Reduced GABA/glutamate in the thalamus of individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis

Youth at clinical high risk (CHR) are a unique population enriched for precursors of major psychiatric disorders, especially schizophrenia (SCZ). Recent neuroimaging findings point to abnormalities in the thalamus of patients with SCZ, including chronic and early course patients, as well as in CHR individuals relative to healthy comparison groups, thus suggesting that thalamic dysfunctions are present even before illness onset. Furthermore, modeling data indicate that alteration between excitatory and inhibitory control, as reflected by alteration in GABAergic and glutamatergic balance (i.e., GABA/Glu), may underlie thalamic deficits linked to the risk and development of psychosis. There is, however, a lack of in vivo evidence of GABA/Glu thalamic abnormalities in the CHR state. Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) 7 Tesla (7 T) provides enhanced resolution to quantify GABA and Glu levels in the thalamus of CHR individuals. In this study, we performed 7 T MRSI in 15 CHR and 20 healthy control (HC) participants. We found that GABA/Glu was significantly reduced in the right medial anterior and right medial posterior thalamus of CHR relative to HC groups. The GABA/Glu reduction was negatively correlated with general symptoms in the right medial anterior thalamus, as well as with disorganization symptoms in the right medial posterior thalamus. Altogether, these findings indicate that GABA/Glu abnormalities are present in the thalamus before the onset of full-blown psychosis and are associated with symptom severity, thus providing putative molecular and neuronal targets for early interventions in youth at CHR.Subject terms: Predictive markers, Psychosis, Neuroscience, Risk factors     

Comparison of efficacy and safety of intralesional triamcinolone and combination of triamcinolone with 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars: Randomised control trial

The treatment of keloid and hypertrophic scar is challenging with no universally accepted mode for permanent ablation. Conventional therapies yield unpredictable results, significant complications and require elaborate hardware.

Second-degree Heart Block Caused by Itolizumab-induced Infusion Reaction in COVID-19

How to cite this article: Kumar A, Kumar N, Lenin D, Kumar A, Ahmad S. Second-degree Heart Block Caused by Itolizumab-induced Infusion Reaction in COVID-19. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(4):474–475.

Sir,Itolizumab, an anti-CD6 humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody, binds to domain-1 of CD-6 that is responsible for priming, activation, and differentiation of T-cells.^[1] It significantly reduces T-cell proliferation along with substantial downregulation of the production of cytokines/chemokines.¹ It was approved for moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis in 2013. However, it has recently been approved by the Drug Controller General of India for emergency use in India for the treatment of cytokine release syndrome in moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome patients due to COVID-19.² Here, we report a case of life-threatening infusion-related hypersensitivity reaction of itolizumab.A 65-year-old male COVID-19 patient got admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with complaints of shortness of breath and cough without any history of known disease. However, the baseline electrocardiogram (ECG) done in the ICU was suggestive of left bundle branch block (LBBB) (Fig. 1A). The patient was supported through noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and was started on remdesivir, dexamethasone, low-molecular-weight heparin, antibiotics, and other supportive treatment as per our institutional standard protocol. The patient was maintaining on continuous positive airway pressure mode of NIV with a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂) of 0.5 on the third day of ICU admission. Among the laboratory markers, the total leucocyte counts were raised (12,000/μL) with decreased lymphocytes (3.2%) and increased inflammatory markers (CRP, 320 mg/L; D dimer >20 μg/mL; LDH, 1694 U/L; IL6, 329 pg/mL). Serum electrolytes, renal function tests, liver function tests, and arterial blood gases were within acceptable limits. The patient was hemodynamically stable with a respiratory rate of 30 to 35/minute and a PO₂/FiO₂ ratio of 140. After taking informed written consent, inj. itolizumab was planned in this patient because of the increasing severity of the disease along with increased inflammatory markers. Inj. hydrocortisone 100 mg IV and inj. pheniramine 30 mg IV were given 30 minutes before itolizumab infusion. And 100 mg of itolizumab (Alzumab-L, Biocon Biologics) was diluted to 250 mL with normal saline and was started at 25 mL/hour. After about 20 minutes of infusion, the patient started complaining of shivering, sweating, and impending doom. The patient had sudden bronchospasm, and oxygen saturation dropped to 90%. ECG showed second-degree AV nodal block with an increased blood pressure of 180/110 mm Hg (Fig. 1B). The drug was immediately withdrawn and the patient was given a repeat dose of hydrocortisone and pheniramine along with other supportive measures. After sometime patients became alert and their respiratory symptoms were relieved. However, the second-degree heart block in ECG was persistent. ECHO was normal and troponin I was within normal limits while there was a slight increase in CPK-MB. The patient was observed closely and the ECG reverted to its previous state only after 24 hours. The patient was weaned from the ventilator in due course of time and put on face mask on the eighth day of stay.Open in a separate windowFigs 1A and B(A) Baseline ECG showing LBBB; (B) ECG showing second-degree AV nodal block after infusion reactionMost infusion reactions related to monoclonal antibodies are IgE mediated and are mild (grade 1 or 2) in nature.³ The incidence of severe (grade 3 or 4) reactions is generally low. The reported infusion-related reactions to itolizumab are chills/rigors (common), nausea, flushing, urticaria, cough, hypersensitivity, pruritus, rash, wheezing, dyspnea, oxygen desaturation, dizziness, headache, and hypertension. In our case, itolizumab infusion leads to a grade 4 reaction causing a persistent second-degree heart block for about 24 hours. Among the monoclonal antibodies, rituximab is most notorious for causing infusion reactions.⁴ There are only a few reports of cardiac arrhythmias (monomorphic VT, supraventricular tachycardia, trigeminy, and irregular pulse) during therapeutic infusion of rituximab,⁵ and there is no reported case of cardiac arrhythmia during itolizumab infusion. In our case, the patient was having LBBB and was on a QT prolonging drug (remdesivir), which might be a predisposing factor for the occurrence of second-degree heart block during infusion reaction. Premedications (e.g., antipyretics, antihistamines, and steroids) are recommended before the administration of some chemotherapeutic agents and monoclonal antibodies. These drugs should never be given as IV bolus and should always be given slowly in an infusion. Baseline assessments including vital signs and cognition should be documented carefully before the start of treatment and all the emergency equipment and drugs should be kept ready. Grade 3 and 4 reactions should be managed promptly with epinephrine, antihistaminics, and steroids along with other symptomatic supportive measures. As itolizumab is approved for emergency use in COVID-19, risk-benefit ratio should be assessed before prescribing this and should be explained before taking consent for infusion.The patient provided written informed consent for the publication.     

