A novel keratanase-generated keratan sulfate antibody and its application to structural analysis of skeletal and corneal keratan sulfate

Introduction The objective of this study was to make monoclonal antibodies specific for keratanase‐generated neoepitopes in keratan sulfate (KS) and to use them along with existing KS monoclonal antibodies (e.g. 5D4, IB4) to investigate KS sulfation pattern motifs in connective tissue proteoglycans during development, ageing and disease. Methods Bovine nasal cartilage aggrecan (BNC A1D1) was trypsin digested, generating a range of GAG‐peptide fragments. The sample was then subjected to anion‐exchange and size exclusion chromatography to separate KS peptides from CS attachment domain fragments. Fractions were analysed by Western blotting for positive immunoreactivity for KS, then pooled and keratanase digested to generate ‘KS stub’ antigens. Immunization and fusions were carried out as previously described ( Caterson et al. 1983 ; Hughes et al. 1992 ). Screenings involved the use of a range of antigens; including keratanase vs. keratanase II‐digested bovine cartilage aggrecan and bovine corneal KS‐PGs. A new monoclonal antibody, BKS‐I, was identified that specifically recognized a keratanase‐generated neoepitope on both skeletal and corneal KS. This novel monoclonal antibody was used along with existing KS monoclonal antibodies 5D4 and 1B4 to investigate KS structure. Results and discussion Bovine trypsin‐generated aggrecan KS‐peptides were chondroitinase ABC treated and either keratanase or keratanase II treated. The digests were run on SDS‐PAGE and immunolocated with monoclonal antibody 5D4 (that recognizes linear disulfated N‐acetyl lactosamine disaccharide‐containing segments in KS) and the new ‘KS‐stub’ monoclonal antibody BKS‐I. Our results indicated that there was reduced monoclonal antibody 5D4 immunostaining after keratanase pretreatment. However, keratanase II digestion completely removed all 5D4 structural epitopes. In contrast, BKS‐I showed no immunostaining on the untreated KS‐peptides but strong staining on keratanase treated samples and no staining after keratanase II digestion. Similar patterns of immunoreactivity were observed with Western blot analysis of untreated, keratanase treated and keratanase II treated corneal KS‐PGs. Conclusion These data indicate that monoclonal antibody BKS‐I recognizes a nonreducing terminal neoepitope‐containing sulfated N‐acetylglucosamine adjacent to a nonsulfated lactosamine disaccharide. We also conclude that skeletal KS must have a structure with four possible variations opposed to the generic structures, proposed as being made of disulfated disaccharides at the nonreducing end, followed by a series of monosulfated disaccharides at the middle and nonsulfated disaccharides nearer the linkage region. 5D4 staining, observed after keratanase digestion, indicates that there must be a minimum structure of a pentasulfated hexasaccharide remaining on the KS chain ‘stubs’ near the linkage region of skeletal and corneal KS. The BKS‐I monoclonal antibody can be used to demonstrate differential substitution of KS GAG chains in the CS attachment region of cartilage aggrecan with ageing. It has also proven useful for immunohistochemical analyses identifying the sites of KS–PG association with collagen lamellae of cornea.     

Teaching ethics to paediatrics residents: the centrality of the therapeutic alliance

Context Previous research on ethical issues encountered by medical professionals in training and practice have presented the thematic content of the cases they encounter rather than the activities in which clinicians engage and in which they most often encounter ethical issues. We conducted a direct observation study of paediatrics residents and their preceptors seeing patients in an out‐patient general paediatrics clinic. Our objectives were to describe the everyday ethics‐related issues paediatrics residents encounter as they interact with patients. Our ultimate goal is to use this knowledge to enhance current efforts to teach ethics to paediatrics residents. Methods The study team directly observed paediatrics residents discussing patients with their faculty preceptors (19 half‐day sessions, 76 hours) in an out‐patient general paediatrics clinic located in an urban academic medical centre. Each interaction between resident and preceptor about a single patient was considered a case for further analysis. Results A total of 247 cases were recorded. Forty‐one of the cases were coded as having ethics‐related content. A constant comparative method of qualitative data analysis revealed that residents were most likely to encounter ethical issues when engaged in the following activities: (i) maintaining a therapeutic alliance with the caregiver (e.g. the parent); (ii) prioritising patient or family needs; (iii) adjusting to the power embodied by the role of doctors, and (iv) distinguishing suboptimal care from abuse or neglect. In addition, our findings indicate that it is through their efforts to maintain the therapeutic alliance with the caregivers of their patients that residents engage in and integrate three processes: developing their medical knowledge; adhering to professional norms, and balancing the power inherent in the doctor’s role with their responsibility to serve the patient’s interests. Conclusions Medical faculty tasked with teaching ethics to paediatrics residents can utilise the results of this project to better target and enhance their ethics education efforts directed at residents in the out‐patient setting. Future research could further examine and test these findings in other clinical settings (e.g. adult general medicine).     

Modafinil augmentation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor therapy in MDD partial responders with persistent fatigue and sleepiness.

BACKGROUND: Partial response, no response, or residual symptoms following antidepressant therapy is common in clinical psychiatry. This study evaluated modafinil in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who were partial responders to adequate selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy and excessive sleepiness and fatigue. METHODS: This retrospective analysis pooled the data of patients (18-65 yrs) who participated in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of modafinil (6-week, flexible-dose study of 100-400 mg/day or 8-week, fixed-dose study of 200 mg/day) plus SSRI therapy. Patients (n=348) met criteria for several residual symptoms (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS] score>or=10; 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale [HAM-D] score between 4 and 25; and Fatigue Severity Scale [FSS] score>or=4). RESULTS: Compared to placebo, modafinil augmentation rapidly (within 1 week) and significantly improved overall clinical condition (Clinical Global Impression-Improvement), wakefulness (ESS), depressive symptoms (17-item HAM-D), and fatigue (FSS) (p<.01 for all). At final visit, patients receiving modafinil augmentation experienced statistically significant improvements in overall clinical condition, wakefulness, and depressive symptoms. Modafinil was well tolerated in combination with SSRI. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this pooled analysis provide further evidence suggesting that modafinil is an effective and well-tolerated augmentation therapy for partial responders to SSRI therapy, particularly when patients continue to experience fatigue and excessive sleepiness.