Supplementing factual information with patient narratives in the cancer screening context: a qualitative study of acceptability and preferences

ObjectiveTo explore people''s responses to narrative information in the context of colorectal cancer screening.DesignNineteen in‐depth interviews were conducted with men and women (aged 45–59). Participants were given two types of colorectal screening information to read: factual and narrative. Participants gave their views on both types of information. Data were analysed using Framework Analysis.ResultsThe most frequent responses to the narrative information were that they were reassuring, made colorectal screening more vivid, participants could relate to the people in the stories and they liked the range of narratives presented. Despite the narrative information being seen as more persuasive by some, this was not regarded as manipulative or negative. Both types of information were seen as equally credible. Participants felt a combination of facts and narratives would be useful when considering an offer of colorectal cancer screening.ConclusionOverall, participants were positive about the addition of narrative information to the currently provided factual information about colorectal cancer screening. Supplementing existing factual information with narrative information may provide participants with a more complete understanding of participation in colorectal cancer screening when considering an offer to be screened.     

HIV-Related Stigma and Psychological Adjustment Among Perinatally HIV-Infected Youth in Cape Town,South Africa

AIDS and Behavior - The effect of chronic HIV-infection on psychological adjustment, including the impact of HIV-related stigma in perinatally HIV-infected (PHIV+) youth across Africa is largely...     

Dimensions of osteoarthritis self-management

Our aims were to determine whether a taxonomy of self-management strategies for osteoarthritis could be identified, and whether the resultant dimensions of such a taxonomy demonstrate predictable relationships with health status indices. Participants (n = 117) from community-based self-help groups and a general rheumatology outpatient clinic completed a self-management inventory consisting of 11 items, answered for both the past 7 days and a day on which symptoms were worse than usual. Duration of symptoms, level of pain, perceived functional ability and self-rated health were recorded as indicators of health status. Three essentially identical factors were obtained for both past 7 days and worse day items. Resultant scales were labeled passive, complementary and active, respectively. Correlations with health status measures provided modest evidence for the construct validity of these self-management scales. Compared with a simple aggregate score based on the total number of strategies used, the scales provided a clearer understanding of the relationship between self-management and health. The study provided a useful extension to existing research, addressing a number of shortcomings identified by previous researchers. The identified self-management dimensions offered a greater insight into the self-management choices of patients. Suggestions for further improvements to the measurement of self-management are outlined.Abbreviations OA Osteoarthritis     

Predominant or complete recipient T-cell chimerism following alemtuzumab-based allogeneic transplantation is reversed by donor lymphocytes and not associated with graft failure

The clinical significance of mixed chimerism following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains controversial. Its relevance and incidence are probably influenced by the conditioning regimen and incorporation of T‐cell depletion. The presence of recipient chimerism levels >40–50% following T‐cell replete reduced intensity transplantation correlates with a high risk of graft rejection, regardless of donor‐lymphocyte infusions, but it is unclear whether this finding translates to T‐cell depleted transplants. We conducted a retrospective single‐institution analysis of patients receiving alemtuzumab‐based HSCT. 27/152 (18%) evaluable cases had predominantly recipient T‐cell chimerism at 3 months or beyond. By contrast, coincident chimerism in the granulocyte lineage was predominantly of donor origin (median 100%) in all but one patient. Donor lymphocyte infusion effectively converted predominantly recipient T‐cell chimerism to ful donor chimerism in all evaluable cases including three cases with no detectable donor T cells. The only graft failure occurred in the patient with predominantly recipient myeloid chimerism in whom rejection occurred rapidly before donor lymphocytes could be administered. We conclude that predominant or complete recipient T‐cell chimerism following alemtuzumab‐based regimens does not have the same clinical implications as that following T‐cell replete transplants and can be effectively converted with donor lymphocytes without the need for lympho‐depleting agents or re‐conditioning.     

The effects of verbalisation on cognitive performance in schizophrenia: A pilot study using tasks from the Delis Kaplan Executive Function System

Cognitive impairment is common in schizophrenia, and has adverse effects on functional outcome. Cognitive remediation strategies in which people with schizophrenia speak aloud (verbalise) during task performance have demonstrated some success in improving performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. This study extends previous research by assessing whether verbalisation also improves performance on tasks selected from the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS).

Twenty two subjects with schizophrenia participated in the study. We used a within subjects design to compare performance on the D-KEFS Tower Test and Trail Making Test when participants (a) produced concurrent verbalisation, or (b) remained silent.

Results demonstrated selective benefits of verbalisation on a neuropsychological task requiring multiple executive functions (number-letter switching task), while performance on tasks requiring simpler single-component cognitive functions (visual scanning and motor speed tasks) was adversely affected.

The effects of verbalisation on the cognitive task performance of patients with schizophrenia differ depending on the nature of the task. Benefits are seen in tests of executive skills but performance worsens in single component cognitive tasks. When developing cognitive remediation strategies for people with schizophrenia, consideration should be given to the nature and cognitive demands of each task before recommending verbalisation strategies.