Assessment of haemodialysis adequacy by ionic dialysance: intra-patient variability of delivered treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Adequate delivered dose of solute removal (as assessed by urea reduction and calculation of Kt/V) is an important determinant of clinical outcome in chronic haemodialysis (HD) patients. The requirement for multiple blood sampling and efforts taken to minimize the effects of rebound on post-treatment samples ensure Kt/V is measured only intermittently. On-line conductivity monitoring (using sodium flux as a surrogate for urea) allows the repeated non-invasive measurement of Kt/V on each HD treatment. We have studied the accuracy of this method of measuring Kt/V, and the variability of treatment dose delivered to individual patients. METHODS: We prospectively studied 26 established chronic HD patients over 4 weeks (316 treatments). Patients were dialysed using Hospal Integra dialysis monitors, equipped with Diascan modules to measure Kt/V. Data were downloaded automatically to a central computer server. Urea reduction was measured (once a week) by a two-pool calculation using 30 min post-treatment sampling. RESULTS: Treatment time, Q(B) and modality were fully delivered in all treatments analysed (97% of total). Kt/V measured by ionic dialysance (Kt/V(ID)) correlated highly with that derived from measurement of urea reduction (R(2)=0.92, P<0.0001). Kt/V(ID) underestimated urea-based Kt/V by a mean of only 1.5% (95% CI 0.18-2.9%). Kt/V(ID) varied greatly within individual patients with a mean CV of 0.13+/-0.10 (95% CI 0.05-0.3). If a Kt/V(ID) of 1.0 is considered 'adequate', 55% of the patients had variations that would have potentially altered their status as being adequately or inadequately dialysed, as the range of Kt/V readings cross that point during the study period. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, Kt/V(ID) seems to be an accurate and readily obtained measure of adequacy. Substantial variation in Kt/V implies repeated measures (ideally for all treatments) are necessary to gain a true picture of the mean treatment dose being delivered to patients.     

Hours worked and patient visits provided by dentists in Australia

Background

The aim was to examine the numbers of hours worked and patient visits provided by age and gender of dentists in Australia, and compare with previous estimates to describe trends.

Methods

Data were collected from a random sample (N = 2961) of Australian dentists. Private sector dentists working in clinical practise were included in the analysis.

Results

The response rate was 49% (N = 1345 dentists). Hours per year worked and number of patient visits per year were lower for dentists aged 65 years and older compared with younger dentists, and were higher for male compared with female dentists aged 35–45 to 55–64 years. Hours per year worked were lower in 2013–2014 than reported in 2009–2010, but the number of patient visits in 2013–2014 was similar to the previously reported estimate from 2009–2010.

Conclusions

Hours worked and visits provided were only lower among older dentists aged 65 years or more. Male dentists tend to work more hours per year and provide more patient visits per year than female dentists. Over the last decade, Australian dentists maintained a stable output of visits per year despite a trend towards fewer hours worked per year.