OBJECTIVE
To test the safety and efficacy of exenatide once weekly (EQW) compared with metformin (MET), pioglitazone (PIO), and sitagliptin (SITA) over 26 weeks, in suboptimally treated (diet and exercise) drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
Patients were randomized to subcutaneous (SC) EQW 2.0 mg + oral placebo (
n = 248), MET 2,000 mg/day + SC placebo (
n = 246), PIO 45 mg/day + SC placebo (
n = 163), or SITA 100 mg/day + SC placebo (
n = 163) for 26 weeks. MET and PIO therapies were increased to maximum-tolerated dosages. Injections with EQW or placebo were administered weekly, while oral medication or placebo was administered daily.
RESULTS
Baseline characteristics were as follows: 59% men, 67% Caucasian, mean age 54 years, HbA
1c 8.5%, fasting serum glucose 9.9 mmol/L, body weight 87.0 kg, and diabetes duration 2.7 years. HbA
1c reductions (%) at 26 weeks (least-squares means) with EQW versus MET, PIO, and SITA were −1.53 vs. −1.48 (
P = 0.620), −1.63 (
P = 0.328), and −1.15 (
P < 0.001), respectively. Weight changes (kg) were −2.0 vs. −2.0 (
P = 0.892), +1.5 (
P < 0.001), and −0.8 (
P < 0.001), respectively. Common adverse events were as follows: EQW, nausea (11.3%) and diarrhea (10.9%); MET, diarrhea (12.6%) and headache (12.2%); PIO, nasopharyngitis (8.6%) and headache (8.0%); and SIT, nasopharyngitis (9.8%) and headache (9.2%). Minor (confirmed) hypoglycemia was rarely reported. No major hypoglycemia occurred.
CONCLUSIONS
EQW was noninferior to MET but not PIO and superior to SITA with regard to HbA
1c reduction at 26 weeks. Of the agents studied, EQW and MET provided similar improvements in glycemic control along with the benefit of weight reduction and no increased risk of hypoglycemia.The 2009 consensus algorithm from the American Diabetes Association (ADA)/European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) recommends lifestyle changes and metformin (MET) as the initial (tier one, well-validated) treatment at diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (
1). Common adjunctive treatments not associated with an increased risk of hypoglycemia when used as monotherapy include the thiazolidinedione, pioglitazone (PIO), the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin (SITA), and the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide twice daily (BID) (
2–
5). PIO and exenatide BID are included in the second tier (less well-validated) of preferred agents in the ADA/EASD algorithm. SITA is not indentified, but may be an appropriate choice for selected patients (
1). These agents, commonly used only in MET-intolerant patients as monotherapy, have unique risks, benefits, and mechanisms.Effective and safe monotherapy treatment options for patients unable to tolerate MET are limited. In the United States, exenatide BID is indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes. A new formulation of exenatide (exenatide once weekly [EQW]) has been shown to result in greater improvements in glycemic control, with no increased risk of hypoglycemia and similar weight reduction compared with exenatide BID (
6,
7). This randomized trial (Diabetes Therapy Utilization: Researching Changes in A1C, Weight and Other Factors Through Intervention with Exenatide Once-Weekly [DURATION-4]) directly compared the safety and efficacy of EQW monotherapy versus MET, PIO, and SITA monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes who were suboptimally treated with diet and exercise but naive to antihyperglycemic drugs.
相似文献