Interaction of ritonavir-boosted tipranavir with loperamide does not result in loperamide-associated neurologic side effects in healthy volunteers

Loperamide (LOP) is a peripherally acting opioid receptor agonist used for the management of chronic diarrhea through the reduction of gut motility. The lack of central opioid effects is partly due to the efflux activity of the multidrug resistance transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) at the blood-brain barrier. The protease inhibitors are substrates for P-gp and have the potential to cause increased LOP levels in the brain. Because protease inhibitors, including tipranavir (TPV), are often associated with diarrhea, they are commonly used in combination with LOP. The level of respiratory depression, the level of pupil constriction, the pharmacokinetics, and the safety of LOP alone compared with those of LOP-ritonavir (RTV), LOP-TPV, and LOP-TPV-RTV were evaluated in a randomized, open-label, parallel-group study with 24 healthy human immunodeficiency virus type 1-negative adults. Respiratory depression was assessed by determination of the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide. Tipranavir-containing regimens (LOP-TPV and LOP-TPV-RTV) caused decreases in the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity for LOP (51% and 63% decreases, respectively) and its metabolite (72% and 77% decreases, respectively), whereas RTV caused increases in the levels of exposure of LOP (121% increase) and its metabolite (44% increase). In vitro and in vivo data suggest that TPV is a substrate for and an inducer of P-gp activity. The respiratory response to LOP in combination with TPV and/or RTV was not different from that to LOP alone. There was no evidence that LOP had opioid effects in the central nervous system, as measured indirectly by CO2 response curves and pupillary response in the presence of TPV and/or RTV.     

Recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients

BACKGROUND: Because the natural history of atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) is not known in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) but without device-based atrial therapies, we aimed to describe the characteristics and recurrence of AT in such patients. METHODS: In this multicenter trial, 269 patients with standard indications for ICD placement and 2 episodes of AT in the preceding year received a dual-chamber ICD capable of logging AT. Patients were randomly assigned to 3-month periods of atrial therapies "on" or "off." This analysis considered only the 118 patients with atrial therapies programmed off at ICD placement. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (49%) had at least 1 AT episode longer than 1 minute, and 21 (18%) had at least 1 prolonged episode (>24 hours). The median episode frequency for each patient (episodes per month) was 1.8 episodes longer than 1 minute, 0.8 longer than 1 hour, and 0 longer than 24 hours. The median AT burden was 12.2 hours per month. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with standard ICD indications and history of AT have infrequent episodes, frequent short episodes, or prolonged episodes of AT-atrial fibrillation. However, the clinical characteristics examined did not distinguish among the groups. Improved diagnostic tools may help identify patients at risk for development of AT, thereby allowing specific therapies to be targeted to each group of patients.     

Factors affecting rheumatoid arthritis patients' decisions to participate in clinical trials

OBJECTIVE: To delineate the personal, psychosocial, and disease-related factors that may influence rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients' decisions to participate in clinical trials. METHODS: A total of 191 patients with RA were asked to participate in this survey. The questionnaire collected information on demographics, RA disease-related factors, and the importance of several factors that might influence patients' willingness to participate in clinical trials. Patients were then asked if they would consider participating in a hypothetical study. RESULTS: Participants were 88% female with a mean age of 40.5 years. The ethnic composition was 57% Hispanic, 25% Caucasian, 12% Asian, and 6% African American, with 71% having a family income < $20,000/year. Factors that patients considered important for participation in a clinical study included: the opportunity to help others, the possibility of improved health, early access to new therapy, the availability of free treatments, unknown side effects of the study drug, and the need to stop current therapy. There were strong correlations between the rank order importance weights between Hispanics and Caucasians, suggesting fundamental similarities in preferences. The most important factor was the opportunity to help others. In general, the more important factors were associated with preferences for trial participation. CONCLUSION: This questionnaire identified factors that may affect RA patients' willingness to participate in a study. Patient participation in trials is driven by diverse factors that include altruism and the opportunity for healthcare and improved health. Consideration of these factors may facilitate the inclusion of more diverse patient populations into trials and enhance the applicability of trial results.     

