Estimation of pulse pressure variation and cardiac output in patients having major abdominal surgery: a comparison between a mobile application for snapshot pulse wave analysis and invasive pulse wave analysis

Pulse pressure variation (PPV) and cardiac output (CO) can guide perioperative fluid management. Capstesia (Galenic App, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain) is a mobile application for snapshot pulse wave analysis (PWAsnap) and estimates PPV and CO using pulse wave analysis of a snapshot of the arterial blood pressure waveform displayed on any patient monitor. We evaluated the PPV and CO measurement performance of PWAsnap in adults having major abdominal surgery. In a prospective study, we simultaneously measured PPV and CO using PWAsnap installed on a tablet computer (PPV_PWAsnap, CO_PWAsnap) and using invasive internally calibrated pulse wave analysis (ProAQT; Pulsion Medical Systems, Feldkirchen, Germany; PPV_ProAQT, CO_ProAQT). We determined the diagnostic accuracy of PPV_PWAsnap in comparison to PPV_ProAQT according to three predefined PPV categories and by computing Cohen’s kappa coefficient. We compared CO_ProAQT and CO_PWAsnap using Bland-Altman analysis, the percentage error, and four quadrant plot/concordance rate analysis to determine trending ability. We analyzed 190 paired PPV and CO measurements from 38 patients. The overall diagnostic agreement between PPV_PWAsnap and PPV_ProAQT across the three predefined PPV categories was 64.7% with a Cohen’s kappa coefficient of 0.45. The mean (±?standard deviation) of the differences between CO_PWAsnap and CO_ProAQT was 0.6?±?1.3 L min^??1 (95% limits of agreement 3.1 to ??1.9 L min^??1) with a percentage error of 48.7% and a concordance rate of 45.1%. In adults having major abdominal surgery, PPV_PWAsnap moderately agrees with PPV_ProAQT. The absolute and trending agreement between CO_PWAsnap with CO_ProAQT is poor. Technical improvements are needed before PWAsnap can be recommended for hemodynamic monitoring.

     

Analgesia via blockade of NGF/TrkA signaling does not influence fracture healing in mice

Abatement of fracture‐related pain is important in patient welfare. However, the frequently used non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs are considered to impair fracture healing through blockade of cyclooxygenase‐2. An alternative for fracture‐related pain treatment may be blockade of nerve growth factor (NGF)/neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor type 1 (TrkA) signaling. Because the effect of blocking this signal‐pathway on bone healing has not been extensively investigated, we addressed this issue by applying neutralizing antibodies that target NGF and TrkA, respectively, in a mouse fracture model. Mice with a knock‐in for human TrkA underwent femur osteotomy and were randomly allocated to phosphate‐buffered‐saline, anti‐NGF‐antibody, or anti‐TrkA‐antibody treatment. The analgesic effect of the antibodies was determined from the activity and the ground reaction force of the operated limb. The effect of antibody administration on fracture healing was assessed by histomorphometry, micro‐computed tomography, and biomechanics. NGF/TrkA‐signaling blockade had no negative effect on fracture healing as callus formation and maturation were not altered. Mice treated with anti‐TrkA antibody displayed significantly greater activity on post‐operative day 2 compared to PBS treatment indicating effective analgesia. Our data indicate, that blockade of NGF/TrkA signaling via specific neutralizing antibodies for pain reduction during fracture healing does not influence fracture healing. © 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 33:1235–1241, 2015.