Cost of postoperative complications: How to avoid calculation errors

Postoperative complications(PC) are a basic health outcome, but no surgery service in the world records and/or audits the PC associated with all the surgical procedures it performs. Most studies that have assessed the cost of PC suffer from poor quality and a lack of transparency and consistency. The payment system in place often rewards the volume of services provided rather than the quality of patients' clinical outcomes. Without a thorough registration of PC, the economic costs involved cannot be determined. An accurate, reliable appraisal would help identify areas for investment in order to reduce the incidence of PC,improve surgical results, and bring down the economic costs. This article describes how to quantify and classify PC using the Clavien-Dindo classification and the comprehensive complication index, discusses the perspectives from which economic evaluations are performed and the minimum postoperative follow-up established, and makes various recommendations. The availability of accurate and impartially audited data on PC will help reduce their incidence and bring down costs. Patients, the health authorities, and society as a whole are sure to benefit.     

The Syrian refugees crisis brings challenges to the health authorities in Europe: hepatitis A virus is a case in point

European Journal of Epidemiology -     

Assessment of bleeding in chronic liver disease and coagulopathy using the IMPROVE bleeding criteria

Background: In this study, the authors utilized the IMPROVE (International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism) bleeding definition to explore the safety profile of pharmacologic venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and concurrent coagulopathy (INR ≥1.5).

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 193 adult patient admissions with a diagnosis of CLD and INR ≥1.5 not due to therapeutic anticoagulation. Patients were stratified based on their receipt of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis or not during hospitalization. The rates of overall bleeding, defined as the composite of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding; major bleeding; and clinically relevant non-major bleeding, within 14 days of admission were evaluated. Secondary endpoints included the rates of thrombosis and mortality.

Results: The composite of overall bleeding occurred in 17.6% of the admissions. More patients in the group not receiving pharmacological thromboprophylaxis had overall bleeding (18.5% vs 10%), major bleeding (13.3% vs 10%), and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (14.5% vs 5%), with overlapping 95% CI. When stratified per pharmacological thromboprophylaxis status, IMPROVE bleeding risk score (BRS)?≥?7 was associated with higher rates of overall bleeding, major bleeding, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding as compared to IMPROVE BRS <7, whether patients received or did not receive pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. The overall incidence of in-hospital mortality among our study population was 15.5%. Receiving pharmacological thromboprophylaxis was markedly associated with higher in-hospital mortality (OR?=?16.58, 95% CI?=?4.47–61.45).

Conclusion: This study shows that the IMPROVE BRS calculated on admission may serve as a guide for omission of thromboprophylaxis in advanced CLD.     

Classifications of acute pancreatitis: to Atlanta and beyond

Until Atlanta Classification (AC) made in 1992, there was not any classification of acute pancreatitis (AP). Last twenty years AC let us compare results and papers. But the increasing understanding of the pathophysiology of AP, improvements in diagnostic methods and the development of minimally invasive tools for radiological, endoscopic and surgical management of local complications, several authors have called for the AC to be reviewed. Last months, two new classifications of AP have been published. We made a historical review of AC, the two new classifications and a comparison between them.     

Is it safe to preserve the nipple areola complex during skin-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer?

Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with nipple areola complex (NAC) preservation appears to be oncologically safe, provided the tumor is not close to the nipple and a frozen section protocol for the retroareolar tissue is followed.