Chronic myeloid leukaemia

Chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) was the first neoplastic disease for which knowledge of the genotype led to a rationally designed therapy. As a result of its well known pathophysiology, straightforward diagnosis, well established prognostic factors, and treatment for the cause of disease, CML has been studied to an extent that far exceeds that expected from its frequency, and serves as a model disease for other cancers. Imatinib, an inhibitor of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase, has revolutionised treatment of this disease, and is now recommended as standard treatment for chronic-phase CML. Interferon alfa is an acceptable alternative treatment in the early chronic phase for patients who do not tolerate imatinib. If imatinib treatment fails, allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, a dose increase of imatinib, or new drugs are recommended. Up to 87% of patients achieve complete cytogenetic remission, therefore we provide guidance for monitoring disease status. Many trials of new drugs and combination therapies that include imatinib are underway.     

Safety and efficacy of imatinib in chronic eosinophilic leukaemia and hypereosinophilic syndrome: a phase-II study

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of imatinib in chronic eosinophilic leukaemia (CEL, n = 23) and hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES, n = 13). In CEL with FIP1L1-PDGFRA (n = 16) or various PDGFRB fusion genes (n = 5), complete haematological remission (CHR) was achieved in 95% (20/21) after 3 months. Complete molecular remission (CMR) was seen in 75% (12/16) of cases with FIP1L1-PDGFRA positive CEL by 6 months, and in 87% (13/15) after 12 months. CMR was achieved in three of five PDGFRB fusion positive patients after 3, 9 and 18 months respectively. All patients are currently on imatinib (100 mg; n = 13, 400 mg; n = 8) and no molecular relapse has yet been observed (median 26.7 months; range, 6.9-39.9). Imatinib was less effective in HES and CEL without known molecular aberration (n = 15); CHR was observed in 40% (6/15) of patients, two patients relapsed after 4.8 and 24.5 months. Three patients died due to imatinib-resistant progressive CEL (n = 2) or myocardial infarction (n = 1) unrelated to study treatment. Overall, imatinib was well tolerated with a low incidence of grade III/IV toxicities. These data confirmed the long-term efficacy of imatinib for PDGFR-rearranged CEL patients, and also showed that a minority of HES cases without known molecular aberrations may benefit from imatinib.     

Chronic myelogenous leukemia: molecular and cellular aspects

Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) originates in a pluripotent hematopoetic stem cell of the bone marrow and is characterized by greatly increased numbers of granulocytes in the blood. Myeloid and other hematopoetic cell lineages are involved in the process of clonal proliferation and differentiation. After a period of 4–6 years the disease progresses to acute-stage leukemia. On the cellular level, CML is associated with a specific chromosome abnormality, the t(9; 22) reciprocal translocation that forms the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome. The Ph chromosome is the result of a molecular rearrangement between the c-ABL proto-oncogene on chromosome 9 and the BCR (breakpoint cluster region) gene on chromosome 22. Most of ABL is linked with a truncated BCR. The BCR/ABL fusion gene codes for an 8-kb mRNA and a novel 210-kDa protein which has higher and aberrant tyrosine kinase activity than the normal c-ABL-coded counterpart. Phosphorylation of a number of substrates such as GAP, GRB-2, SHC, FES, CRKL, and paxillin is considered a decisive step in transformation. An etiological connection between BCR/ABL and leukemia is indicated by the observation that transgenic mice bearing a BCR/ABL DNA construct develop leukemia of B, T, and myeloid cell origin. CML cells proliferate and expand in an almost unlimited manner. Adhesion defects in bone marrow stromal cells have been proposed to explain the increased number of leukemic cells in the peripheral blood. However, findings of our laboratory have shown that the BCR/ABL chimeric protein that is expressed in transfected cells may, under certain conditions, also increase the adhesion to fibronectin via enhanced expression of integrin. Our previous immunocytological studies on the expression of β1 and β2 integrins have found no qualitative differences between normal and CML hematopoietic cells in vitro. Even long-term-cultured CML bone marrow or blood cells continuously express those adhesion molecules that are characteristic of the cytological type. Recent experiments indicate that certain early CML progenitors may adhere to the stromal layer in vitro similarly to their normal counterparts. They cannot be completely removed by long-term culture on allogeneic stromal cells. At present, the only curative therapy is transplantation of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells. Based on the molecular and cellular state of knowledge of CML, new therapies are being developed. BCR/ABL antisense oligonucleotides, inhibitors of tyrosine kinase, peptide-specific adoptive immunotherapy or peptide vaccination, and restoration of hematopoiesis by autologous stem cell transplantation following CML cell purging are examples of important approaches to improving CML treatment. Received: 22 June 1998 / Accepted: 28 August 1998     

Molecular response of CML patients treated with interferon-α monitored by quantitative Southern blot analysis

We analysed 459 samples from 206 chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients at diagnosis and during or after treatment with interferon-α (IFN-α) by quantitative Southern blot analysis for BCR rearrangement. In a minority (2%) of Ph-positive patients, no BCR rearrangement was detectable due to breakpoints outside the major breakpoint cluster region (M-bcr) or possibly due to M-bcr deletions. Results from 235 samples were compared with the proportion of Ph-positive metaphases found in contemporaneous bone marrow specimens analysed by conventional cytogenetics. The rank correlation between both methods was 0.82 ( P <0.001). The proportion of CML cells in samples determined by Southern blot analysis (BCR ratio) was significantly different between cytogenetically-defined minor, partial, and complete response groups ( P <0.001). Empirically-derived cut-off points in the BCR ratio were introduced in order to define molecular response groups for comparison to standard cytogenetic response groups: a BCR ratio of 0% was defined as complete molecular response and ratios of 1–24%, 25–50%, and >50% were defined as partial, minor, and no molecular response, respectively. Using these cut-off points the concordance between both methods was 67% ( P <0.0001), a major cytogenetic response could be predicted or excluded in more than 90% of cases ( P <0.0001). Our findings demonstrated that quantitative Southern blot was as sensitive as cytogenetics and as peripheral blood samples are suitable for this technique it should be considered as the method of choice for routine monitoring IFN-α therapy in CML patients.