Physician evaluation after medical errors: does having a computer decision aid help or hurt in hindsight?

OBJECTIVE: The authors examined whether physicians' use of computerized decision aids affects patient satisfaction and/or blame for medical outcomes. METHOD: Experiment 1: Fifty-nine undergraduates read about a doctor who made either a correct or incorrect diagnosis and either used a decision aid or did not. All rated the quality of the doctor's decision and the likelihood of recommending the doctor. Those receiving a negative outcome also rated negligence and likelihood of suing. Experiment 2: One hundred sixty-six medical students and 154 undergraduates read negative-outcome scenarios in which a doctor either agreed with the aid, heeded the aid against his own opinion, defied the aid in favor of his own opinion, or did not use a decision aid. Subjects rated doctor fault and competence and the appropriateness of using decision aids in medicine. Medical students made judgments for themselves and for a layperson. RESULTS: Experiment 1: Using a decision aid caused a positive outcome to be rated less positively and a negative outcome to be rated less negatively. Experiment 2: Agreeing with or heeding the aid was associated with reduced fault, whereas defying the aid was associated with roughly the same fault as not using one at all. Medical students were less harsh than undergraduates but accurately predicted undergraduate's responses. CONCLUSION: Agreeing with or heeding a decision aid, but not defying it, may reduce liability after an error. However, using an aid may reduce favorability after a positive outcome.     

A school microepidemic of tuberculosis.

BACKGROUND: Microepidemics of tuberculosis continue to occur in countries with a low incidence of tuberculosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: A microepidemic of tuberculosis in a secondary school with 604 girls in Cork city, Ireland, in 1986 with follow up to 1990 is described. Neonatal BCG vaccination was discontinued in the city in December 1972 so most of the 342 pupils who had received BCG were aged 14 years or more. Six active cases and 75 tuberculin positive cases were found. Four of the six girls with active disease had had neonatal BCG. The 75 pupils with a positive (grade 3 or 4) Heaf test response were given chemoprophylaxis with rifampicin and isoniazid for six months; none had developed active tuberculosis four years later. The brother of the girl who was the probable index case, however, developed active tuberculosis in 1988 despite similar chemoprophylaxis. CONCLUSION: The episode highlights the fact that children who have had neonatal BCG can develop active tuberculosis as teenagers.     

Does antenatal identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses significantly improve their outcome?

OBJECTIVES: Most obstetric clinics have a program for the identification of small-for-gestational age (SGA) fetuses because of the increased risk of fetal complications that they present. We have a structured model for the identification and follow-up of SGA pregnancies. We aimed to determine whether the recognition of SGA antepartum improves fetal outcome. METHODS: All pregnancies at Malm? University Hospital from 1990 to 1998 (n = 26 968) were reviewed. SGA fetuses identified prior to delivery (n = 681) were compared with those not identified (n = 573). Also, all pregnancies with SGA fetuses were compared with those appropriate-for-gestational age (AGA) (n = 24 585). The risk of serious fetal complications (hypoxic encephalopathy grade 2 or 3, intracranial hemorrhage, Apgar score <4 at 5 min, neonatal convulsions, umbilical pH <7.0, cerebral palsy, mental retardation, stillbirth, intrapartum or infant death) was assessed with cross-tabulation and logistic regression analysis, adjusted for gestational age and degree of SGA. RESULTS: When compared with SGA fetuses identified before delivery (54%), SGA fetuses not identified before delivery were characterized by a four-fold increased risk of adverse fetal outcome (odds ratio, 4.1; 95% CI, 2.5-6.8). Similarly, compared with AGA fetuses, SGA fetuses were associated with a four-fold increased risk of serious fetal complications. CONCLUSIONS: A structured antenatal surveillance program for fetuses identified as SGA results in a lower risk of adverse fetal outcome, compared with cases of SGA fetuses not identified antepartum.     

Reengineering transfusion and cellular therapy processes hospitalwide: ensuring the safe utilization of blood products

Efforts to make blood transfusion as safe as possible have focused on making the blood in the bag as disease-free as possible. The results have been dramatic, and the costs have been correspondingly high. Although blood services will have to continue to deal with emerging pathogens, efforts to reduce the transfusion of infectious agents presently posing a risk will require high incremental costs and result in only improvements of a small magnitude.
The other aspect of safe blood transfusion, the actual transfusion process performed primarily in hospitals, has been accorded considerably less interest. We should turn our attention to enhancing overall blood safety by focusing on improving the process of blood transfusion. Errors involving patient, specimen, and blood product identification put transfused patients at risk, increasing the mortality risk for some. Solutions that could improve the transfusion process are discussed as a focus of this article.     

Botulinum toxin and medical liability: is the patient sufficiently informed?]

INTRODUCTION: The use of botulinum toxin injection therapy is soaring significantly today, with an ever-wider field of applications despite well-known side effects of the treatment. This article aims at analysing the medicolegal practices of practitioners who use this therapy, especially the information given to patients and finding a common practice for providing that information. METHODS: We sent a questionnaire to 340 practitioners who might use the therapy (physiatrists, neurologists, ophthalmologists, ENT specialists, plastic surgeons) working in hospitals and in physical therapy and rehabilitation centres in France. Besides mentioning the possible side effects of the therapy, the questionnaire focused on how such information was transmitted before the injection. RESULTS: Data collection and analysis were performed by use of a spreadsheet software programme. A total of 124 questionnaires were analysed. We did not analyse the items dealing with side effects. Sixty-five percent of the responders said they did not seek statutory authorisation for injections. Only 31% provided written, detailed information and 12% required a signed consent form. Complaints were rare, approximately 12%, were written or verbal, and were always dismissed. DISCUSSION: Side effects after botulinum toxin injection are clearly described in the medical literature. Therefore, it is of utmost importance for this product to be used therapeutically and only by experienced therapists who will carefully respect the product's standard rules of use and inform their patients to the best of their ability. Issuing a detailed letter of information describing all the side effects seems necessary. We suggest a model information letter such as that provided to the patients in our facility. CONCLUSION: Botulinum toxin is a very worthwhile product for numerous abnormalities but has side effects, often brief, at the site of the injection. Therefore it is our duty to inform patients effectively.