Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Laparoscopic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Background

The advantages of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) over laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) have rarely been investigated in randomised controlled trials.

Objective

To compare RARP and LRP in terms of the functional, perioperative, and oncologic outcomes. The main end point of the study was changes in continence 3 mo after surgery.

Design, setting, and participants

From January 2010 to January 2011, 120 patients with organ-confined prostate cancer were enrolled and randomly assigned (using a randomisation plan) to one of two groups based on surgical approach: the RARP group and the LRP group.

Intervention

All RARP and LRP interventions were performed with the same technique by the same single surgeon.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

The demographic, perioperative, and pathologic results, such as the complications and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurements, were recorded and compared. Continence was evaluated at the time of catheter removal and 48 h later, and continence and potency were evaluated after 1, 3, 6, and 12 mo. The student t test, Mann-Whitney test, χ² test, Pearson χ² test, and multiple regression analysis were used for statistics.

Results and limitations

The two groups (RARP: n = 60; LRP: n = 60) were comparable in terms of demographic data. No differences were recorded in terms of perioperative and pathologic results, complication rate, or PSA measurements. The continence rate was higher in the RARP group at every time point: Continence after 3 mo was 80% in the RARP group and 61.6% in the LRP group (p = 0.044), and after 1 yr, the continence rate was 95.0% and 83.3%, respectively (p = 0.042). Among preoperative potent patients treated with nerve-sparing techniques, the rate of erection recovery was 80.0% and 54.2%, respectively (p = 0.020). The limitations included the small number of patients.

Conclusions

RARP provided better functional results in terms of the recovery of continence and potency. Further studies are needed to confirm our results.     

Hospital volume, margin status, and long-term survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma

An association between hospital surgical volume and short- and long-term outcomes after pancreatic surgery has been demonstrated. Identification of specific factors contributing to this relationship is difficult. In this study, the authors evaluated if margin status can be identified as a measure of surgical quality, affecting overall survival, as a function of hospital pancreaticoduodenectomy volume. A systematic review of the literature was performed. Two models for analysis were created, dividing the 18 studies identified into quartiles and two quantiles based on the average annual hospital pancreatectomy volume. Regression modeling and analysis of variance were used to find an association between hospital volume, margin status, and survival. Increasing hospital volume was associated with a significantly increased negative margin status rate: 55 per cent for low-volume, 72 per cent for medium-volume, 74.3 per cent for high-volume, and 75.7 per cent for very high-volume centers (P = 0.008). The negative margin status rates were 64 per cent and 75.1 per cent for volume centers with less and more than 12 pancreaticoduodenectomies/year, respectively (P = 0.04). Low-volume centers negatively affected both margin positive resection and 5-year survival rates, compared with high-volume centers. Margin status rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy could, therefore, be considered a measure of quality for selection of hospitals dedicated to pancreatic surgery.     

Valgus extension femoral osteotomy to treat “hinge abduction” in Perthes’ disease

Purpose

“Hinge abduction” is a complication of Perthes’ disease caused by impingement of the extruded superolateral portion of the femoral head against the lateral lip of the acetabulum. Catterall first described femoral valgus extension osteotomy (VGEO) to treat this condition. We report the results of this operation in 16 cases of Perthes’ disease with “hinge abduction”.

Methods

Sixteen hips in 16 patients affected by Perthes’ disease and “hinge abduction” were operated on at a mean age of 10.1 years and followed up an average of 6.5 years later. Before surgery, the mean Iowa hip score was 44.4 points. Preoperative radiographs were taken with the affected hip in maximum adduction in order to calculate the amount of valgus correction. The osteotomy was performed between the greater and the lesser trochanter, and it was fixed with a hip plate.

Results

All the osteotomies healed uneventfully. At follow-up, no patient complained of pain and hip abduction ranged from 20° to 45°. Four out of the 16 patients had a moderate limp, and 12 had an improvement in gait pattern compared to preoperatively. At follow-up, the Iowa hip score totaled a mean of 83.6 points, with a statistically significant improvement in comparison to the preoperative evaluation. At follow-up, two hips were classified as Stulberg II–III, ten hips as Stulberg III, and four as Stulberg IV.

Conclusions

In our hands, VGEO was an effective procedure to treat “hinge abduction” in severe Perthes’ disease with satisfactory results. The main limitation of our study is its short follow-up.     

Prognostic value of 18F-DOPA PET/CT at the time of recurrence in patients affected by neuroblastoma

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between ¹²³I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scan semi-quantification and a new ¹⁸F-DOPA positron emission tomography (PET)/CT score in patients with suspected or documented neuroblastoma (NB) relapse and to assess the association between these two parameters and progression-free survival (PFS)/overall survival (OS).

Methods

We analysed 24 NB patients who had undergone ¹²³I-MIBG and ¹⁸F-DOPA PET/CT scans at the time of suspected relapse, after applying a proper scoring system for each scan. In time-to-event analyses, the score distributions were regarded as continuous and were categorized in tertiles and medians. We used Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models for PFS and OS in order to estimate the independent prognostic impact of ¹²³I-MIBG and ¹⁸F-DOPA PET/CT scans.

