Quantitation of activated factor VII levels in plasma using a tissue factor mutant selectively deficient in promoting factor VII activation

Although the majority of factor VII (FVII) circulates in the zymogen form, low levels of activated factor VII (FVIIa) have been postulated to exist in plasma and to serve a priming function for triggering of the clotting cascade. However, direct measurement of plasma FVIIa has not previously been possible. We have quantified plasma FVIIa levels using a novel, highly sensitive assay that is free from interference by FVII. Specificity of this clot-based assay results from the use of a mutant tissue factor that is selectively deficient in promoting FVII activation, but retains FVIIa cofactor function. In normal adults, FVIIa was found to be present in plasma (mean: 3.6 ng/mL) with considerable variation between individuals (range: 0.5 to 8.4 ng/mL). FVIIa levels were only loosely correlated with FVII coagulant activity, but were elevated in pregnancy and reduced with oral anticoagulant therapy. Incubation of plasma on ice in glass containers (cold activation) resulted in substantial FVIIa generation. Measurement of plasma forms of factor VII is of potential clinical importance because elevated FVII coagulant activity has been implicated as a significant risk predictor for ischemic heart disease. Clinically, this new assay will now permit direct assessment of the role of plasma FVIIa in thrombotic disorders.     

Treatment of reducible unstable fractures of the distal radius in adults: a randomised controlled trial of De Palma percutaneous pinning versus bridging external fixation

Background  

At present, there is no conclusive evidence regarding the best treatment method for reducible unstable fractures of the distal radius. This study compared the effectiveness of two methods used in surgical treatment of such fractures: percutaneous pinning and external fixation.     

Bivalirudin utilization in cardiac surgery: shifting anticoagulation from indirect to direct thrombin inhibition

Purpose

Bivalirudin use for anticoagulating patients undergoing cardiac surgery, particularly those with or at risk for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, has expanded over the past several years. The purpose of this review is to provide a summary of the following: the differences between indirect and direct thrombin inhibition, unfractionated heparin’s limitations (i.e., heparin-induced thrombocytopenia), bivalirudin’s pharmacology, recent cardiac surgery trials comparing bivalirudin and unfractionated heparin as anticoagulants, the growing role of bivalirudin-mediated anticoagulation for various surgical procedures, and the potential of bivalirudin-mediated vascular graft patency.

Source

A systematic search of the English literature was performed using PubMed from the United States National Library of Medicine. Pertinent articles from 1992-2010 were obtained from this search, and their reference lists were used to retrieve additional relevant articles.

Principal findings

In small studies in the cardiac surgery arena, bivalirudin has demonstrated a similar safety and efficacy profile compared with unfractionated heparin. Bivalirudin’s role as an anticoagulant in various cardiac surgical procedures (i.e., heart transplant) and vascular surgical procedures is growing and reviewed. Additionally, the molecular basis for the potential for bivalirudin-mediated improvement in vascular graft patency after coronary artery bypass graft procedures is discussed.

Conclusion

Although bivalirudin is not approved for cardiac surgery in the United States, it can be used in this setting in Canada as an anticoagulant in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia provided the cardiac anesthesiologist is knowledgeable about potential complications from its use and knows how to manage or mitigate their incidence appropriately. During cardiopulmonary bypass, bivalirudin anticoagulation protocols must be thoroughly followed to attain optimal clinical outcomes. Additionally, further studies with bivalirudin are needed to determine the best monitoring modality and dosing regimen.     

UVB phototherapy in an outpatient setting or at home: a pragmatic randomised single-blind trial designed to settle the discussion. The PLUTO study

Background  

Home ultraviolet B (UVB) treatment is a much-debated treatment, especially with regard to effectiveness, safety and side effects. However, it is increasingly being prescribed, especially in the Netherlands. Despite ongoing discussions, no randomised research has been performed, and only two studies actually compare two groups of patients. Thus, firm evidence to support or discourage the use of home UVB phototherapy has not yet been obtained. This is the goal of the present study, the PLUTO study (Dutch acronym for "national trial on home UVB phototherapy for psoriasis").