Immunization with a heat-killed bacterium,Mycobacterium vaccae NCTC 11659, prevents the development of cortical hyperarousal and a PTSD-like sleep phenotype after sleep disruption and acute stress in mice

Study ObjectivesSleep deprivation induces systemic inflammation that may contribute to stress vulnerability and other pathologies. We tested the hypothesis that immunization with heat-killed Mycobacterium vaccae NCTC 11659 (MV), an environmental bacterium with immunoregulatory and anti-inflammatory properties, prevents the negative impacts of 5 days of sleep disruption on stress-induced changes in sleep, behavior, and physiology in mice.MethodsIn a 2 × 2 × 2 experimental design, male C57BL/6N mice were given injections of either MV or vehicle on days –17, –10, and –3. On days 1–5, mice were exposed to intermittent sleep disruption, whereby sleep was disrupted for 20 h per day. Immediately following sleep disruption, mice were exposed to 1-h social defeat stress or novel cage (control) conditions. Object location memory (OLM) testing was conducted 24 h after social defeat, and tissues were collected 6 days later to measure inflammatory markers. Sleep was recorded using electroencephalography (EEG) and electromyography (EMG) throughout the experiment.ResultsIn vehicle-treated mice, only the combination of sleep disruption followed by social defeat (double hit): (1) increased brief arousals and NREM beta (15–30 Hz) EEG power in sleep immediately post-social defeat compared to baseline; (2) induced an increase in the proportion of rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep and number of state shifts for at least 5 days post-social defeat; and (3) induced hyperlocomotion and lack of habituation in the OLM task. Immunization with MV prevented most of these sleep and behavioral changes.ConclusionsImmunization with MV ameliorates a stress-induced sleep and behavioral phenotype that shares features with human posttraumatic stress disorder.     

Neuroplasticity in Corticolimbic Brain Regions in Patients After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

ContextFear has been cited as the primary barrier to return to sport (RTS) by athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Understanding the neural factors that contribute to fear after ACLR may help us to identify interventions for this population.ObjectiveTo characterize the underlying neural substrate of injury-related fear in patients after ACLR versus healthy matched control individuals during a picture imagination task (PIT) consisting of sport-specific images and images of activities of daily living (ADL).DesignCase-control study.SettingResearch laboratory.Patients or Other ParticipantsA total of 24 right-hand–dominant participants (12 with left-sided ACLR and 12 control individuals) were enrolled. Participants underwent full-brain functional magnetic resonance imaging.Main Outcome Measure(s)Functional data were acquired using blood oxygen level–dependent (BOLD) echoplanar imaging. Independent t tests were conducted to identify between-groups differences in BOLD signal changes during all images of the PIT. Paired t tests were computed to examine differences in BOLD signal change between sport-specific and ADL images in the ACLR group.ResultsIncreased activation in the inferior parietal lobule and the mediodorsal thalamus was observed during PIT in the ACLR group. An inability to suppress the default mode network in the ACLR group was noted. The ACLR group exhibited increased activation in the cerebellum and inferior occipital regions during the sport-specific images versus the ADL images, but no other regions of interest demonstrated differences.ConclusionAfter ACLR, patients may be more predisposed to fear, anxiety, and pain during sport-specific activities and ADLs. Psychosocial interventions may be warranted after ACLR to reduce injury-related fear and mitigate potentially maladaptive neuroplasticity.     

Therapeutic Interventions for Increasing Ankle Dorsiflexion After Ankle Sprain: A Systematic Review

Context:

Clinicians perform therapeutic interventions, such as stretching, manual therapy, electrotherapy, ultrasound, and exercises, to increase ankle dorsiflexion. However, authors of previous studies have not determined which intervention or combination of interventions is most effective.

Objective:

To determine the magnitude of therapeutic intervention effects on and the most effective therapeutic interventions for restoring normal ankle dorsiflexion after ankle sprain.

Data Sources:

We performed a comprehensive literature search in Web of Science and EBSCO HOST from 1965 to May 29, 2011, with 19 search terms related to ankle sprain, dorsiflexion, and intervention and by cross-referencing pertinent articles.

