥30 mm).

Results

Of the 57 lesions, 34 (60%) were previous ISR. The mean length of the DEB was: 36.2 ± 5.6 mm. All patients had TIMI‐3 flow post PCI with no in‐lab complications. At median follow‐up of 12.3 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 7.5–18.1), the rates target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) were 3 (5.3%) and 4 (7%), respectively. One patient had died 3 months following treatment. There were no episodes of myocardial infarction, definite or probable stent thrombosis. The major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) rate defined as cardiac‐death, MI, and TVR occurred in 11% of patients.

Conclusion

The results from this novel strategy of combining “Paclitaxel” eluting balloon and “Limus” eluting stent in a same lesion are encouraging. Dual drug‐elution acting on two different pathways may provide potential synergy that may explain the favorable outcome. (J Interven Cardiol 2013;26:259–263)

     

A novel ARX phenotype: rapid neurodegeneration with Ohtahara syndrome and a dyskinetic movement disorder

ARX mutations are associated with variable clinical phenotypes. We report a new neurodegenerative phenotype associated with a known ARX mutation and causing early abnormal neurodevelopment, a complex movement disorder, and early infantile epileptic encephalopathy with a suppression‐burst pattern (Ohtahara syndrome). A male infant presented at age 5 months with a dyskinetic movement disorder, which was initially diagnosed as infantile spasms. Clinical deterioration was accompanied by progressive cortical atrophy with a reduction in white matter volume and resulting in death in the first year of life; such a rapidly progressive and severe phenotype has not previously been described. ARX mutation testing should be undertaken in children aged less than 1 year with Ohtahara syndrome and a movement disorder, and in infants with unexplained neurodegeneration, progressive white matter loss, and cortical atrophy.