改良性治疗法联合西地那非治疗勃起功能障碍维吾尔族患者2505例回顾性分析

目的:性治疗法目前尚未普及,本研究旨在评价性治疗法联合西地那非治疗勃起功能障碍(ED)的疗效。方法:根据治疗方法的不同将在本院治疗随访过的3130例维吾尔族ED患者分成2组。对照组625例,单纯口服西地那非3个月;试验组2505例,采用性治疗法联合西地那非治疗3个月。采用国际勃起功能问卷表(IIEF-5)在各组治疗前、后进行疗效评估,并随访12个月。结果:对照组治疗前、后及在6个月、12个月随访的IIEF-5评分分别为12.80±3.76、18.10±2.61、17.35±2.73和16.64±2.63;试验组治疗前、后及在6个月、12个月随访的IIEF-5评分分别为12.73±3.52、19.06±4.07、19.86±2.42和20.47±2.38。两组治疗前后IIEF-5评分自身对比差异均有显著性(P<0.05)。组间比较,试验组较对照组6个月和12个月随访IIEF-5评分均有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:性治疗法联合西地那非治疗ED的效果优于单纯西地那非治疗,并在12个月的随访中稳定性良好。     

再发骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折保守治疗患者出院后生存质量

目的：对比初次和再发骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures,OVCFs)患者保 守治疗的生存质量,了解再次骨折对此类患者生存质量各方面的影响。方法：回顾性观察治疗OVCFs后出现再骨折 的患者30名(再骨折组)和同时期行保守治疗OVCFs后未发生再骨折的基本条件相似的患者30例(对照组),比较两组出 院后3个月时SF-36简明健康健康状况调查表的调查结果。结果：再骨折组治疗后的8个维度均不同程度较对照组变差 (均P<0.01)。结论：再骨折组患者的生存质量明显低于对照组,并且会进一步影响患者的心理预期、情绪和社会活动 的各个方面。     

Who will make health care decisions for me when I can't?

Medical professionals are increasingly faced with ethical dilemmas of caring for older patients who are decisionally incapacitated. Most often they rely on family to serve as surrogate decision makers. Does that practice agree with the preferences of the elderly themselves? Examined are the exploratory and qualitative findings of a sample of men and women, age 65 to 91 (N = 71). Comparisons are made between those elderly who have families and those who do not have families regarding the use of and interest in advance directives and proxy appointments. The findings suggest that elderly persons with families prefer to rely on relatives to conduct substitute decision making informally, unencumbered by legally executed living wills or proxy documents. Those without families view friends and doctors as their surrogate resource and endorse the use of legal proxy appointments. Implications for the use of advance directives and further public policy are discussed.