Hermeneutic observational studies: describing a method

There is a need to develop and use research observations in the clinical field, primarily to gain insight into and assess evidence of what comprises caring in a real‐life situation and confirm what is actually taking place. In addition, assessments lead to a new and different understanding of what caring constitutes, thereby enabling the identification of what kind of care is being provided and is required. Such observations also enable the observer to perceive and verbalise caring. There are ongoing discussions, specifically in Nordic countries, on how to use caring science‐based observations as a means of collecting and interpreting qualitative data through the application of a hermeneutic approach, which constitutes describing what has been seen and reporting on it by way of ethical obligation. This article contributes to the debate through the provision of additional content and by reflecting on the development and usability of hermeneutical research observations from a method and methodological perspective, thereby refining previous ideas and extending previous assumptions. The primary study objective was to report on the experience of utilising observations as a single data collection method for hermeneutic research with the aim of evaluating the interplay between intensive care unit (ICU) patients and their next of kin. A secondary objective was to highlight the impact of preknowledge and preunderstanding on the interpretation process. An intensive care context was assessed as the most appropriate, as the majority of patients are unable to engage in verbal narratives during ongoing treatment and care. The benefits of employing hermeneutic observation as well as interpretation and preunderstanding from a caring science perspective are considered.     

Good clinical research practice (GCRP) in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents III: The 2023 Geneva revision

The set of guidelines for good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents was developed following an international consensus conference in Copenhagen in 1996 (Viby-Mogensen et al., Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1996, 40 , 59–74); the guidelines were later revised and updated following the second consensus conference in Stockholm in 2005 (Fuchs-Buder et al., Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007, 51 , 789–808). In view of new devices and further development of monitoring technologies that emerged since then, (e.g., electromyography, three-dimensional acceleromyography, kinemyography) as well as novel compounds (e.g., sugammadex) a review and update of these recommendations became necessary. The intent of these revised guidelines is to continue to help clinical researchers to conduct high-quality work and advance the field by enhancing the standards, consistency, and comparability of clinical studies. There is growing awareness of the importance of consensus-based reporting standards in clinical trials and observational studies. Such global initiatives are necessary in order to minimize heterogeneous and inadequate data reporting and to improve clarity and comparability between different studies and study cohorts. Variations in definitions of endpoints or outcome variables can introduce confusion and difficulties in interpretation of data, but more importantly, it may preclude building of an adequate body of evidence to achieve reliable conclusions and recommendations. Clinical research in neuromuscular pharmacology and physiology is no exception.     

Peri-operative electrically evoked auditory brainstem response assessment of facial nerve/cochlea interaction at cochlear implantation

Objectives: Dehiscence between the cochlear otic capsule and the facial nerve canal is a rare and relatively newly described pathology. In cochlear implantation (CI), this dehiscence may lead to adverse electric facial nerve stimulation (FNS) already at low levels, rendering its use impossible. Here, we describe an assessment technique to foresee this complication.

Methods: Pre- and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans and intraoperative electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (e-ABR) measurements were analyzed in two patients with cochlear-facial dehiscence (CFD).

Results: Because of the relatively low resolution, the confirmation of CFD with a clinical CT was difficult. The e-ABR displayed a large potential with 6 and 7.5?ms latency, respectively, which did not occur otherwise.

Discussion: Potential strategies to resolve and manage FNS are described.

Conclusion: Prediction of FNS by assessing the distance between the labyrinthine portion of the facial nerve and the cochlea is difficult using conventional CT scans. A large evoked late myogenic potential at low stimulation levels during intraoperative e-ABR measurement may foresee FNS at CI activation.     

Prevalence,age at onset,and risk factors of self‐reported asthma among Swedish adolescent elite cross‐country skiers

The objective of the study was to compare the prevalence of self‐reported physician‐diagnosed asthma and age at asthma onset between Swedish adolescent elite skiers and a reference group and to assess risk factors associated with asthma. Postal questionnaires were sent to 253 pupils at the Swedish National Elite Sport Schools for cross‐country skiing, biathlon, and ski‐orienteering (“skiers”) and a random sample of 500 adolescents aged 16‐20, matched for sport school municipalities (“reference”). The response rate was 96% among the skiers and 48% in the reference group. The proportion of participants with self‐reported physician‐diagnosed asthma was higher among skiers than in the reference group (27 vs 19%, P =.046). Female skiers reported a higher prevalence of physician‐diagnosed asthma compared to male skiers (34 vs 20%, P =.021). The median age at asthma onset was higher among skiers (12.0 vs 8.0 years; P <.001). Female sex, family history of asthma, nasal allergy, and being a skier were risk factors associated with self‐reported physician‐diagnosed asthma. Swedish adolescent elite cross‐country skiers have a higher asthma prevalence and later age at asthma onset compared to a reference population. Being an adolescent, elite skier is an independent risk factor associated with asthma.     

Meniscus repair with simultaneous ACL reconstruction demonstrated similar clinical outcomes as isolated ACL repair: a result not seen with meniscus resection

Purpose

To compare Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) subscale scores at 2-year follow-up for patients with primary isolated ACL reconstruction with patients undergoing ACL reconstruction and simultaneous meniscal treatment in terms of either resection or repair in the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register (SNKLR).

Methods

All ACL reconstruction patients within the SNKLR at 2-year follow-up were reviewed. The KOOS and EQ-5D subscales were assessed in four distinct patient groups: isolated ACL reconstruction, ACL reconstruction?+?medial meniscus resection, ACL reconstruction?+?lateral meniscus resection, ACL reconstruction?+?medial meniscus repair, and ACL reconstruction?+?lateral meniscus repair. The primary analysis was conducted using linear regression with isolated ACL reconstruction designated as the reference group, and was adjusted for patient age, gender, and time from injury to surgery.

Results

The included patients consisted of 10,001 (65.0%) individuals with an isolated ACL injury, 588 (3.8%) with ACL injury plus treated with medial meniscus repair, 2307 (15.0%) with ACL injury plus treated with medial meniscus resection, 323 (2.1%) with ACL injury plus treated with lateral meniscus repair, and 2173 (14.1%) with ACL injury plus treated with lateral meniscus resection. Meniscus resection demonstrated significantly worse results with respect to the KOOS Symptoms subscale for both the medial and lateral meniscus resection groups. Medial meniscus resection also demonstrated worse results for the KOOS quality of life (QoL) subscale, while lateral meniscus resection only approached significance. Outcomes were not different between the isolated ACL reconstruction group and the meniscus repair groups.

Conclusion

Meniscus resection in addition to ACL reconstruction resulted in worse clinical outcomes than isolated ACL reconstruction patients; a result not seen within the meniscus repair group. This suggests that, when possible, meniscus repair may provide greater clinical outcomes over resection when treating a reparable meniscal tear that presents along with an ACL tear. Clinicians should consider and implement these findings for the management of future meniscus tear patients within their clinical practice.

Level of evidence

Level III.