The glycemic index: similarity of values derived in insulin-dependent and non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients

To see whether relative differences in the glycemic responses to different foods were similar in insulin-dependent (IDDM) and non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients (NIDDM) we determined the glycemic index (GI) of a total of 20 foods and mixed test meals in groups of IDDM and NIDDM volunteers. The mean GI values ranged from 32 in NIDDM and 41 in IDDM (pearled barley) to 105 in NIDDM and 111 in IDDM (bread with cheese and tomato). The correlation between the mean GI values in IDDM and NIDDM was highly significant (r = 0.927, p less than 0.001). The mean GI values for 15 of the 20 test meals was greater in IDDM than in NIDDM (mean of GI for all 20 foods, 76 in IDDM compared with 68 in NIDDM, p less than 0.005). However, the difference in GI between IDDM and NIDDM was t statistically significant for 19 of the 20 individual test meals. Greater within-individual variability of glycemic responses in IDDM probably accounts for the slightly greater mean GI value seen in IDDM compared with NIDDM. The addition of 32 g cheddar cheese to four foods which were also fed without cheese had no significant effect on the GI in NIDDM (mean GI of 68 without cheese compared with 72 for the meals with cheese), but had a small effect in IDDM where the mean GI was increased from 72 to 87 (p less than 0.05). However, despite small increases in glycemic response to foods with added cheese, the relative differences between foods were unaffected by the addition of cheese in both IDDM and NIDDM. It is concluded that mean GI values for foods are very similar in IDDM and NIDDM patients.     

Similar postprandial glycemic reductions with escalation of dose and administration time of American ginseng in type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE: We previously demonstrated that 3 g American ginseng (AG) reduced postprandial glycemia (PPG) in type 2 diabetic individuals. We investigated whether further reductions can be achieved with escalation of dose and time of AG administration. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Ten type 2 diabetic patients (6 men, 4 women; age 63+/-2 years; BMI 27.7+/-1.5 kg/m2; HbA1c 7.3+/-0.3%) were randomly administered 0 g (placebo) or 3, 6, or 9 g ground AG root in capsules at 120, 80, 40, or 0 min before a 25-g oral glucose challenge. Capillary blood glucose was measured before ingestion of AG or placebo and at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min from the start of the glucose challenge. RESULTS: Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) demonstrated that treatment (0, 3, 6, and 9 g AG) but not time of administration (120, 80, 40, or 0 min before the challenge) significantly affected PPG (P<0.05), with significant (P = 0.037) interaction for area under the curve (AUC). Pairwise comparisons showed that compared with 0 g (placebo), 3, 6, or 9 g significantly (P<0.05) reduced AUC (19.7, 15.3, and 15.9%, respectively) and incremental glycemia at 30 min (16.3, 18.4, and 18.4%, respectively), 45 min (12.5, 14.3, and 14.3%, respectively), and 120 min (59.1, 40.9, and 45.5%, respectively). However, pairwise comparisons showed no differences between the 3-, 6-, or 9-g doses and any of the times of administration. CONCLUSIONS: AG reduced PPG irrespective of dose and time of administration. No more than 3 g AG was required at any time in relation to the challenge to achieve reductions. Because these reductions included glycemia at the 2-h diagnostic end point, there may be implications for diabetes diagnosis and treatment.     

Prediction of the relative blood glucose response of mixed meals using the white bread glycemic index

Unexpected plasma glucose responses to different mixed meals fed to normal and diabetic volunteers have recently been reported. We have therefore examined in normal volunteers the effect of mixing carbohydrate foods of different glycemic indices (GIs) without the addition of fat and protein. The observed GI of the mixed meal was within 2% of the expected value. In studies in the literature where fat and protein were added to mixed meals, the observed blood glucose responses also related significantly to the meal GIs calculated from the individual foods. Addition of fat and protein in the quantities used did not obscure this relationship. Studies to determine sources of error in comparing glycemic responses showed that type II diabetic patients displayed the least within-individual variation, and type I diabetic patients the most. Expression of results as the GI rather than as absolute glycemic response areas reduced by 50% the between-subject variation. The mean GI values of rice tested in type I and type II patients were similar (82 +/- 22 compared with 74 +/- 19) and the reproducibility 22 mo later in the same group of subjects was excellent (81 +/- 15 compared with 83 +/- 15). However, the lack of precise GI values for all foods fed in the test meals indicates a need for GI values to be derived for a wider range of individual foodstuffs. The GI approach to classifying foods according to physiologic effect may play a useful role in planning meals and diets in which specific blood glucose profiles are required.     

Ausbildung und Training des Rettungsfachpersonals und der Notärzte

Background

General threats, such as killing sprees and terror attacks, have moved into the focus of emergency medicine, with the consecutive adaptation of education and training.

Methods

Narrative review and expert assessment.

Result

Terrorist attacks are rare in Germany but should be taken into account due to their special safety requirements and rare patterns of injuries. There is a need for increased awareness among the emergency medical services regarding the threat and attention to the environment and the possibility of a threat situation. Communication channels and stand-by procedures at the scene must be clarified, triage must be regularly trained, and knowledge about the treatment of these patients and appropriate tactical strategies must be taught. The training of skills is essential and leads to a higher level of safety. As human factor resources, tools such as checklists can help with preparation. Mental support and debriefing concepts are needed to maintain the health and performance of the staff.

Discussion

It is important to train relevant competencies for rare events. A variety of topics should be taught during regular training, regardless of the threat situation.