Study Selection:

Eligible studies had to be written in English and include the means and standard deviations of both pretreatment and posttreatment in patients with acute, subacute, or chronic ankle sprains. Outcomes of interest included various joint mobilizations, stretching, local vibration, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, electrical stimulation, and mental-relaxation interventions.

Data Extraction:

We extracted data on dorsiflexion improvements among various therapeutic applications by calculating Cohen d effect sizes with associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and evaluated the methodologic quality using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale.

Data Synthesis:

In total, 9 studies (PEDro score = 5.22 ± 1.92) met the inclusion criteria. Static-stretching interventions with a home exercise program had the strongest effects on increasing dorsiflexion in patients 2 weeks after acute ankle sprains (Cohen d = 1.06; 95% CI = 0.12, 2.42). The range of effect sizes for movement with mobilization on ankle dorsiflexion among individuals with recurrent ankle sprains was small (Cohen d range = 0.14 to 0.39).

Conclusions:

Static-stretching intervention as a part of standardized care yielded the strongest effects on dorsiflexion after acute ankle sprains. The existing evidence suggests that clinicians need to consider what may be the limiting factor of ankle dorsiflexion to select the most appropriate treatments and interventions. Investigators should examine the relationship between improvements in dorsiflexion and patient progress using measures of patient self-reported functional outcome after therapeutic interventions to determine the most appropriate forms of therapeutic interventions to address ankle-dorsiflexion limitation.Key Words: chronic ankle instability, range of motion, stretching, joint mobilization

Key Points

• A static-stretching intervention as part of a standardized home exercise program had the strongest effects on ankle-dorsiflexion improvement after acute ankle sprains.
• Clinicians need to consider what may be the limiting factor of ankle dorsiflexion to select the most appropriate treatments and interventions.
• Investigators should examine the long-term effects of treatments on ankle dorsiflexion and a relationship between an improvement in ankle dorsiflexion and measures of patient self-reported and physical function to determine the most appropriate forms of therapeutic interventions to address limited dorsiflexion.

Lateral ankle sprain has been documented to be the most common lower extremity injury sustained during sport participation.^1–4 Approximately 85% of all ankle sprains result from an inversion mechanism and damage to the lateral ligamentous complex of the ankle.⁵ Injury to the lateral ligamentous complex at the ankle joint results in pain, swelling, and limited osteokinematics.⁶ A loss of normal ankle dorsiflexion usually is observed at the talocrural joint after lateral ankle sprain.^7–12The amount of available ankle dorsiflexion plays a key role in the cause of lower extremity injuries.^7,13–22 Limitation of dorsiflexion may be a predisposition to reinjury of the ankle^11,16 and several future lower limb injuries, including plantar fasciopathy,^13,20,21 lateral ankle sprains,^13,15,17,19 iliotibial band syndrome,¹⁴ patellofemoral pain syndrome,¹⁸ patellar tendinopathy,²² and medial tibial stress syndrome.¹⁴The importance of restoring ankle dorsiflexion after an acute ankle sprain often is emphasized in rehabilitation guidelines,⁹ and proper recovery of ankle dorsiflexion is a vital component of ankle rehabilitation. Inadequate restoration of ankle dorsiflexion may increase the risk of developing recurrent ankle sprain^11,16 and limit functional activities, such as walking, with long-term pain and disability.²³ Limited ankle-dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) after lateral ankle sprain has been considered a predisposing factor for recurrent ankle sprain because diminished dorsiflexion prevents the ankle from reaching its closed-pack position by holding the ankle in a hypersupinated position. Therefore, ensuring appropriate restoration of ankle dorsiflexion after ankle sprain has important clinical implications for restoring full functional abilities, ultimately leading to reduced risk of recurrent ankle sprain.Clinicians perform several therapeutic interventions, such as stretching, manual therapy, electrotherapy, ultrasound, and exercises, to increase ankle dorsiflexion. However, the intervention or combination of interventions that most effectively improves ankle dorsiflexion has not been established. In previous systematic reviews,^24–26 researchers have examined the effects of specific intervention techniques of manipulative therapy on various outcome variables. In addition, Bleakley et al²⁷ conducted a systematic review with a comprehensive search of various therapeutic interventions to provide evidence for the management of ankle sprains and the prevention of long-term complications; however, the authors focused only on patients with an acute ankle sprain. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to determine the magnitude of therapeutic intervention effects on and the most effective therapeutic interventions for restoring normal ankle dorsiflexion after ankle sprain. In contrast to previous reviews,^24–26 we comprehensively searched the existing literature to determine the effectiveness of various therapeutic intervention techniques in restoring ankle dorsiflexion in patients with acute, subacute, or recurrent ankle sprains. By providing a quantitative estimate of the magnitude of the effect of therapeutic interventions, our review provides a new perspective on the evidence of interventions to restore ankle dorsiflexion in various stages of ankle-sprain conditions.     

