Clinical and laboratory factors contributing to uninterpretable beryllium lymphocyte proliferation tests (BeLPT)

Background

The beryllium lymphocyte proliferation test (BeLPT), has become the principal clinical test for detecting beryllium sensitization and chronic beryllium disease. Uninterpretable BeLPT results can occur in a small but significant proportion of tests from poor lymphocyte growth (PG) or over proliferation of lymphocytes (OP). The clinical and laboratory causes of uninterpretable results are not known.

Methods

BeLPT data from the US Department of Energy‐supported Former Worker Screening Program were analyzed for a 10‐year period. Drivers of uninterpretable BeLPTs were investigated using multivariable models and classification techniques.

Results

Three participant attributes were significantly associated with PG, while OP showed no significant associations. Serum lot for the lymphocyte growth medium accounted for 21% of the variation in PG and 16% in OP.

Conclusion

Serum lots influence the likelihood of having uninterpretable BeLPT. To better understand uninterpretable results and possibly reduce their occurrence, additional laboratory‐related factors should be addressed.

     

Commentary: IARC Monographs Program and public health under siege by corporate interests

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) evaluates causes of cancer with help from independent international experts in an open and transparent manner. Countries, research and regulatory agencies, and other organizations adopt IARC evaluations for communication of human cancer hazards, and for strategies to prevent cancer. Scientists worldwide endorse IARC cancer evaluations and process. Those with economic interests, however, challenge IARC's cancer evaluations, most recently for glyphosate and red and processed meats, and are conducting a campaign including intervention from US Congressional Representatives to discredit IARC's review process and to undermine financial support—a campaign intimidating to IARC and Working Group members. Challenges to scientific interpretations serve to advance science and should be resolved by scientific experts who do not have conflicts of interest. Such interference does not bode well for the free flow of scientific information that informs and protects the public from risks of cancer.     

Validated numerical modeling of the effects of combined orthodontic and orthognathic surgical treatment on TMJ loads and muscle forces.

Investigations of the changes in the mechanics of the craniomandibular system as a result of treatment have been limited by the lack of validated models of this system. The aims of this project were to (1) validate numerical model predictions of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) eminence morphology and muscle forces produced during molar biting and (2) use the validated models to calculate the changes in TMJ and muscle forces as a consequence of treatment involving orthognathic surgery. Ten volunteers participated; their combined orthodontic and orthognathic surgical treatments were completed. Three-dimensional anatomical data from each subject were used in computer models to predict the sagittal TMJ eminence morphology and joint and muscle forces for each subject, consistent with the neuromuscular objectives of minimizing joint loads and muscle effort. The actual shape of the eminence in each subject was measured with jaw tracking. Surface electromyographic recordings were a measure of the muscle forces involved in static molar biting. Model predictions were compared with measured data from the subjects for eminence shape (R(2) = 0.96) and for muscle activity ratios (R(2) = 0.98). The strength of these relationships validated the models for use in calculating changes in joint loads and muscle forces after treatment. The results suggested that the mechanics of the masticatory system are affected by the combined treatments. The TMJ loads increased in 8 subjects. The average increases in condylar and muscle forces were 4% relative to the applied bite force, but in 1 case the increases were up to 20%. Therefore, although average increases in the forces were small, some persons may experience biologically significant increases in joint and muscle forces as a result of treatment.     

Accuracy of three electronic apex locators in the presence of different irrigating solutions

The present study compared the accuracy of three electronic apex locators (EALs) - Elements Diagnostic?, Root ZX? and Apex DSP? - in the presence of different irrigating solutions (0.9% saline solution and 1% sodium hypochlorite). The electronic measurements were carried out by three examiners, using twenty extracted human permanent maxillary central incisors. A size 10 K file was introduced into the root canals until reaching the 0.0 mark, and was subsequently retracted to the 1.0 mark. The gold standard (GS) measurement was obtained by combining visual and radiographic methods, and was set 1 mm short of the apical foramen. Electronic length values closer to the GS (± 0.5 mm) were considered as accurate measures. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to verify inter-examiner agreement. The comparison among the EALs was performed using the McNemar and Kruskal-Wallis tests (p < 0.05). The ICCs were generally high, ranging from 0.8859 to 0.9657. Similar results were observed for the percentage of electronic measurements closer to the GS obtained with the Elements Diagnostic? and the Root ZX? EALs (p > 0.05), independent of the irrigating solutions used. The measurements taken with these two EALs were more accurate than those taken with Apex DSP?, regardless of the irrigating solution used (p < 0.05). It was concluded that Elements Diagnostic? and Root ZX? apex locators are able to locate the cementum-dentine junction more precisely than Apex DSP?. The presence of irrigating solutions does not interfere with the performance of the EALs.