Results

The ¹²³I-MIBG and ¹⁸F-DOPA scores were highly and positively correlated (Spearman’s rho?=?0.8, p?<?0.001). Over a median follow-up of 14 months (range 6–82), 12 cases of disease progression and 6 deaths occurred. Multivariate Cox models showed a higher risk of disease progression [hazard ratio (HR) 17.0, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.7–109] in NB patients with ¹²³I-MIBG score?>?3 (3rd tertile) and an even higher risk (HR:37.2, 95 % CI 2.4–574) in those with ¹⁸F-DOPA whole-body metabolic burden (WBMB) >7.5 (median), after adjustment for all main clinical/pathological factors considered. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed a significant association with OS (log-rank p?=?0.01 and p?=?0.03 for ¹²³I-MIBG and ¹⁸F-DOPA WBMB, respectively).

Conclusion

Our results confirm the good agreement between ¹⁸F-DOPA PET/CT and ¹²³I-MIBG scan in patients affected by NB relapse. In time-to-event analyses, ¹²³I-MIBG scan and ¹⁸F-DOPA PET/CT scores were independently and significantly associated with disease progression.     

Endovascular repair for concomitant multilevel aortic disease.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with multilevel aortic disease represent a small subgroup with the need for extensive surgical treatment at considerable risk. We present our experience of endovascular exclusion for simultaneous thoracic and abdominal aortic disease in four patients. METHODS: Between January 2002 and January 2005, four patients underwent endovascular repair for simultaneous thoracic and abdominal aortic disease. Mean age was 69+/-10 years (range, 60-81). Thoracic lesions included penetrating aortic ulcer (n=2, ruptured=1), atherosclerotic aneurysm (n=1), and chronic type B dissection (n=1). Abdominal aortic disease included atherosclerotic infrarenal (n=3) and juxtarenal (n=1) aortic aneurysms. Thoracic aortic stent-grafts had been the following: Excluder/TAG (n=3) or Talent (n=1) straight tube devices. Abdominal aortic stent-grafts used were as following: Excluder (n=3) or Zenith (n=1). All patients were followed-up with CT-angiography and chest X-rays 1, 4, 12 months after the procedure, and once per year thereafter. RESULTS: Stent-graft deployment was technically successful in all cases. Intraoperative mortality was not observed. Mean procedure time was 94+/-34 min (range, 70-145). Early postoperative complications occurred in one patient that developed acute renal failure but dialysis was not required. Mean hospitalisation was 8+/-5 days (range, 4-15). Late death occurred in one patient for an undetected ruptured thoracic type 1 endoleak. All three survivors are currently well 16.5 months (range, 3-36) after surgery. No neurological complications developed. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous abdominal and thoracic endovascular repair for multilevel aortic disease is feasible and could be a viable alternative in high-risk patients, who otherwise may not be suitable candidates for conventional repair.     

Repeated Surgical or Endoscopic Myotomy for Recurrent Dysphagia in Patients After Previous Myotomy for Achalasia

Aim

Surgical myotomy of the lower esophageal sphincter has a 5-year success rate of approximately 91 %. Peroral endoscopic myotomy can provide similar results for controlling dysphagia. Some patients experience either persistent or recurrent dysphagia after myotomy. We present here a retrospective analysis of our experience with redo myotomy for recurrent dysphagia in patients with achalasia.

Methods

From March 1996 to February 2015, 234 myotomies for primary or recurrent achalasia were performed in our center. Fifteen patients (6.4 %) had had a previous myotomy and were undergoing surgical redo myotomy (n?=?9) or endoscopic redo myotomy (n?=?6) for recurrent symptoms.

Results

Patients presented at a median of 10.4 months after previous myotomy. Median preoperative Eckardt score was 6. Among the nine patients undergoing surgical myotomy, three esophageal perforations occurred intraoperatively (all repaired immediately). Surgery lasted 111 and 62 min on average (median) in the surgical and peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) groups, respectively. No postoperative complications occurred in either group. Median postoperative stay was 3 and 2.5 days in the surgical and POEM groups, respectively. In the surgical group, Eckardt score was <3 for seven out of nine patients after a mean follow-up of 19 months; it was <3 for all six patients in the POEM group after a mean follow-up of 5 months.

Conclusions

A redo myotomy should be considered in patients who underwent myotomy for achalasia and presenting with recurrent dysphagia. Preliminary results using POEM indicate that the technique can be safely used in patients who have undergone previous surgical myotomy.

     

Effect of Balloon‐Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Positioning: A Patient‐Specific Numerical Model

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a life‐saving and effective alternative to surgical valve replacement in high‐risk, elderly patients with severe calcific aortic stenosis. Despite its early promise, certain limitations and adverse events, such as suboptimal placement and valve migration, have been reported. In the present study, it was aimed to evaluate the effect of various TAVR deployment locations on the procedural outcome by assessing the risk for valve migration. The deployment of a balloon‐expandable Edwards SAPIEN valve was simulated via finite element analysis in a patient‐specific calcified aortic root, which was reconstructed from CT scans of a retrospective case of valve migration. The deployment location was parametrized in three configurations and the anchorage was quantitatively assessed based on the contact between the stent and the native valve during the deployment and recoil phases. The proximal deployment led to lower contact area between the native leaflets and the stent which poses higher risk for valve migration. The distal and midway positions resulted in comparable outcomes, with the former providing a slightly better anchorage. The approach presented might be used as a predictive tool for procedural planning in order to prevent prosthesis migration and achieve better clinical outcomes.