Different Modes of Feedback and Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force During Jump Landing: A Systematic Review

Context:

Excessive ground reaction force when landing from a jump may result in lower extremity injuries. It is important to better understand how feedback can influence ground reaction force (GRF) and potentially reduce injury risk.

Objective:

To determine the effect of expert-provided (EP), self-analysis (SA), and combination EP and SA (combo) feedback on reducing peak vertical GRF during a jump-landing task.

Data Sources:

We searched the Web of Science database on July 1, 2011; using the search terms ground reaction force, landing biomechanics, and feedback elicited 731 initial hits.

Study Selection:

Of the 731 initial hits, our final analysis included 7 studies that incorporated 32 separate data comparisons.

Data Extraction:

Standardized effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated between pretest and posttest scores for each feedback condition.

Data Synthesis:

We found a homogeneous beneficial effect for combo feedback, indicating a reduction in GRF with no CIs crossing zero. We also found a homogeneous beneficial effect for EP feedback, but the CIs from 4 of the 10 data comparisons crossed zero. The SA feedback showed strong, definitive effects when the intervention included a videotape SA, with no CIs crossing zero.

Conclusions:

Of the 7 studies reviewed, combo feedback seemed to produce the greatest decrease in peak vertical GRF during a jump-landing task.Key Words: injury prevention, knee, feedback, landing biomechanics

Key Points

• All modes of feedback effectively reduced ground reaction force during a jump-landing task.
• Combination feedback demonstrated the strongest effect sizes for reducing ground reaction force compared with expert-provided and self-analysis feedback.
• More high-quality studies are needed to support the use of feedback interventions for altering lower extremity landing forces and decreasing lower extremity injury risk.

Landing is an essential athletic task used during many different sporting activities, including basketball, volleyball, and gymnastics.^1–3 The act of jumping and landing during these different sporting activities involves different magnitudes of ground reaction forces (GRFs).⁴ The GRF magnitudes have been reported to be greatest during the landing phase of a jump when the knee is between 0° and 25° of flexion, a point at which the knee must resist a rapid change in kinetic energy.⁵ Excessive GRFs may result in lower extremity injuries.^3,6–8The knee is largely responsible for energy attenuation of the lower extremity when landing from a jump,^9,10 so this joint may have increased susceptibility to injury during such a task. Researchers have identified the presence of damage to the subchondral bone, cartilage, and soft tissue due to extreme forces imposed on the lower extremity during selected landing activities.¹¹ A positive moderate correlation between increased vertical GRF and increased anterior tibial acceleration when landing from a jump supports the hypothesis that individuals landing with greater impact loads could have an increased risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury.¹² Given that the main function of the ACL is preventing anterior translation of the tibia, landing with increased GRF and thus increased anterior tibial acceleration may place more strain on the ligament, increasing the likelihood of ligament rupture.To reduce the risk of injury associated with increased GRF during landing, different interventions have been used to decrease GRF by altering lower extremity biomechanics during landing. To our knowledge, no researchers have evaluated whether reducing an individual''s GRF decreases his or her risk of injury, but compelling data have suggested that higher GRF and other factors may increase the risk of substantially injuring the knee.¹³ Specifically, prospective data have shown that GRF during a jump-landing task was 20% higher in female athletes who sustained an ACL rupture than in athletes who did not.¹³ These data spark a compelling but unsubstantiated theory that reducing high GRFs may coincide with a decreased risk of knee injury. Clinical trials to evaluate the true prophylactic capabilities of reducing GRF to limit knee injuries are likely expensive and logistically difficult to conduct. Therefore, successfully identifying an intervention that can manipulate GRF is important before these studies are performed.Various methods have been implemented to teach proper landing biomechanics to prevent future injury.¹⁴ For example, feedback is a modality used to prompt an individual to correct potentially harmful biomechanics and reduce high GRF. Feedback can be defined as sensory information made available to the participant during or after a task in an attempt to alter a movement.¹⁵ It can include information related to the sensations associated with the movement (eg, the feel or sound the participant experiences while performing the task) or related to the result of the action with respect to the environmental goal.¹⁵ Different modes of feedback have been reported and include (1) expert-provided (EP) feedback through oral correction,¹⁶ oral instruction,^17,18 or visual demonstration¹⁶; (2) self-analysis (SA) feedback conducted with videotape correction^19,20 or self-correction from previous trials¹⁷; and (3) combination (combo) feedback that uses both EP and SA feedback.^19,21 Through EP feedback, professionals can analyze movements and provide various forms of oral and visual feedback to alter that task, whereas SA feedback requires the participant to identify movement characteristics that need to be altered and to adjust to change that specific task.Recently, a surge of injury-prevention programs have been implemented to reduce the risk of ACL injury in athletes.^22,23 These programs often incorporate feedback techniques and aim to reduce the risk of injury by teaching athletes to land properly to reduce stress on the lower extremity and potentially prevent acute and chronic lower extremity injuries.¹⁹ Altering the landing phase of a jump via various feedback methods could result in decreased GRFs and increased flexion angles at the knee, which may decrease the risk of lower extremity injury.Although programs incorporating feedback are increasing in popularity, the magnitude of the effect that different types of feedback have on reducing GRF has not been evaluated systematically. Knowledge of the efficacy of feedback on reducing potentially harmful GRF may help clinicians determine whether feedback should be incorporated into jump-landing training programs. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to systematically evaluate the current literature to determine the magnitude of immediate and delayed effects of EP, SA, and combo feedback interventions on reducing peak vertical GRF during a jump-landing task in healthy individuals.     

