Osteoporosis in the at‐risk asthmatic

The effect of inhaled glucocorticosteroids (ICS) on bone metabolism and subsequent osteoporosis is controversial. Explanations for this controversy include various study designs, duration of use, outcome measures, and population demographics of research studies with intranasal or inhalational ICS. Patients with poorly controlled asthma are at greatest risk of osteoporosis because they are commonly treated with intermittent or continuous systemic corticosteroids (SCS) or high‐dose ICS. A 45‐year‐old Caucasian woman presents with moderate‐to‐severe asthma with frequent albuterol use and nighttime awakenings at least once weekly. She is on fluticasone/salmeterol 500/50 μg one inhalation twice daily and montelukast 10 mg/day. She requires prednisone 15 mg three times per day for 5 days up to three times a year. Is this patient at greater risk of osteopenia, characterized by a T‐score between ?1.0 and ?2.5, and subsequent osteoporosis and an increased risk of fractures? If she has osteopenia, should she be treated with a bisphosphonate? The risk of osteoporosis and fracture increases significantly with frequent administration of SCS, and patients on such medications should undergo preventative measures and treatment. This study discuses factors that contribute to an increased risk of osteoporosis/osteopenia in patients with asthma and suggests recommendations based on the current literature.     

Efficacy and safety of recombinant C1 inhibitor for the treatment of hereditary angioedema attacks: a North American open-label study

BackgroundThe efficacy of recombinant human C1 inhibitor (rhC1INH) for the treatment of patients with acute hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks has been demonstrated in 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.ObjectiveTo assess the safety and efficacy of rhC1INH for repeated treatment of acute attacks of HAE.MethodsIn this open-label extension study, patients with eligible HAE attacks were treated with an intravenous 50-U/kg dose of rhC1INH with an option for an additional dose of 50 U/kg based on clinical response. Time to beginning of relief was assessed by patients using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Safety evaluation was based on the clinical laboratory results and adverse events.ResultsSixty-two patients were treated for 168 attacks (range, 1-8 attacks per patient). A total of 90% of the attacks were treated with a single 50-U/kg dose of rhC1INH. Median times to beginning of symptom relief for the first 5 attacks were 37 to 67 minutes. More than 90% of attacks responded within 4 hours after treatment with rhC1INH. There was no requirement for increased dosing with successive treatments. Thirty-nine patients (63%) reported at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event, with most events rated mild to moderate. Seven severe treatment-emergent adverse events were reported, and all were considered to be unrelated to treatment with rhC1INH.ConclusionThe results of this open-label extension support continued efficacy of rhC1INH after repeated treatments for subsequent HAE attacks. There was no increase in adverse event reporting after repeated exposure to rhC1INH.Trial Registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00225147     

The changing face of reoperative parathyroidectomy: a single-centre comparison of 147 parathyroid reoperations

IntroductionReoperative parathyroidectomy for persistent and recurrent primary hyperparathyroidism is dependent on radiology. This study aimed to compare outcomes in reoperative parathyroidectomy at a single centre using a combination of traditional and newer imaging studies.Materials and methodsRetrospective case note review of all reoperative parathyroidectomies for persistent and recurrent primary hyperparathyroidism over five years (June 2014 to June 2019; group A). Imaging modalities used and their positive predictive value, complications and cure rates were compared with a published dataset spanning the preceding nine years (group B).ResultsFrom over 2000 parathyroidectomies, 147 were reoperations (101 in group A and 46 in group B). Age and sex ratios were similar (56 vs 62 years; 77% vs 72% female). Ultrasound use remains high and shows better positive predictive value (76% vs 57 %). 99mTc-sestamibi use has declined (79% vs 91%) but the positive predictive value has improved (74% vs 53%). 4DCT use has almost doubled (61% vs 37%) with better positive predictive value (88% vs 75%). 18F-fluorocholine positron emission tomography-computed tomography and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for parathyroid hormone are novel modalities only available for group A. Both carried a positive predictive value of 100%. Venous sampling with or without angiography use has decreased (35% vs 39%) but maintains a high positive predictive value (86% vs 91%). Cure rates were similar (96% vs 100%). Group A had 5% permanent hypoparathyroidism, 1% permanent vocal cord palsy and 1% haematoma requiring reoperation. No complications for group B.ConclusionOptimal imaging is key to good cure rates in reoperative parathyroidectomy. High-quality, non-interventional imaging techniques have produced a shift in the preoperative algorithm without compromising outcomes.