Phrenic Nerve Injury After Catheter Ablation: Should We Worry About This Complication?

Introduction: Phrenic nerve injury (PNI) is a complication that can occur with catheter ablation.
Methods: Data from 17 patients with PNI following different catheter ablation techniques were reviewed. PNI was defined as decreased motility (transient) or paralysis (persistent) of the hemi-diaphragm on fluoroscopy or chest X-ray. Patient's recovery was monitored. Normalization of chest images and sniff test would be considered as complete clinical recovery.
Results: Out of the 17 PNI patients (16 right, 1 left), 13 (11 persistent, 2 transient) occurred after pulmonary veins isolation with or without superior vena cava ablation. Three patients had persistent PNI after sinus node modification and one other patient experienced PNI after epicardial ventricular tachycardia ablation. Ablation was performed with different energy source including radiofrequency  (n = 13)  , cryothermal  (n = 1)  , ultrasound  (n = 2)  and laser  (n = 1)  . Patient's symptoms varied broadly from asymptomatic to dyspnea, and even to respiratory insufficiency that required temporary mechanical ventilation support. Two patients with transient PNI resolved immediately after the procedure and the other 15 persistent PNI patients resolved within a mean time of  8.3 ± 6.6 months  .
Conclusions: PNI caused by catheter ablation appears to functionally recover over time regardless of the energy sources used for the procedure.     

Liver transplantation: Issues for the next 20 years

The growing numbers of potential transplant recipients on waiting lists is increasingly disproportionate to the supply of cadaveric donor organs. The hope for the next 20 years is that supply will satisfy demand. This requires both a reduction in indications for the procedure and an increase in the transplants performed. A multi-pronged approach is needed to increase cadaveric organ donation, generating enthusiasm for donation among both the general public and hospital staff. Accurate assessment of marginal grafts with stringent criteria known to predict graft function will diminish wastage of organs. Methods of rehabilitating marginal grafts during extracorporeal perfusion will increase organ availability. Supply of non-heart beating donors can be greatly expanded and protocols developed with ethical consent to optimize their initial function despite warm ischemia. Splitting livers that fulfill selection criteria, thus providing for two recipients, should be universally applied with acceptable incentives to those units who do not directly benefit. A proportion of recipients, though not those transplanted for autoimmune disease, will be spared the side-effects of immunosuppression thanks to immune tolerance. Protocols for close monitoring of those patients for rejection during treatment withdrawal must be carefully observed. In addition to gene therapy, it is highly likely that hepatocyte transplantation will replace orthotopic grafting in patients without cirrhosis, especially for inherited metabolic diseases. It is much more difficult to envisage that heterologous stem cell transplantation or xenotransplantation will have clinical impact in the next 20 years, although research in those areas has obvious long-term potential.