     

Management of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis

OBJECTIVES: To educate scientists and health care providers about the effects of corticosteroids on bone, and advise clinicians of the appropriate treatments for patients receiving corticosteroids. METHODS: This review summarizes the pathophysiology of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis, describes the assessment methods used to evaluate this condition, examines the results of clinical trials of drugs, and explores a practical approach to the management of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis based on data collected from published articles. RESULTS: Despite our lack of understanding about the biological mechanisms leading to corticosteroid-induced bone loss, effective therapy has been developed. Bisphosphonate therapy is beneficial in both the prevention and treatment of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. The data for the bisphosphonates are more compelling than for any other agent. For patients who have been treated but continue to lose bone, hormone replacement therapy, calcitonin, fluoride, or anabolic hormones should be considered. Calcium should be used only as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment or prevention of corticosteroid-induced bone loss and should be administered in combination with other agents. Conclusions: Bisphosphonates have shown significant treatment benefit and are the agents of choice for both the treatment and prevention of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis.     

Peak bone mass from longitudinal data: Implications for the prevalence,pathophysiology, and diagnosis of osteoporosis

We estimated peak bone mass (PBM) in 615 women and 527 men aged 16 to 40 years using longitudinal data from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Individual rates of change were averaged to find the mean rate of change for each baseline age. The age range for PBM was defined as the period during which bone mineral density (BMD) was stable. PBM was estimated via hierarchical models, weighted according to 2006 Canadian Census data. Lumbar spine PBM (1.046 ± 0.123 g/cm²) occurred at ages 33 to 40 years in women and at 19 to 33 years in men (1.066 ± 0.129 g/cm²). Total hip PBM (0.981 ± 0.122 g/cm²) occurred at ages 16 to 19 years in women and 19 to 21 years in men (1.093 ± 0.169 g/cm²). Analysis of Canadian geographic variation revealed that the levels of PBM and of mean BMD in those over age 65 sometimes were discordant, suggesting that PBM and subsequent rates of bone loss may be subject to different genetic and/or environmental influences. Based on our longitudinally estimated PBM values, the estimated Canadian prevalences of osteoporosis (T‐score < –2.5) were 12.0% (L₁–L₄) and 9.1% (total hip) in women aged 50 years and older and 2.9% (L₁–L₄) and 0.9% (total hip) in men aged 50 years and older. These were higher than prevalences using cross‐sectional PBM data. In summary, we found that the age at which PBM is achieved varies by sex and skeletal site, and different reference values for PBM lead to different estimates of the prevalence of osteoporosis. Furthermore, lack of concordance of PBM and BMD over age 65 suggests different determinants of PBM and subsequent bone loss. © 2010 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research     

IOF position statement: vitamin D recommendations for older adults

This position paper of the International Osteoporosis Foundation makes recommendations for vitamin D nutrition in elderly men and women from an evidence-based perspective.     

Repeat Low‐Trauma Fractures Occur Frequently Among Men and Women Who Have Osteopenic BMD

Fracture risk assessment based solely on BMD has limitations. Additional risk factors include the presence of a previous low‐trauma fracture. We sought to quantify the fracture burden attributable to first versus repeat fracture. We studied 2179 men and 5269 women, 50–90 yr of age, participating in the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). We included all low‐trauma fractures that occurred over 8 yr of follow‐up and classified these as either first or repeat clinical low‐trauma fracture based on lifetime fracture history. Analyses were further stratified by sex, age, BMD risk categories (normal, osteopenia, osteoporosis), and vertebral deformity status. There were 128 fractures in men and 577 fractures in women. About 25% of fractures in men and 40% in women were repeat fractures. Just over one half of first fractures occurred in those with osteopenic BMD (58% in men, 54% in women). Just under one half of repeat fractures also occurred in those with osteopenic BMD (42% in men, 47% in women). The incidence of repeat fracture was, in most cases, nearly double, but sometimes nearly quadruple, the incidence of first fracture within a given BMD risk category in both men and women. Repeat fractures contribute substantially to overall fracture burden, and the contribution is independent of BMD. Furthermore, those with a combination of prior low‐trauma fracture and another risk factor were at especially high risk of future fracture.     

Vertebral Fracture Status and the World Health Organization Risk Factors for Predicting Osteoporotic Fracture Risk

Vertebral fractures are the most common osteoporotic fracture, and patients with prevalent vertebral fractures have a greater risk of future fractures. However, radiographically determined vertebral fractures are not identified as a distinct risk factor in the World Health Organization (WHO) fracture risk assessment tool. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare potential risk factors including morphometric spine fracture status and the WHO risk factors for predicting 5‐yr fracture risk. We hypothesized that spine fracture status provides prognostic information in addition to consideration of the WHO risk factors alone. A randomly selected, population‐based community cohort of 2761 noninstitutionalized men and women ≥50 yr of age living within 50 km of one of nine regional centers was enrolled in the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMOS), a prospective and longitudinal cohort study following subjects for 5 yr. Prevalent and incident spine fractures were identified from lateral spine radiographs. Incident nonvertebral fragility fractures were determined by an annual, mailed fracture questionnaire with validation, and nonvertebral fragility fracture was defined by investigators as a fracture with minimal trauma. A model considering the WHO risk factors plus spine fracture status provided greater prognostic information regarding future fracture risk than a model considering the WHO risk factors alone. In univariate analyses, age, BMD, and spine fracture status had the highest gradient of risk. A model considering these three risk factors captured almost all of the predictive information provided by a model considering spine fracture status plus the WHO risk factors and provided greater predictive information than a model considering the WHO risk factors alone. The use of spine fracture status along with age and BMD predicted future fracture risk with greater simplicity and higher prognostic accuracy than consideration of the risk factors included in the WHO tool.