Meta-analysis of self-gripping mesh (Progrip) versus sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair

BackgroundThis metaanalysis was designed to systematically analyse all published randomized controlled trials comparing self-gripping mesh (ProGrip) and sutured mesh to analyse early and long term outcomes for open inguinal hernia repair.MethodsA literature search was performed using the Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase and Science Citation Index Expanded. Randomized trials comparing self-gripping mesh with sutured mesh were included. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager Version 5.2 software. The primary outcome measures were hernia recurrence and chronic pain after operation. Secondary outcome measures included surgical time, wound complications and perioperative complications.ResultsFive randomized trials were identified as suitable, including 1170 patients. There was no significant difference between the two types of mesh repairs in perioperative complications, wound haematoma, chronic groin pain and hernia recurrence. Wound infection was lower in self gripping mesh group compared to sutured mesh but this was not statistically significant (risk ratio (RR) 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.30–1.06, P = 0.08). The duration of operation was significantly shorter with self-gripping mesh compared to sutured mesh with a mean difference of ?5.48 min [?9.31, ?1.64] Z = 2.80 (P = 0.005).ConclusionSelf-gripping mesh was associated with shorter operative time compared to sutured mesh. Both types of mesh repairs have comparable perioperative and long term outcomes.     

Nutritional status of schoolgirls in Isfahan,Iran: Anthropometric and hematological measurements

Weights, heights and other anthropometric measurements are presented for seven year old schoolgirls belonging to different socioeconomic groups in Iran. It was found that measurements of the children of professional people were indistinguishable from internationally accepted standards. The measurements of girls in the lower socioeconomic strata were lower. Hematological measurements indicated lack of anemia in any of the children. Possible reasons for these findings are discussed in relation to previously published reports of nutritional problems in Iran.     

The Orthogeriatrics Model of Care: Systematic Review of Predictors of Institutionalization and Mortality in Post-Hip Fracture Patients and Evidence for Interventions

Hip fracture is a common serious complication of osteoporosis, which is associated with high morbidity and mortality. In nursing home residents, incidence rates of hip fractures are at least twice to three times higher than in community-dwellers of the same age and sex. Older adults with hip fracture have a 5- to 8-fold increased risk for all-cause mortality and much higher risk of institutionalization. Therefore, interventions to prevent institutionalization, prevent a second fracture in institutionalized patients, and decrease mortality after a hip fracture are highly needed. The orthogeriatrics model of care is a shared-care approach to patients after suffering a hip fracture. This program, which has been studied in models run by geriatricians with the assistance of a multidisciplinary team, includes a comprehensive medical and nursing admission assessment focusing on the patient’s premorbid function, cognition, comorbidities, and risks is followed by a comprehensive care plan design. This systematic review describes and analyzes the interrelation between hip fracture and nursing home placement taking into consideration those evidence-based interventions to prevent later complications and future institutionalization.