Variation in optimal hemodynamic atrio-ventricular delay of biventricular pacing with different endocardial left ventricular lead locations using precision hemodynamics

Introduction

It is not known whether the optimal atrioventricular (AV_opt) delay varies between left ventricular (LV) pacing site during endocardial biventricular pacing (BiVP) and may therefore needs consideration.

Methods

We assessed the hemodynamic AV_opt in patients with chronic heart failure undergoing endocardial LV lead implantation. AV_opt was assessed during atrio-BiVP with a “roving LV lead.” Up to four locations were studied: mid-lateral wall, mid-septum (or a close alternative), site of greatest hemodynamic improvement, and LV lead implant site. The AV_opt was compared to a fixed AV delay of 180 ms.

Results

Seventeen patients were included (12 male, aged 66.5 ± 12.8 years, ejection fraction 26 ± 7%, 16 left bundle branch block or high percentage of right ventricular pacing [RVP], QRS duration 167 ± 27 ms). In most locations (62/63), AV_opt increased systolic blood pressure during BiVP compared with RVP (relative improvement 6 mmHg, interquartile range [IQR] 4–9 mmHg). Compared to a fixed AV delay, the hemodynamic improvement at AV_opt was higher (1 mmHg, IQR 0.2–2.6 mmHg, p < .001). Within most patients (16/17), we observed a difference in AV_opt between pacing sites (median paced AV_opt 209 ms, IQR 117–250). Within this range, the hemodynamic impact of these differences was small (median loss 0.6 mmHg, IQR 0.1–2.6 mmHg).

Conclusion

Within a patient, different endocardial LV lead locations have slightly different hemodynamic AV_opt which are superior to a fixed AV delay. The hemodynamic consequence of applying an optimum from a different lead location is small.