Multi-unit ribozyme-mediated cleavage of bcr-abl mRNA in myeloid leukemias

Chronic myelogenous leukemia is characterized by the Philadelphia chromosome, which at the molecular level results from the fusion of the bcr gene on chromosome 22 and the abl gene on chromosome 9. The bcr-abl fusion gene encodes a novel tyrosine kinase with transforming activity. In this study, we have synthesized a multi-unti ribozyme that targets bcr-abl mRNA. In vitro ribozyme cleavage reactions show increased cleavage efficiency of this multi-unit ribozyme compared with single or double ribozymes. The multiunit ribozyme was then transfected into murine myeloblasts transformed with the bcr-abl gene (32D cells). Ribozyme transfection was accomplished either by liposomes or using follic acid-polylysine as a carrier. Multi-unit ribozyme transfection reduced the level of bcr-abl mRNA 3 logs when transfected via folate receptor-mediated uptake into transformed 32D cells. These results suggest that a multi-unit ribozyme could be an effective therapeutic agent for the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia.     

Cerebrospinal fluid shunts: flow measurements with MR imaging

The authors describe a technique for determination of shunt patency by quantifying cerebrospinal fluid shunt flow rates with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. This method uses a modified clinical sequence that is both sensitive to slow flow perpendicular to the imaging plane and capable of achieving oblique angles with a 4-cm field of view. Velocity-dependent phase images were used to quantify flow rates within the shunt. A preliminary study was performed in seven patients with hydrocephalus and cerebrospinal fluid shunts. Two patients were found to have zero flow in the shunt, while the remaining five had flow rates ranging from 4 to 19 mL/h. Results showed that the measurement of flow rates within the shunt lumen with MR imaging is clinically feasible.     

Hyperfunctioning and nonhyperfunctioning benign adrenal cortical lesions: characterization and comparison with MR imaging

The authors evaluated the potential of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 0.35 T to permit differentiation of nine hyperfunctioning adrenal cortical lesions from 21 nonhyperfunctioning adrenal cortical adenomas. Both qualitative data (visual assessment) and quantitative data (signal intensity ratios, T1, and T2) were used for tissue characterization. With a 2,000/56-100 sequence (repetition time msec/echo time msec), the majority of lesions were visually isointense to liver. Of 34 quantitative measures, only lesion-liver and lesion-kidney intensity ratios at 2,000/150 showed statistically significant differences among nonhyperfunctioning adenomas, aldosterone-producing lesions, and corticosteroid-producing lesions; however, the authors question the significance of these differences because of the abundant noise associated with the 2,000/150 sequence. The results suggest that nonhyperfunctioning adrenal cortical adenomas cannot be distinguished from benign hyperfunctioning cortical lesions with use of MR imaging at 0.35 T.     

Posttransplant renal rejection: comparison of quantitative scintigraphy, US, and MR imaging

Accuracy of ultrasonography (US), quantitative scintigraphy, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in diagnosis of acute renal allograft rejection was studied in 46 patients who underwent renal biopsy. Thirty-three patients had acute rejection; six, cyclosporine nephrotoxicity, as shown by biopsy, clinical findings, and follow-up study; two, acute tubular necrosis; and five, normal biopsy findings and renal function. Accuracy in demonstrating rejection was 72% for US and 75% for scintigraphy, indicating no significant difference between the two. MR imaging was significantly more accurate, reaching a level of 98%. However, accuracy of MR in demonstrating acute tubular necrosis in a larger number of patients is not known, and its accuracy in indicating recurrent glomerulopathy or infectious disease has not been addressed. The definitive role of MR in evaluating posttransplant renal failure is currently not established, but because of its high sensitivity in detecting renal abnormality, MR can be used for cases when results of US or scintigraphy are equivocal or contradict clinical impressions or when biopsy cannot be performed for medical reasons.     

Multimodality imaging of brain structures for stereotactic surgery

An image analysis system was developed for stereotactic neurosurgery that allows the simultaneous display of brain images from different imaging devices obtained in different orientations. The system is based on a stereotactic frame and a microcomputer and features an easy user interface together with point registration and region of interest analysis in three-dimensional space. A dynamic multi-image environment allows for simultaneous display of magnetic resonance, computed tomography, digital subtraction angiography, and positron emission tomography images in multiple windows, adjusted for common coordinates with reference to stereotactic frame fiducial markers. Linkages between images allow information interchange between different modalities and different views: Points and regions defined in one image can be transferred to others, and cursor coordinates in one image can be calculated and dynamically projected in other images. Phantom studies show that the system distortions are minor and that the system is suitable for clinical use. The system provides exceptional advantages over previous imaging procedures for stereotactic surgery.     

Focus groups: issues of analysis and interpretation

Focus groups have become a popular method in nursing research. Their history can be traced back to marketing research methods, but they have also been used in qualitative, ethnographic research. Our study, which used this approach as part of data collection, raised many issues of analysis and interpretation: in particular, the importance of paying attention to the sequence of focus group discussions, the individuals involved, and the social context of the focus group. We conclude that focus groups are not a 'quick and easy' method of collecting data, and that issues of validity and the relationship between focus group data and other data require careful consideration.