The Immediate Effects of Foam Rolling and Stretching on Iliotibial Band Stiffness: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundIliotibial Band Syndrome (ITBS) is a common clinical condition likely caused by abnormal compressive forces to the iliotibial band (ITB). Stretching interventions are common in ITBS treatment and may predominantly affect tensor fascia latae (TFL). Another ITBS treatment is foam rolling, which may more directly affect the ITB. Shear wave ultrasound elastography (SWUE) measures real-time soft tissue stiffness, allowing tissue changes to be measured and compared.PurposeTo examine effects of foam rolling and iliotibial complex stretching on ITB stiffness at 0˚ and 10˚ of hip adduction and hip adduction passive range of motion (PROM).Study DesignRandomized controlled trial.MethodsData from 11 males (age = 30.5 ± 9.0 years, Body Mass Index (BMI) = 27.8 ± 4.0) and 19 females (age = 23.5 ± 4.9, BMI = 23.2 ± 2.1) were analyzed for this study. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of three groups: control, stretching, and foam rolling. Shear wave ultrasound elastography measurements included ITB Young’s modulus at the mid-thigh, the distal femur and the TFL muscle belly. ITB-to-femur depth was measured at mid-thigh level. Hip adduction PROM was measured from digital images taken during the movement.ResultsNo significant interactions or main effects were found for group or time differences in ITB Young’s modulus at the three measured locations. The ITB stiffness at the mid-thigh and distal femur increased with 10° adduction, but TFL stiffness did not increase. A main effect for adduction PROM was observed, where PROM increased 0.8˚ post-treatment (p = 0.02).ConclusionA single episode of stretching and foam rolling does not affect short-term ITB stiffness. The lack of ITB stiffness changes may be from an inadequate intervention stimulus or indicate that the interventions have no impact on ITB stiffness.Levels of Evidence1b     

Estimation of pulse pressure variation and cardiac output in patients having major abdominal surgery: a comparison between a mobile application for snapshot pulse wave analysis and invasive pulse wave analysis

