Analysis of nonpenetrating clips versus sutures for arterial venous graft anastomosis

The use of nonpenetrating clips (NPC) for vascular anastomosis is quickly becoming accepted. Studies attest to decreased anastomotic time, comparable patency rates, and decreased blood loss. Few human studies on the use of NPC have been done to date. The purpose of this study was to evaluate primary patency rates, operative time, and complications associated with NPC compared to those with standard sutures for arterial venous graft (AVG). We retrospectively reviewed the clinical course of 82 patients with a mean age of 45 years (range, 22 to 87) from February 1996 to July 1999. All patients underwent upper extremity AVG construction. The procedures were performed at a single institution, by a single, well-experienced surgeon who has extensive experience with NPC. Primary patency rates, operative time, and complications were analyzed. Overall thrombotic incidence of AVG when NPC were used (27/48, 56%) was similar to that of sutures (17/34, 50%). Thrombotic incidence within the first year was similar as well (23/48, 48% and 13/34, 38%). The mean time to primary thrombosis was similar in both groups (6.9 and 6.8 months). The operative time required to construct an AVG with NPC (83 min) was significantly less than that with sutures (96 min) (p = 0.015). There was no significant difference in incidence of graft infection or pseudoaneurysm formation. NPC for AVG reduced operative time and resulted in primary patency and complication rates similar to those associated with use of sutures. The mean time to primary thrombosis was similar for both groups. Our findings suggest an intimai hyperplastic response of a similar nature resulting in thrombosis of both NPC and sutured AVGs. Presented at the Twenty-fifth Annual Meeting of the Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, June 10, 2000.     

Characteristics and outcomes of recurrent atrial fibrillation after prior failed pulmonary vein isolation

Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology - The mechanisms for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) catheter ablation are unclear. Non-PV organized...     

The Therapeutic Use of Analgesics in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: A Literature Review and Evidence-Based Recommendations

Context:

Pain management in cirrhotic patients is a major clinical challenge for medical professionals. Unfortunately there are no concrete guidelines available regarding the administration of analgesics in patients with liver cirrhosis. In this review we aimed to summarize the available literature and suggest appropriate evidence-based recommendations regarding to administration of these drugs.

Evidence Acquisition:

An indexed MEDLINE search was conducted in July 2014, using keywords “analgesics”, “hepatic impairment”, “cirrhosis”, “acetaminophen or paracetamol”, “NSAIDs or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs”, “opioid” for the period of 2004 to 2014. All randomized clinical trials, case series, case report and meta-analysis studies with the above mentioned contents were included in review process. In addition, unpublished information from the Food and Drug Administration are included as well.

Results:

Paracetamol is safe in patients with chronic liver disease but a reduced dose of 2-3 g/d is recommended for long-term use. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are best avoided because of risk of renal impairment, hepatorenal syndrome, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Most opioids can have deleterious effects in patients with cirrhosis. They have an increased risk of toxicity and hepatic encephalopathy. They should be administrated with lower and less frequent dosing in these patients and be avoided in patients with a history of encephalopathy or addiction to any substance.

Conclusions:

No evidence-based guidelines exist on the use of analgesics in patients with liver disease and cirrhosis. As a result pain management in these patients generates considerable misconception among health care professionals, leading under-treatment of pain in this population. Providing concrete guidelines toward the administration of these agents will lead to more efficient and safer pain management in this setting.     

Interreader and intermodality reliability of standard anteroposterior radiograph and magnetic resonance imaging in detection and classification of lumbosacral transitional vertebra

Background contextDifferent types of lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) are classified based on the relationship of the transverse process of the last lumbar vertebra to the sacrum. The Ferguson view (30° angled anteroposterior [AP] radiograph) is supposed to have a sufficient interreader reliability in classification of LSTV, but is not routinely available. Standard AP radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are often available, but their reliability in detection and classification of LSTV is unknown.PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the interreader reliability of detection and classification of LSTV with standard AP radiographs and report its accuracy by use of intermodality statistics compared with MRI as the gold standard.Study design/settingRetrospective case control study.Patient sampleA total of 155 subjects (93 cases: LSTV type 2 or higher; 62 controls).Outcome measuresInterreader reliability in detection and classification of LSTV using standard AP radiographs and coronal MRI as well as accuracy of radiographs compared with MRI.MethodsAfter institutional review board approval, coronal MRI scans and conventional AP radiographs of 155 subjects (93 LSTV type 2 or higher and 62 controls) were retrospectively reviewed by two independent, blinded readers and classified according to the Castellvi classification. Interreader reliability was assessed using kappa statistics for detection of an LSTV and identification of all subtypes (six variants; 1: no LSTV or type I, 2: LSTV type 2a, 3: LSTV type 2b, 4: LSTV type 3a, 5: LSTV type 3b, 6: LSTV type 4) for MRI scans and standard AP radiographs. Further, accuracy and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for standard AP radiographs to detect and classify LSTV using MRI as the gold standard.ResultsThe interreader reliability was at most moderate for the detection (k=0.53) and fair for classification (wk=0.39) of LSTV in standard AP radiograph. However, the interreader reliability was very good for detection (k=0.93) and classification (wk=0.83) of LSTV in MRI. The accuracy and positive and negative predictive values of standard AP radiograph were 76% to 84%, 72% to 86%, and 79% to 81% for the detection and 53% to 58%, 51% to 76%, and 49% to 55% for the classification of LSTV, respectively.ConclusionStandard AP radiographs are insufficient to detect or classify LSTV. Coronal MRI scans, however, are highly reliable for classification of LSTV.     

MTHFR gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis based on 16 studies

Clinical Rheumatology - Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common autoimmune rheumatic disease, in which an epigenetic implication in the disease etiopathogenesis has been noted. Here in this...     

Vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphism and risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA): systematic review and meta-analysis

Clinical Rheumatology - Vitamin D is involved in immune system modulation as well as in calcium and bone homeostasis, hence plays a role in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) etiopathogenesis. A bulk of...