Is the bipolar vessel sealer device an effective tool in robotic surgery? A retrospective analysis of our experience and a meta-analysis of the literature about different robotic procedures by investigating operative data and post-operative course

Background: The latest robotic bipolar vessel sealing tools have been described to be effective allowing to perform procedures with reduced blood loss and shorter operative times. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and reliability of these devices applied in different robotic procedures.

Material and methods: All robotic operations, between 2014 and 2016, were performed using the EndoWrist One VesselSealer (EWO, Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA), a bipolar fully wristed device. Data, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), were collected. Robot docking time, intraoperative blood loss, robot malfunctioning and overall operative time were analyzed. A meta-analysis of the literature was carried out to point the attention to three different parameters (mean blood loss, operating time and hospital stay) trying to identify how different coagulation devices may affect them.

Results: In 73 robotic procedures, the mean operative time was 118.2?minutes (75–125?minutes). Mean hospital stay was four days (2–10 days). There were two post-operative complications (2.74%).

Conclusions: The bipolar vessel sealer offers the efficacy of bipolar diathermy and the advantages of a fully wristed instrument. It does not require any change of instruments for coagulation or involvement of the bedside assistant surgeon. These characteristics lead to a reduction in operative time.     

Cardiovascular impact of testosterone therapy for hypogonadism

Introduction: Since 2010 some evidence supporting the possible increased cardiovascular (CV) risk related to testosterone treatment (TTh) has created much debate in the scientific community. Based on these results, the US Food and Drug Administration agency has questioned TTh for aging men recognizing its value only for classical hypogonadism due to genetic or organic causes. To better clarify this topic, we scrutinized and summarized, also by using meta-analytic methods, the data generated during the last 7 years, as derived from the analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on TTh and CV risk.

Areas covered: Analysis included 31 RCTs published between 2010 and 2018. Retrieved trials included 2675 and 2308 patients in TTh and placebo groups, respectively. The analysis documented that TTh was not associated with an increased CV mortality or morbidity either when overall or major adverse CV events were considered.

Expert commentary: Despite present evidence it is important to recognize that the duration of the available trials is short (lower that 3 years) limiting final conclusions on this topic. In particular, the available information on possible long-term effects of TTh on CV risk is limited. Long-term safety studies are advisable to better clarify these points.     

Utility of risk scores to predict adverse events in cardiac lead extraction

Introduction: Increasing device implantations, patient comorbidities, and longer life expectancy contribute to an increased need for lead extraction. Even if transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is a highly successful procedure, some serious procedural complications are reported. In order to identify those patients who are at higher risk, risk stratification scores were proposed.

Areas covered: The major obstacles to lead extractions are represented by the body’s response to the foreign implanted material and by the following development of fibrotic reaction between the lead and the vascular system. Several clinical factors and device features are associated with major complications and worse outcomes. Although different multiparametric scores predicting the safety and the efficacy of TLE procedures were reported, none of these scores were prospective evaluated.

Expert commentary: A correct risk stratification is needed in order to refer complex patients to centers with proven experience and avoid futile procedures. Furthermore, the identification of high-risk patients allows to perform the extraction procedure in the operating room instead of electrophysiology lab. Albeit some risk scores able to predict adverse event in cardiac lead extraction were described, there are still several limitations to their use and reproducibility.     

Venous thromboembolism in patients with liver diseases

Essentials

• Emerging evidence shows that patients with liver disease are not protected from thrombotic events.
• We assessed the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with liver disease.
• The presence of VTE resulted in an increase in mortality for patients with liver disease.
• Hospitalized patients with moderate‐severe liver disease had low risk of VTE during admission.

Summary

Background and Aims

Patients with liver disease were traditionally believed to be protected against development of blood clots, but some studies have shown a potential increased risk of venous thrombotic complications. We assessed the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with liver disease.

Methods

Data in discharge reports of patients with liver disease and control patients without liver disease were analyzed from the national inpatient sample. Incidence of VTE was compared in patients with mild, moderate‐severe or no liver disease, and the impact on in‐hospital mortality and length of stay was calculated.

Results

The overall incidence of VTE for patients with no liver disease, mild liver disease and moderate‐severe liver disease was 2.7, 2.4 and 0.9 per 100 patient discharges, respectively. In the presence of VTE, in‐hospital mortality was 10.8%, 5.8%, and 21.7% for the no liver disease, mild disease and moderate‐severe liver disease, respectively. The presence of VTE resulted in an increase in mortality for patients with no liver disease (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.14–1.18) and moderate‐severe liver disease (OR, 1.63; CI 95%, 1.42–1.88).

Conclusions

Patients with moderate‐severe liver disease have a lower risk of VTE than those without liver disease. Development of thrombosis during admission increased the risk of in‐hospital mortality.

     

Intramyocardial dissecting hematoma in anterior wall ST elevation myocardial infarction: impact on left ventricular remodeling and prognosis

