We previously determined that several diets used to rear
Aedes aegypti and other mosquito species support the development of larvae with a gut microbiota but do not support the development of axenic larvae. In contrast, axenic larvae have been shown to develop when fed other diets. To understand the mechanisms underlying this dichotomy, we developed a defined diet that could be manipulated in concert with microbiota composition and environmental conditions. Initial studies showed that axenic larvae could not grow under standard rearing conditions (27 °C, 16-h light: 8-h dark photoperiod) when fed a defined diet but could develop when maintained in darkness. Downstream assays identified riboflavin decay to lumichrome as the key factor that prevented axenic larvae from growing under standard conditions, while gut community members like
Escherichia coli rescued development by being able to synthesize riboflavin. Earlier results showed that conventional and gnotobiotic but not axenic larvae exhibit midgut hypoxia under standard rearing conditions, which correlated with activation of several pathways with essential growth functions. In this study, axenic larvae in darkness also exhibited midgut hypoxia and activation of growth signaling but rapidly shifted to midgut normoxia and arrested growth in light, which indicated that gut hypoxia was not due to aerobic respiration by the gut microbiota but did depend on riboflavin that only resident microbes could provide under standard conditions. Overall, our results identify riboflavin provisioning as an essential function for the gut microbiota under most conditions
A. aegypti larvae experience in the laboratory and field.Diet crucially affects the health of all animals (
1). Most animals have a gut microbiota that can also affect host health both positively and negatively (
2–
6). However, understanding of the mechanisms underlying the effects of the gut microbiota remains a major challenge. This is because animals often consume complex or variable diets, and harbor large, multimember microbial communities that can result in many interactions that hinder identification of the factors responsible for particular host responses (
2,
6–
11). Metaanalyses and multiomic approaches can provide inferential insights on how diet–microbe or microbe–microbe interactions affect hosts (
11–
18), but functional support can be difficult to generate if proposed mechanisms cannot be studied experimentally (
2,
14). Thus, study systems where hosts can be reared on defined diets with or without a microbiota of known composition can significantly advance mechanistic insights by providing the means to control and manipulate dietary, microbial, and environmental variables that potentially affect a given host response (
19–
21).Mosquitoes are best known as insects that blood feed on humans and other vertebrates. Only adult-stage female mosquitoes blood feed, which is required for egg formation by most species (
22). Blood feeding has also led to several mosquitoes evolving into vectors that can transmit disease-causing microbes between hosts (
22). In contrast, the juvenile stages of all mosquitoes are aquatic, with most species feeding on detritivorous diets (
22–
24). Larvae hatch from eggs with no gut microbiota but quickly acquire relatively low-diversity communities from the environment by feeding (
25). Most gut community members are aerobic or facultatively anaerobic bacteria in four phyla (Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria), although other microbes, such as fungi and apicomplexans, have also been identified (
25–
39). Gut community composition also commonly varies within and between species as a function of where larvae develop, diet, and other variables (
28–
30,
32,
34,
40–
42).
Aedes aegypti has a worldwide distribution in tropical and subtropical regions, and is the primary vector of the agents that cause yellow fever, dengue fever, and lymphatic filariasis in humans (
43). Preferentially living in urban habitats, females lay eggs in water-holding containers with microbial communities, and larvae molt through four instars before pupating and emerging as adults (
30,
35,
41,
43). Conventionally reared cultures with a gut microbiota are usually maintained in the laboratory under conditions that mimic natural habitats with rearing temperatures of 25 to 28 °C and a 12- to 16-h light: 8- to 12-h dark photoperiod (
44–
46). Most insects that require microbial partners for survival live on nutrient-poor diets where microbes provision nutrients that cannot be synthesized or produced in sufficient abundance by the host (
3). Mosquito larvae can experience resource limitations in the field (
23–
25), but in the laboratory are reared on undefined, nutrient-rich diets, such as rodent chow, fish food flakes, or mixtures of materials like liver powder, fish meal, and yeast extract (
44–
46). Nonetheless, our previous studies indicated that axenic
A. aegypti as well as other species consume but fail to grow beyond the first instar when fed several diets that support the development of nonsterile, conventionally reared larvae (
30,
47–
49).
Escherichia coli and several other bacteria identified as gut community members could colonize the gut (producing monoxenic, gnotobiotic larvae) and rescue development, but feeding axenic larvae dead bacteria could not (
30,
35,
47). The presence of a gut microbiota in conventional and gnotobiotic but not axenic larvae was also associated with midgut hypoxia and activation of several signaling pathways with growth functions (
50,
51). Finally, our own previous results using a strain of
E. coli susceptible to ampicillin (
50), and more recently a method for clearing an auxotrophic strain of
E. coli from gnotobiotic larvae (
52), both showed that the proportion of individuals that develop into adults correlates with the duration that larvae have living bacteria in their gut.Altogether, the preceding results suggested that
A. aegypti and several other mosquitoes require a gut microbiota for development. In contrast, another recent study showed that axenic
A. aegypti larvae develop into adults, albeit more slowly than larvae with a gut microbiota, when fed diets comprised of autoclaved bovine liver powder (LP) and brewer’s yeast (
Saccharomyces cerevisiae) extract (YE) or autoclaved LP, YE, and
E. coli (EC) embedded in agar (
53). This latter finding suggests the undefined dietary components used provide factors larvae require for development into adults, whereas a gut microbiota was also required to provide these factors under the conditions in which our own previous studies were conducted. The goal of this study was to identify what these factors are. Toward this end, we first assessed the growth of axenic
A. aegypti when fed diets containing autoclaved LP, YE, and EC under different conditions. We then used this information to develop a defined diet that allowed us to systematically manipulate nutrient, microbial, and environmental variables. We report that the instability of riboflavin is a key factor underlying why
A. aegypti larvae require a gut microbiota under most conditions experienced in the laboratory and field.
相似文献