Augmentation index predicts mortality in patients with aortic stenosis: an echo-tracking study

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging - Aortic valve stenosis (AS) shares similarities with the atherosclerotic process but little is known about the effect of the mechanical...     

Parathyroid hormone 1–34 enhances extracellular matrix deposition and organization during flexor tendon repair

Parathyroid hormone (PTH) 1–34 is known to enhance fracture healing. Tendon repair is analogous to bone healing in its dependence on the proliferation and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells, matrix formation, and tissue remodeling.^1,2,3 We hypothesized that PTH 1–34 enhances tendon healing in a flexor digitorum longus (FDL) tendon repair model. C57Bl/6J mice were treated with either intraperitoneal PTH 1–34 or vehicle‐control (PBS). Tendons were harvested at 3–28 days for histology, gene expression, and biomechanical testing. The metatarsophalangeal joint range of motion was reduced 1.5–2‐fold in PTH 1–34 mice compared to control mice. The gliding coefficient, a measure of adhesion formation, was 2–3.5‐fold higher in PTH 1–34 mice. At 14 days post‐repair, the tensile strength was twofold higher in PTH 1–34 specimens, but at 28 days there were no differences. PTH 1–34 mice had increased fibrous tissue deposition that correlated with elevated expression of collagens and fibronectin as seen on quantitative PCR. PTH 1–34 accelerated the deposition of reparative tissue but increased adhesion formation. © 2014 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 33:17–24, 2015.     

Low prevalence of antibodies to glucose-6-phosphate isomerase in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and a spectrum of other chronic autoimmune disorders

OBJECTIVE: Arthritis in the K/BxN mouse model results from pathogenic immunoglobulins that recognize glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (GPI), a glycolytic enzyme residing in the cytoplasm of all cells. Antibodies directed against GPI can, alone, transfer arthritis to healthy recipients. Previous experiments have revealed significant titers of anti-GPI antibodies in the serum of many patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We evaluated the generality of these observations in cohorts of patients with 12 different arthritic and chronic autoimmune diseases and in population-matched healthy control subjects. METHODS: Anti-GPI antibodies were assayed in 811 individual serum samples by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with 2 forms of GPI, recombinant and native. Results were confirmed by immunoblotting. RESULTS: Several patients had significantly elevated anti-GPI antibody titers, but without the prevalence or the specificity reported previously. Only 15% of RA patients had anti-GPI antibodies (range 12-29% in different cohorts), with a higher prevalence in patients with active disease. Psoriatic arthritis, undifferentiated arthritis, and spondylarthropathy patients also displayed anti-GPI antibodies at similar frequencies (12-25%). Similar titers were detected in a proportion (5-10%) of control subjects or patients with Crohn's disease or sarcoidosis. Very high titers were found in rare cases of RA and systemic lupus erythematosus. CONCLUSION: No disease-specific pattern of antibody positivity to GPI was apparent. While the antibody-mediated mechanism at play in the mouse model may exemplify a generic mechanism for some forms of arthritis in humans, GPI itself does not appear to be a target common to the majority of RA patients.     

Mastopexy for breast ptosis: Utility outcomes of population preferences

BACKGROUND:

Breast ptosis can occur with aging, and after weight loss and breastfeeding. Mastopexy is a procedure used to modify the size, contour and elevation of sagging breasts without changing breast volume. To gain more knowledge on the health burden of living with breast ptosis requiring mastectomy, validated measures can be used to compare it with other health states.

OBJECTIVE:

To quantify the health state utility assessment of individuals living with breast ptosis who could benefit from a mastopexy procedure; and to determine whether utility scores vary according to participant demographics.

METHODS:

Utility assessments using a visual analogue scale (VAS), time trade-off (TTO) and standard gamble (SG) methods were used to obtain utility scores for breast ptosis, monocular blindness and binocular blindness from a sample of the general population and medical students. Linear regression and the Student’s t test were used for statistical analysis; P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS:

Mean (± SD) measures for breast ptosis in the 107 volunteers (VAS: 0.80±0.14; TTO: 0.87±0.18; SG: 0.90±0.14) were significantly different (P<0.0001) from the corresponding measures for monocular blindness and binocular blindness. When compared with a sample of the general population, having a medical education demonstrated a statistically significant difference in being less likely to trade years of life and less likely to gamble risk of a procedure such as a mastopexy. Race and sex were not statistically significant independent predictors of risk acceptance.

DISCUSSION:

For the first time, the burden of living with breast ptosis requiring surgical intervention was determined using validated metrics (ie, VAS, TTO and SG). The health burden of living with breast ptosis was found to be comparable with that of breast hypertrophy, unilateral mastectomy, bilateral mastectomy, and cleft lip and palate. Furthermore, breast ptosis was considered to be closer to ‘perfect health’ than monocular blindness, binocular blindness, facial disfigurement requiring face transplantation surgery, unilateral facial paralysis and severe lower extremity lymphedema.

CONCLUSIONS:

Quantifying the health burden of living with breast ptosis requiring mastopexy indicated that is comparable with other breast-related conditions (breast hypertrophy and bilateral mastectomy). Numerical values have been assigned to this health state (VAS: 0.80±0.14; TTO: 0.87±0.18; and SG: 0.90±0.14), which can be used to form comparisons with the health burden of living with other disease states.