Long interval between HCV infection and development of hepatocellular carcinoma

Abstract: A high prevalence of HCV infection has been reported in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. The progression from acute transfusion-associated hepatitis to hepatic cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma has been suggested in several studies to be very long. We have investigated the prevalence of anti-HCV and the interval between HCV infection and hepatocellular carcinoma among 191 consecutive patients with cirrhosis and liver-cell carcinoma. Serum samples from 191 patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, consecutively diagnosed in our hospital between 1988 and 1993, were tested for serological markers of HBV and HCV infection. One hundred and forty-eight patients (77.5%; 95% confidence interval (c.i): 76% to 80%) were anti-HCV positive by 2nd generation enzyme immunoassay (confirmed by 2nd generation recombinant immunoblot assay) and 152 patients (79.5%; 95% c.i: 76% to 80%) were anti-HCV positive by 3rd generation enzyme immunoassay, while only 14 (7.4%; 95% c.i: 5% to 10%) were HBsAg positive. Of the 29 anti-HCV positive patients with previous transfusion, the interval between the date of blood transfusion and the diagnosis of hepatic cirrhosis was 24±12.5 years and that of hepatocellular carcinoma was 26.8±12.4 years. These results confirm the high prevalence of HCV infection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and the slow sequential progression from HCV infection through cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.     

Evaluación de la validez de las funciones SCORE de bajo riesgo y calibrada para población española en las cohortes FRESCO

Introduction and objectives

To assess the validity of the original low-risk SCORE function without and with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and SCORE calibrated to the Spanish population.

Recommendations from GESIDA/SEFH/PNS to improve adherence to antiviral treatment (2004)

Since the early days of antiretroviral therapy, adherence has emerged as the milestone of success; in fact, it is the most potent predictor of effectiveness. The main factors related to adherence include the complexity of the therapeutic regimen, adverse effects, psychological problems, alcoholism and active addiction to drugs, lack of social and family support and the patient's beliefs and attitudes about the treatment. Adherence monitoring should be part of the HIV patient's regular care, and should be done with feasible, easily applied methods adapted to the different clinical settings. The minimally acceptable measures should include use of a validated questionnaire, together with data from the Pharmacy Department's drug dispensation registry. All patients that begin HAART or undergo a change of treatment should participate in a treatment education program imparted by health professionals with knowledge and experience in the management of patients with HIV infection. The health team (doctors, pharmacists and nursing professionals) should offer maximum availability to solve the doubts and problems that may occur during treatment. When sub-optimal adherence is detected, intervention strategies based on psychological therapy, educational efforts and personal advice should be attempted, in order to adapt the treatment scheme to the patient's habits and provide solutions to the problem of non-compliance. In certain situations, co-morbid conditions will also require attention. Treatment adherence, being a multidimensional problem, needs a multidisciplinary team approach. The choice of therapy, only one aspect of the multidimensional problem of adherence, must be a careful and individualized decision; however, simpler regimens with regard to the number of pills and daily dose are desirable.     

Salivary Secretory Disorders,Inducing Drugs,and Clinical Management

Background: Salivary secretory disorders can be the result of a wide range of factors. Their prevalence and negative effects on the patient''s quality of life oblige the clinician to confront the issue.Aim: To review the salivary secretory disorders, inducing drugs and their clinical management.Methods: In this article, a literature search of these dysfunctions was conducted with the assistance of a research librarian in the MEDLINE/PubMed Database.Results: Xerostomia, or dry mouth syndrome, can be caused by medication, systemic diseases such as Sjögren''s Syndrome, glandular pathologies, and radiotherapy of the head and neck. Treatment of dry mouth is aimed at both minimizing its symptoms and preventing oral complications with the employment of sialogogues and topical acting substances. Sialorrhea and drooling, are mainly due to medication or neurological systemic disease. There are various therapeutic, pharmacologic, and surgical alternatives for its management. The pharmacology of most of the substances employed for the treatment of salivary disorders is well-known. Nevertheless, in some cases a significant improvement in salivary function has not been observed after their administration.Conclusion: At present, there are numerous frequently prescribed drugs whose unwanted effects include some kind of salivary disorder. In addition, the differing pathologic mechanisms, and the great variety of existing treatments hinder the clinical management of these patients.The authors have designed an algorithm to facilitate the decision making process when physicians, oral surgeons, or dentists face these salivary dysfunctions.