Pulse pressure variation (PPV) and cardiac output (CO) can guide perioperative fluid management. Capstesia (Galenic App, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain) is a mobile application for snapshot pulse wave analysis (PWAsnap) and estimates PPV and CO using pulse wave analysis of a snapshot of the arterial blood pressure waveform displayed on any patient monitor. We evaluated the PPV and CO measurement performance of PWAsnap in adults having major abdominal surgery. In a prospective study, we simultaneously measured PPV and CO using PWAsnap installed on a tablet computer (PPV_PWAsnap, CO_PWAsnap) and using invasive internally calibrated pulse wave analysis (ProAQT; Pulsion Medical Systems, Feldkirchen, Germany; PPV_ProAQT, CO_ProAQT). We determined the diagnostic accuracy of PPV_PWAsnap in comparison to PPV_ProAQT according to three predefined PPV categories and by computing Cohen’s kappa coefficient. We compared CO_ProAQT and CO_PWAsnap using Bland-Altman analysis, the percentage error, and four quadrant plot/concordance rate analysis to determine trending ability. We analyzed 190 paired PPV and CO measurements from 38 patients. The overall diagnostic agreement between PPV_PWAsnap and PPV_ProAQT across the three predefined PPV categories was 64.7% with a Cohen’s kappa coefficient of 0.45. The mean (±?standard deviation) of the differences between CO_PWAsnap and CO_ProAQT was 0.6?±?1.3 L min^??1 (95% limits of agreement 3.1 to ??1.9 L min^??1) with a percentage error of 48.7% and a concordance rate of 45.1%. In adults having major abdominal surgery, PPV_PWAsnap moderately agrees with PPV_ProAQT. The absolute and trending agreement between CO_PWAsnap with CO_ProAQT is poor. Technical improvements are needed before PWAsnap can be recommended for hemodynamic monitoring.

     

CT differentiation of enlarged mediastinal lymph node due to anthracosis from metastatic lymphadenopathy: a comparative study proven by endobronchial US-guided transbronchial needle aspiration

PURPOSE

Anthracosis often results in mediastinal nodal enlargement. The aim of this comparative study was to evaluate if it is possible to differentiate endobronchial ultrasound-guided trans-bronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) proven anthracotic lymph nodes from malignant lymph node enlargement by means of multislice computed tomography (MSCT).

METHODS

We compared the MSCT findings of 89 enlarged lymph nodes due to anthracosis with 54 malignant lymph nodes (non-small cell lung cancer 75.9%, small cell lung cancer 18.5%, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma 5.6%). The lymph nodes were assessed for density (calcification, fat, and necrosis), shape (oval, round), contrast enhancement, and contour (sharp, ill-defined).

RESULTS

Malignant lymph nodes showed significantly greater axis diameters (P < 0.001). Both anthracotic and malignant nodes were most often oval (86.5% of all malignant nodes vs. 81.5% of all anthracotic nodes, P = 0.420) and showed confluence in a remarkable percentage (28.1% vs. 42.6%, P = 0.075). Anthracotic nodes showed calcifications more often (18% vs. 0%, P < 0.001). Malignant lymph nodes showed a significantly greater short and long axis diameter (P < 0.001), and they had a higher frequency of ill-defined contours (27.8% vs. 2.2%, P < 0.001) and contrast enhancement (27.8% vs. 5.6%, P < 0.001). Nodal necrosis, which appeared in one third of the malignant nodes, was not observed in anthracosis (35.2% vs. 0%, P < 0.001). Confluence of enlarged lymph nodes was seen in malignant lymph nodes (42.6%), as well as in lymph node enlargement due to anthracosis (28.1%, P = 0.075).

CONCLUSION

Our results show that there are significant differences in MSCT findings of malignant enlarged lymph nodes and benign lymph node enlargement due to anthracosis.Anthracosis is characterized by alterations not only of the lung parenchyma and bronchioles but also of the lymphatic system, resulting in chronic lymphadenopathy and nodal enlargement (1). Since finding of enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes on computed tomography (CT) may raise the suspicion of metastasis in patients with a known primary neoplasm (2, 3), and lymph node anthracosis may appear as false positive on positron emission tomography (PET) (4–6), it can confuse clinicians in staging of lung cancer patients.The aim of this comparative study of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and chest CT was to evaluate whether it is possible to differentiate enlarged anthracotic lymph nodes from malignant lymph node enlargement by means of CT. To the best of our knowledge, this study seems to be the first to deal with the differential diagnosis of enlarged anthracotic and malignant lymph nodes in this setting.