Fertility Outcome After Renal Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience

BackgroundWomen suffering from kidney disease are more prone to fertility problems, due to uremia. Fortunately, their fertility rate increases dramatically after renal transplantation. This study analyzes the predictors/risk factors of successful pregnancy with live birth outcome while presenting an overview of the 7-year experience of a single center.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study includes 239 women of reproductive age (18–40 years) who underwent renal transplantation in a tertiary Turkish clinic between October 1, 2011, and August 24, 2017. The subjects were invited to take part in a survey questioning their obstetric characteristics and they were assessed in 2 groups: fertile and infertile. Multivariable linear regression analysis was conducted to determine the predictors of a successful pregnancy.ResultsThirty-five 35 patients wished to become pregnant: 12 got pregnant spontaneously, while 21 failed to become pregnant (spontaneously). The mean age of the patients at the survey was 34 ± 7. Regular menstrual cycles after renal transplantation, tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil maintenance protocol, and age at transplantation were found to be predictors of spontaneous pregnancy. The duration of peritoneal dialysis was significantly longer in the infertile group (48 vs 12 months).ConclusionEnd-stage renal disease's negative impacts, including menstrual abnormality and fertility problems, can be overcome by successful kidney transplantation with appropriate immunosuppression. Minimizing the duration of peritoneal dialysis, particularly in patients who desire future fertility, may be accepted as a logical management strategy.     

GENIPSO: a French prospective study assessing instantaneous prevalence,clinical features and impact on quality of life of genital psoriasis among patients consulting for psoriasis

Psoriasis is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease, affecting about 3% of the general population and approximately 2.5 million people in France, where this study took place. The genital area may be affected, however prevalence is poorly understood, meaning we do not know exactly how commonly this occurs. While it affects quality of life, genital psoriasis is under-recognized, probably due to the reluctance of patients to discuss genital involvement and sexual quality of life. The aims of this study, called the GENIPSO study, were to determine the prevalence of genital psoriasis, its clinical characteristics (its symptoms), whether it is associated with a particular type of psoriasis, and its impact on quality of life. The study included 776 adults seeing their doctor for psoriasis between November 2016 and March 2017. Among them, 336 (43.2%) had genital psoriasis. All these patients were aware that they had psoriasis on their genitals (genital lesions) but only 135 (40%) had already had a genital medical examination. Genital lesions were associated with (linked to) male gender, more severe psoriasis, first developing psoriasis when aged over 20 years, psoriasis of the skin folds, psoriasis on the scalp, nail and external auditory (ear) canal, but they were not associated with obesity or psoriatic arthritis. Itching was the main symptom. Genital psoriasis was associated with reduced quality of life and sexual health. The study found that genital psoriasis has a high prevalence in patients seeing their doctors about their psoriasis generally, it affects quality of life and should be better taken into account by dermatologists for the best possible care for patients.     

Tanzania IR Initiative: Training the First Generation of Interventional Radiologists

Despite a population of nearly 60 million, there is currently not a single interventional radiologist in Tanzania. Based on an Interventional Radiology (IR) Readiness Assessment, the key obstacles to establishing IR in Tanzania are the lack of training opportunities and limited availability of disposable equipment. An IR training program was designed and initiated, which relies on US-based volunteer teams of IR physicians, nurses, and technologists to locally train radiology residents, nurses, and technologists. Preliminary results support this strategy for addressing the lack of training opportunities and provide a model for introducing IR to other resource-limited settings.