煅石膏的研究进展及含钙止血材料应用概况

矿物药是传统中医药的重要组成部分，具有悠久的应用历史。其中矿物止血药对多种出血病证的临床应用广泛、用药经验丰富且疗效显著。石膏作为临床常用的矿物药，生石膏的功效为清热泻火、除烦止渴，而煅石膏为生石膏经高温煅烧的炮制品，主要由无水硫酸钙（CaSO₄）组成，具有收湿、生肌、敛疮、止血的功效，常外用于治疗溃疡不敛、湿疹瘙痒、水火烫伤、外伤出血等。止血机制研究表明，Ca²⁺作为凝血因子Ⅳ参与凝血过程的内外凝血级联多个关键环节，并且参与调节血小板活化、聚集，促进生成不溶性纤维蛋白，最终形成血凝块防止出血。Ca²⁺是重要的止血物质基础，但是石膏、煅石膏均含有Ca²⁺，煅石膏具有显著的止血作用，而石膏没有止血作用，石膏经过炮制后性味、功效发生了明显改变，体现了炮制特色，但目前尚未完全阐明煅石膏的炮制机制。因此，该文对石膏煅制前后比较研究情况进行总结与分析，围绕煅制工艺、晶型比较、元素含量、药效比较等进行综述，并总结Ca²⁺参与止血的各个环节。此外，对其他含钙矿物药及新型含钙止血材料如海藻酸钙、介孔硅酸钙和纳米凝胶止血材料的止血性能进行探讨，以期为阐明煅石膏的炮制机制提供借鉴，为临床辨证使用煅石膏提供依据，并为后续新型含钙止血材料的开发提供借鉴。     

Brand-Name Antidepressants Outperform Their Generic Counterparts in Preventing Hospitalization for Depression: The Real-World Evidence from Taiwan

BackgroundGeneric antidepressants are approved on the market based on evidence of bioequivalence to their brand-name versions. We aimed to assess whether generic antidepressants exert equal effectiveness as their brand-name counterparts for treating patients with depressive disorders.MethodsIn a nationwide, population-based cohort in Taiwan from 1997 through 2013, patients with a diagnosis of a depressive disorder aged between 18 and 65 years who were new users of antidepressant drugs were classified into either the brand-name group or the generic group. All patients were followed up until medication discontinuation or the end of the study period. We assessed the risk for hospitalization as a primary outcome and augmentation therapy, daily dose, medication discontinuation, or switching to another antidepressant as secondary outcomes.ResultsA total of 277 651 brand-name users (35.8% male; mean age: 41.2 years) and 270 583 generic users (35.8% male; mean age: 41.0 years) were divided into 10 different antidepressant groups (fluoxetine, sertraline, paroxetine, escitalopram, citalopram, venlafaxine, mirtazapine, moclobemide, imipramine, and bupropion). We found that patients treated with the generic form of sertraline, paroxetine, escitalopram, venlafaxine, mirtazapine, and bupropion demonstrated significantly higher risks of psychiatric hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratios ranged from 1.20–2.34), compared to their brand-name counterparts. The differences between brand-name antidepressants and their generic counterparts in secondary outcomes varied across different drugs.ConclusionsCompared to most generic antidepressants, brand-name drugs exhibited more protective effects on psychiatric hospitalization for depressive patients. These findings could serve as an important reference for clinicians when encountering patients with depressive disorder.