Progesterone stimulates progenitor cells in normal human breast and breast cancer cells

The epithelium of the human breast is made up of a branching ductal–lobular system, which is lined by a single layer of luminal cells surrounded by a contractile basal cell layer. The co-ordinated development of stem/progenitor cells into these luminal and basal cells is fundamentally important for breast morphogenesis. The ovarian steroid hormones, progesterone (P) and 17β-estradiol, are critical in driving this normal breast development, yet ovarian activity has also been shown to be a major driver of breast cancer risk. We previously demonstrated that P treatment increases proliferation and augments the number of progenitor-like cells, and that the progesterone receptor (PR) is also expressed in the bipotent progenitor-enriched subfraction. Here we demonstrate that PR is expressed in a subset of CD10+ basal cells and that P stimulates this CD10+ cell compartment, which is enriched for bipotent progenitor activity. In addition, we have shown that P stimulates progenitor cells in human breast cancer cell lines and expands the cancer stem cell population via increasing the stem-like CD44+ population. As changes in cell type composition are one of the hallmark features of breast cancer progression, the demonstration that progenitor cells are stimulated by P in both normal breast and in breast cancer cells has critical implications in discerning the mechanisms of how P increases breast cancer risk.     

Skin Sensitization in School Children in Northern and Southern Norway

It has been suggested that environmental exposures and living conditions can explain some of the worldwide variation in atopic disorders. Norway has large environmental contrasts within the country. We compared skin prick sensitization rates among school children living in the southern subarctic and in the northern artic part of Norway. Approximately one quarter of the children were sensitized, mostly against pollen and animal dander, while mite and mould sensitization seemed to be a minor problem. Sensitization rates and profiles were similar in the north and south despite differences in living conditions and environmental exposures.     

Recovery concept in a Norwegian setting to be examined by the assertive community treatment model and mixed methods

Recovery is a crucial concept in the mental health field. The research of recovery is split into the categories of personal, social and clinical recovery. The purpose of this study was to explore the fragmented concept of recovery in light of assertive community treatment (ACT) in Norway. The study has a mixed methods design with a pragmatic approach. The Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery and open‐ended questions posed to 70 participants from 12 ACT teams in Norway, gathered by the “Users interview users” method, are combined with interviews or focus groups with eight of these participants. Surprisingly those under a community treatment order (CTO) report the highest degree of personal recovery. The qualitative material shows that the service users interpreted the concept of recovery differently than researchers and professionals. The ACT service users highlighted three important elements: flexible treatment, medication and access to a car. They emphasized the necessity for basic needs to be met in order to experience a meaningful recovery process, and these basic needs may be of even greater importance to those under CTOs. Their experiences should imply a greater emphasis on securing basic needs such as secure housing, sounder finances and access to the normal benefits offered by society.