Influence of body mass and height on the energy cost of running in highly trained middle- and long-distance runners

Previous studies about the influence of body dimensions on running economy have not compared athletes specialized in different competition events. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to assess the influence of body mass (m(b)) and height (h) on the energy cost of running (Cr) in 38 highly trained male runners, specialized in either marathon (M, n = 12), long middle-distance (5000 - 10000 m, LMD, n = 14) or short middle-distance (800 - 1500 m, SMD, n = 12), and to assess possible differences in body dimensions for each event. Subjects performed a progressive maximal exercise on the treadmill to determine oxygen uptake VO(2)) at different submaximal velocities and maximal oxygen uptake VO(2)max). Cr was calculated from VO(2) measurements. LMD runners had significantly higher mean Cr (0.192 +/- 0.007, 0.182 +/- 0.009, and 0.180 +/- 0.009 ml O(2) x kg(-1) x m(-1) for LMD, M and SMD, respectively) and VO(2)max (74.1 +/- 3.7, 68.5 +/- 2.9 and 69.7 +/- 3.4 ml x kg (-1) x min (-1)). Cr correlated with h (r = -0.86, p < 0.001) and m(b) (r = -0.77, p < 0.01) only in the SMD group. In conclusion, these data suggest that highly trained distance runners tend to show counterbalancing profiles of running economy and VO(2)max (the higher Cr, the higher VO(2) max and vice versa), and that anthropometric characteristics related with good performance are different in long-distance and middle-distance events.     

Validity of a velodrome test for competitive road cyclists

The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of a velodrome field test consisting of repeated rides of 2,280 m, with an initial speed of 28 km·h^–1 and increments of 1.5 km·h^–1 interspersed with 1-min recovery periods until exhaustion. A group of 12 male competitive road cyclists performed maximal cycling tests under velodrome and laboratory conditions. Velodrome oxygen uptake ( O₂) and power output were estimated using equations previously published. Physiological responses to the two tests were compared. Relationships between performance in the velodrome and physiological parameters measured in the laboratory were studied. Maximal power output, heart rate and O₂ were similar in the velodrome and the laboratory [372 (SD 50) vs 365 (SD 36) W, 195 (SD 8) vs 196 (SD 9) beats·min^–1 and 4.49 (SD 0.56) vs 4.49 (SD 0.46) l·min^–1, respectively], while maximal velodrome blood lactate concentration was significantly higher [13.5 (SD 2.1) vs 11.8 (SD 3.1) mmol·l^–1]. Velodrome heart rate was higher at submaximal exercise intensities representing 40%, 50% and 60% of maximal aerobic power, and velodrome blood lactate concentration was also higher at 60%, 70% and 80% of maximal aerobic power. The laboratory parameter that showed the highest correlation with the maximal cycling speed in the velodrome was maximal oxygen uptake ( O_2max) expressed per unit of body mass (r = 0.93). In addition, the accuracy of different methods of estimation of the metabolic cost of cycling, rolling resistance, air resistance coefficients and O_2max were compared. Significant differences were found. In conclusion, the present results indicated the validity of a velodrome test used to estimate maximal aerobic parameters of competitive road cyclists, as long as the estimation is made using established equations. When road cyclists are tested in the laboratory, physiological values should be expressed per unit of body surface area or body mass, to predict more accurately the cyclist's performance level under specific field conditions.