A pharmacological review of competitive inhibitors and substrates of high-affinity, sodium-dependent glutamate transport in the central nervous system

The acidic amino acid L-glutamate acts as both a primary excitatory neurotransmitter and a potential neurotoxin within the mammalian central nervous system. Functionally juxtaposed between these neurophysiological and pathological actions are an assorted group of integral membrane transporter proteins that rapidly and efficiently sequester glutamate into cellular and subcellular compartments. While multiple systems exist that are capable of mediating the uptake of L-glutamate, the high-affinity, sodium-dependent transporters have emerged as the most prominent players in the CNS with respect to terminating the excitatory signal, recycling the transmitter, and regulating extracellular levels of glutamate below those which could induce excitotoxic pathology. The focus of the present review is on the pharmacological specificity of these sodium-dependent transporters and, more specifically, on the competitive inhibitors that have been used to delineate the chemical requirements for binding and translocation. Analogues of glutamate that are conformationally constrained as a consequence of either the addition of substituents to the carbon backbone of glutamate or aspartate (e.g., beta-hydroxyaspartate or methylglutamate derivatives) or the incorporation of ring systems (e.g., (carboxycyclopropyl)glycines, aminocyclobutane dicarboxylates, or pyrrolidine dicarboxylates), have been especially valuable in these efforts. In this review, a particular emphasis is placed on the identification of analogues that exhibit preferential activity among the recently cloned transporter subtypes and on the differentiation of substrates from non-transportable inhibitors.     

An overview of immunomodulatory intervention in rheumatoid arthritis

In recent years there has been exceptional progress in the development of immunomodulatory interventions for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Part of the impetus for the creation of novel therapies for RA has come from a growing appreciation of the substantial morbidity and mortality that this chronic, progressive disease causes for affected patients. In addition, there has been the realization that currently available therapeutics are suboptimal as regards both their efficacy and tolerability. The development of newer therapies has been facilitated by two factors; a greater understanding of the immunopathogenesis of RA and progress in biotechnology that has allowed the creation of specific inhibitors and other agents. Myriad studies performed by investigators throughout the world have helped delineate the immunologic basis of RA. It appears that various components of the immune system are involved in the initiation and propagation of this systemic inflammatory disease. T-cells, and in particular activated CD4(+) 'memory' T-cells, serve a central role in orchestrating the immune response that underlies rheumatoid inflammation. Other cells, including monocytes, fibroblasts, B-cells, dendritic cells, mast cells and neutrophils also contribute significantly to various aspects of disease. Adhesion molecules mediate many intercellular interactions, thus contributing to activities such as the accrual of cells within the synovium and the activation of cells. Cytokines, small peptides that exert numerous inflammatory activities and cause many of the signs and symptoms of RA, play a crucial role. Indeed, RA may be considered a disorder of 'cytokine dysregulation' in that the activity of proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-alpha and IL-1 is enhanced, and overwhelms the effects of antiinflammatory factors. Finally, a host of other inflammatory mediators are involved in the disease process. Thus, many components of the immune response may be attractive therapeutic targets for immunomodulatory intervention in RA. Advances in biotechnology have permitted the creation of specific inhibitors of distinct components of the immune system. Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) have been created to target various cell surface molecules and cytokines. At first, most MAbs were murine in origin, which can present problems as regards immunogenicity. More recently, progress in molecular biologic techniques has allowed the synthesis of hybrid antibodies that are partly human. Such techniques have also allowed the creation of cytokine receptors coupled to immunoglobulin molecules, and other constructs. These agents can be modified to provide optimal characteristics in terms of half-life, immunogenicity and specificity, and this is an exciting area of new development. Progress has also been made in molecular-based agents that directly modify the genes or gene products for specific targets. To date, a number of trials assessing novel immunomodulatory therapies have been undertaken. In some cases, such as with inhibitors of TNF-alpha, the results have been dramatic and exciting. Further development and refinement may allow the introduction of these agents into the clinic in the foreseeable future, and will provide an important area for further research. In other cases, for example with therapies targeting CD4(+) molecules, the results have not been as promising as was hoped. Nevertheless, critical analysis of the results of these studies has provided insights into the pathogenesis of RA which may prove quite valuable for future trials. A number of agents are being studied actively at the present time, and it is hoped that they too may generate novel therapies for, and a greater understanding of, this difficult disease. The future for immunomodulatory intervention in RA looks very promising. Greater understanding of the intricacies of the immune response that underlie this disease should continue to yield viable, specific targets for novel therapies. Advances in biopharmaceuticals should generate treatments that maximize efficacy while minimizing toxicity. This should allow the clinician truly to modify the disease and achieve tangible improvements in the lives of RA patients.