Objective assessment of nerve injury after greater saphenous vein stripping.

AIM: The complication of nerve injury after greater saphenous vein stripping for varicosity is subjective, and a method for objective evaluation has never been established. The aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative sensory changes by quantitative assessment of current perception threshold (CPT), and to clarify the relation between CPT and symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2003 and August 2005, 27 limbs in 18 patients were enrolled. Quantitative sensory function was determined through CPT using a Neurometer (Neurotron, Inc., USA), with which saphenous nerve neural fiber selective minimum sensing values against three electrical stimuli (2000, 250, 5 Hz) were measured. CPT measurements were scheduled on the day before the operation, and 2-7 days, 1, 3, and 6 months after the operation. RESULTS: An increase in CPT value of more than 20% or decrease to below 50% compared to the preoperative value with at least two stimuli was defined as CPT abnormality. Subjective symptoms were observed in 13 limbs in the early postoperative period, and 10 limbs showed CPT abnormality. In 6 limbs with a CPT increase over 20% with all three stimuli, neurological symptoms continued for 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: CPT evaluation provides an objective indication of neurological symptoms in the lower limb following varicose vein surgery.     

Management von Postintubationsstenosen bei Kindern

Extubation difficulties after long-term endotracheal intubation in neonates and infants require immediate re-intubation with a somewhat thinner endotracheal tube, continuation of long-term intubation for another 7–14 days with antibiotic and antiphlogistic therapy including antireflux treatment as well as a subtile endoscopic examination. A tracheostomy is not indicated before several attempts of extubation have failed. An anterior cricoid split should be indicated with great care and in premature neonates only. In manifest cicatrical stenoses, subtile endoscopic diagnostics are an essential prerequisite for the choice of surgical method and time of surgery. In rather mild stenoses (grade II), laryngotracheal reconstruction (LTR) with anterior wall cartilage grafting is presently regarded as method of choice. For subglottic stenoses of higher degrees (grade III and IV), partial cricotracheal resection (PCTR) is felt to be the most successful procedure. For all scarred stenoses involving the glottic level, LTR with posterior and anterior wall cartilage grafting appears to be the only suitable treatment. LTR with anterior wall grafting only as well as the PCTR can be performed as a single stage procedure with postoperative long-term intubation on an intensive care unit for one or more days. LTR with posterior and anterior wall grafting requires long-term stenting for several weeks or months depending upon the individual condition. For long-term stenting, our so-called double-tube-technique using a modified Montgomery T silicon tube together with a perforated tracheal cannula has proved to be the safest and least irksome technique.     

Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in childhood brainstem lesions

Background Diagnosis of brainstem lesions in children based on magnetic resonance imaging alone is a challenging problem. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is a noninvasive technique for spatial characterization of biochemical markers in tissues and gives information regarding cell membrane proliferation, neuronal damage, and energy metabolism. Methods We measured the concentrations of biochemical markers in five children with brainstem lesions and evaluated their potential diagnostic significance. Images and spectra were acquired on a 1.5-T imager. The concentrations of N-acetylaspartate, tetramethylamines (e.g., choline), creatine, phosphocreatine, lactate, and lipids were measured within lesions located at the brainstem using Point-resolved spectroscopy sequences. Results Diagnosis based on localized proton spectroscopy included brainstem glioma, brainstem encephalitis, demyelination, dysmyelination secondary to neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF 1), and possible infection or radiation necrosis. In all but one patient, diagnosis was confirmed by biopsy or by clinical follow-up. Conclusions This small sample of patients suggests that MRS is important in the differential diagnosis between proliferative and nonproliferative lesions in patients without neurofibromatosis. Unfortunately, in cases of NF 1, MRS can have a rather misdiagnosis role.