Intramyocardial dissecting hematoma is an uncommon complication of myocardial infarction potentially leading to cardiac rupture. The aim of the present study was to investigate coronary reperfusion results, left ventricular (LV) function recovery and remodeling and clinical outcomes in patients with anterior STEMI complicated by intramyocardial hematoma. We prospectively studied 87 patients (mean age 59?±?10 years; 88% male) with anterior STEMI (42 with intramyocardial hematoma) in order to evaluate coronary reperfusion results, LV remodeling (≥15% increase in end-systolic volume) and clinical outcomes (cardiac death, non-fatal reinfarction, and hospitalization for congestive heart failure) at 24 months. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow score and myocardial blush grade (MBG) were assessed both pre- and post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and speckle-tracking echocardiography was performed post PCI and at 6-month follow-up. Patients with hematoma had lower post-PCI TIMI score and MBG, higher heart rate, worse LV ejection fraction and longitudinal or rotational function than their counterparts. LV remodeling occurred in 33 (78.6%) patients with hematoma and 11 (24.4%) patients without (p?<?0.001). Independent predictors of LV remodeling were heart rate (p?=?0.018), MBG (p?=?0.036) and presence of hematoma (p?<?0.001). Hematoma (log-rank test, χ²?=?9.849; p?=?0.002) and LV remodeling (log-rank test, χ²?=?13.770; p?<?0.001) were associated to a higher rate of adverse events. Cox analysis identified LV remodeling as the only independent predictor of adverse events (hazard ratio?=?3.912; 95% confidence interval, 1.429–10.714; p?=?0.008). Intramyocardial dissecting hematoma complicating anterior STEMI is an independent determinant of LV remodeling and is associated to poor prognosis.     

The Impact of Local Immigration Enforcement Policies on the Health of Immigrant Hispanics/Latinos in the United States

Objectives. We sought to understand how local immigration enforcement policies affect the utilization of health services among immigrant Hispanics/Latinos in North Carolina.Methods. In 2012, we analyzed vital records data to determine whether local implementation of section 287(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act and the Secure Communities program, which authorizes local law enforcement agencies to enforce federal immigration laws, affected the prenatal care utilization of Hispanics/Latinas. We also conducted 6 focus groups and 17 interviews with Hispanic/Latino persons across North Carolina to explore the impact of immigration policies on their utilization of health services.Results. We found no significant differences in utilization of prenatal care before and after implementation of section 287(g), but we did find that, in individual-level analysis, Hispanic/Latina mothers sought prenatal care later and had inadequate care when compared with non-Hispanic/Latina mothers. Participants reported profound mistrust of health services, avoiding health services, and sacrificing their health and the health of their family members.Conclusions. Fear of immigration enforcement policies is generalized across counties. Interventions are needed to increase immigrant Hispanics/Latinos’ understanding of their rights and eligibility to utilize health services. Policy-level initiatives are also needed (e.g., driver’s licenses) to help undocumented persons access and utilize these services.Federal immigration enforcement policies have been increasingly delegated to state and local jurisdictions, leading to increased enforcement activities by local police. This shift has resulted largely from the implementation of 2 federal initiatives: section 287(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act and the Secure Communities program. Section 287(g) authorizes Immigration and Custom Enforcement to enter into agreements with state and local law enforcement agencies to enforce federal immigration law during their regular, daily law enforcement activities. The original intention was to “target and remove undocumented immigrants convicted of violent crimes, human smuggling, gang/organized crime activity, sexual-related offenses, narcotics smuggling and money laundering.”1 Added to the Immigration and Nationality Act in 1996, section 287(g) was not widely used in its first decade, but its use accelerated in the mid- to late 2000s.2,3The Secure Communities program differs from section 287(g) in that it does not authorize local enforcement bodies to arrest individuals for federal immigration violations. Instead, when individuals are arrested for nonimmigration matters, the Secure Communities program facilitates the sharing of local arrestees’ fingerprints and information with Immigration and Custom Enforcement and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which checks them against immigration databases. If these checks reveal that an individual is unlawfully present in the United States or otherwise removable because of a criminal conviction, Immigration and Custom Enforcement takes enforcement action.4Some evidence suggests that both section 287(g) and the Secure Communities program contribute to Hispanic/Latino immigrants’ general mistrust of local law enforcement and fear of utilizing a variety of public services, such as police protection and emergency services.2,5–7 Although many immigrant Hispanics/Latinos in the United States experience barriers to care because of a lack of bilingual and bicultural services, low health literacy, insufficient public transportation, and limited knowledge of available health services,8–12 studies have suggested that individuals lacking legal status may have more difficulty obtaining health services and may experience worse health outcomes than do individuals with legal status.13–18 Among immigrant Hispanics/Latinos, the fear of deportation, a lack of required forms of documentation, interaction with law enforcement personnel, and racial profiling are factors also associated with reduced utilization of health services and worse health.6,19–22 Such fears lead to incomplete sequences of care,19,20,23,24 promote the use of nonstandard and unsafe contingencies for care,16,25–27 and contribute to public health hazards, as immigrants delay preventive care or treatment.13,22,28 These fears further affect long-term health outcomes as immigrant Hispanics/Latinos alter their physical activity, food purchasing behaviors, and food consumption because of concerns about being in public.29 They may withhold information from health care providers19 and experience high levels of stress, leading to compromised mental health.20,30,31The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act bars undocumented or recent legal immigrants from receiving financial assistance for health insurance32; thus, many will continue to remain uninsured and dependent on public health services and free clinics for a significant portion of their care. Because these services are associated with government authority, there is the potential that increasing immigration enforcement policies will deter noncitizens from seeking needed care, not only to their detriment but also to the detriment of public health.Currently there is little research examining the impact of recent immigration enforcement policies on the access to and utilization of health care, and there has been a call to better understand the public health impact of current immigration policies and their enforcement.29 Through mixed methods, we explored the effect of local immigration enforcement policies on access to and utilization of health services among immigrant Hispanics/Latinos in North Carolina. We analyzed vital records data to determine whether there were differences in utilization of prenatal services by Hispanic/Latina mothers pre- and postimplementation of section 287(g), and we conducted focus groups and in-depth interviews with Hispanics/Latinos living in counties that had implemented section 287(g) and in “sanctuary” counties, counties in which leaders, including politicians and clergy, have spoken out against the program.