Aminoglycoside-associated hypomagnesaemia in children with cystic fibrosis

Hypomagnesaemia in children with cystic fibrosis (CF) is under-recognized. We report a child with CF who developed significant hypomagnesaemia following intravenous (i.v.) treatment with aminoglycosides for exacerbations of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Three additional cases have also been observed. Investigations in two patients have revealed excessive renal loss of magnesium. It is postulated that renal tubular damage secondary to the cumulative effects of repeated courses of aminoglycosides resulted in hypomagnesaemia, and we suggest screening for this problem by monitoring serum magnesium regularly in all patients with CF receiving multiple courses of aminoglycosides.     

Liver transplant recipients: portable duplex US with correlative angiography

Twenty patients, aged 4 months to 58 years, were evaluated for liver transplantation by duplex sonography, and 15 transplantations were completed; 42 postoperative examinations were performed. Sonographic findings were correlated with seven preoperative and five postoperative angiographic evaluations. Preoperative duplex US findings included tumors, portal vein occlusion, varices, biliary obstruction, and variant vascular anatomy. Postoperative findings included hepatic artery occlusion, portal vein occlusions (one with cavernous transformation), portal vein stenosis, biliary obstruction, intrahepatic and extrahepatic fluid collections, and air in the portal vein due to ischemic bowel. Use of angiography allowed confirmation of the vascular abnormalities and demonstrated evidence of rejection in patients with normal Doppler waveforms. Duplex sonography is a valuable portable technique for evaluating these patients and can be used in triage of patients requiring angiography.     

Measuring the hospital experiences of junior doctors

The development of an appraisal questionnaire which measures junior doctors' opinions about their hospital experiences is described. The first section of the questionnaire consists of seven reliable subscales which measure opinions about teaching and learning, registrar teaching, consultant teaching, staff support, workload, administration and overall experiences during a period of attachment or term. The second part of the survey contains 11 reliable questions about the hours spent on service and education during the term. The responses to this measure of 257 randomly selected Australian junior doctors are described. The questionnaire may be used to contrast the experiences of junior doctors in different types of terms, different hospitals or varying levels of training. The data generated from the instrument can provide useful information about hospitals, such as the work practices of junior staff and the effectiveness of educational programs.     

Use of child development assessment in early childhood education: early childhood practitioner and student attitudes toward formal and informal testing

Twenty early childhood practitioners (ECPs) and final-year Bachelor of Early Childhood Studies students completed a questionnaire about their use (or planned use) of formal and informal child development assessment instruments, their choice of specific instruments, and factors influencing decisions to conduct child development assessments within their early childhood programmes. While most ECPs and all students indicated use (or planned use) of informal assessment, 70% of students and only 10% of ECPs indicated use of formal assessment. Whereas ECPs identified 'ease of use' as most important, 'accuracy of the instrument' was most important to students. In deciding to use any assessment, students ranked 'identifies children at risk' as most important, compared with ECPs who ranked 'provides a good picture of children's development' as most important. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for the early childhood field and for pre-service training in child development assessment.     

HIV/AIDS infection control enforcement: a comparison between Nigeria and the United States

We examined differences in approaches to HIV-related infection control practices in two university teaching hospitals in the United States and Nigeria. Health care workers (n = 202 in Nigeria and 186 in the USA) responded to a previously validated measure of infection control practices. There were significant differences in the estimated probability of treating a person with HIV disease (higher in USA), and a greater probability of peer ridicule as a way of enforcing group norms on infection control in Nigeria. Peer enforcement of norms was significantly lower in the USA. In both countries, more precautions would be taken if it was known that the patient was HIV infected. Infection control practices were more likely to be followed in the USA compared with Nigeria if they were praised for this activity, if appropriate facilities (sharps containers, gloves, etc.) were nearby, and if they felt that infection control procedures were effective. These data point to the importance of normative social pressures in Nigeria and of knowing the patient is HIV infected in the USA and feeling that infection control procedures are effective ways of avoiding occupational HIV infection. The role of normative pressures and assumptions about HIV infection status as well as cues and availability of facilities for infection control appear to differ between these health care workers in Nigeria and the USA.