Deliberate hypotension in orthopedic surgery reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE: To determine if deliberate hypotension decreases blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery, a systematic review of all randomized trials addressing this issue was undertaken. METHODS: Electronic databases, citations lists and review articles were searched for potential articles. Relevant articles met the following inclusion criteria: English language, humans undergoing orthopedic surgery, deliberate hypotension used by any method, intraoperative blood loss measured as an outcome, and the trial methodology being randomized and controlled. Four outcomes were analyzed, including estimated blood loss, blood transfused, surgery duration, and quality of the surgical field. For all analyses, the random-effects model was used. RESULTS: Seventeen articles met the inclusion criteria. The surgeries studied included total hip arthroplasty (seven), orthognathic surgery (eight), total knee arthroplasty (one) and spinal fusion (one). A total of 636 patients were randomized across all studies. For blood loss, the overall weighted mean difference favoured treatment, with a savings of about 287 mL of blood [95% confidence interval (CI): -447, -127]. The mean differences also showed a statistically significant benefit for deliberate hypotension in reducing transfusion requirements (-667 mL of blood transfused; 95% CI: -963, -370). Deliberate hypotension was not shown to reduce the duration of surgery (-1.9 min of surgery; 95% CI: -7.2, 3.5) or improve surgical conditions (surgical field quality rating -0.5; 95% CI: -1.1, 0.2). CONCLUSION: This review provides some support for the use of deliberate hypotension in reducing blood loss and transfusion requirements in orthopedic surgery, but these results are tempered by the small sample sizes and poor methodological quality of published studies.     

Chronobiological characteristics of postoperative pain: Diurnal variation of both static and dynamic pain and effects of analgesic therapy

BACKGROUND: Previous postoperative investigations report morning peaks in analgesic administration. However, few studies have examined diurnal variation of both pain and analgesic consumption and little is known about dynamic pain in this context. METHODS: The diurnal pattern of postoperative pain is described using pain intensity and analgesic consumption data from a recently published hysterectomy trial. RESULTS: In the presence of patient-controlled analgesia with morphine, pain at 8 a.m. was significantly higher (P<0.05) than at noon, 4 p.m. or 8 p.m. on postoperative day one (for rest pain and pain evoked by sitting, forced expiration and cough) and on postoperative day two (for pain evoked by forced expiration and cough only). This temporal pattern was observed both with and without the co-administration of non-opioid analgesics (gabapentin and/or rofecoxib). Morphine use during the four hours preceding 8 a.m. on either postoperative day was not significantly lower than any of the other corresponding time intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Based on data from our post-hysterectomy analgesic clinical trial, static and dynamic pain in the morning appears to be more intense than pain later in the day. This pattern was observed in the presence of substantial nocturnal morphine use. Based on these and other previous observations, specifically designed investigations are needed to better characterize the clinical, neurohormonal and neurophysiological features of postoperative circadian pain variation - including pain during sleeping hours. If the above observations are replicated, future study of nocturnal sustained-release opioids as well as time-shifting the administration of non-opioid co-analgesic drugs to the very early morning may be warranted.