Nonspecific immunity in pregnancy: monocyte surface Fcγ receptor expression and function

The state of pregnancy is an immunological enigma during which the body must prevent rejection of the antigenically foreign fetus while at the same time maintain sufficient maternal host defense mechanisms to combat infection. Although most studies on the immunology of pregnancy focus on immune suppression, several studies have shown an increase in nonspecific host defense, which is postulated to be a compensatory mechanism for decreased specific immunity during pregnancy. Studies in this laboratory have shown that monocyte surface FcγRI (CD64) and FcγRII (CD32) expression progressively increase throughout pregnancy, while surface MHC class II expression remains unchanged. Functional studies revealed that the number of phagocytic monocytes which could be isolated from pregnant women was increased. These cells exhibited an increased capacity to ingest IgG-opsonized human erythrocytes. This study shows for the first time that monocyte surface FcγR expression and FcγR-mediated functions are increased during pregnancy. These results support the hypothesis that nonspecific immunity as represented by FcγR expression and function is increased during pregnancy.     

Is Coronary Graft Doppler More Sensitive for Indiviual Graft Flows Than TEE During CABG Surgery?

Abstract    In this case report we describe a situation where despite a normal TEE exam immediately postcardiopulmonary bypass, there was no flow in the left internal mammary artery graft to the left anterior descending artery. This was picked up by coronary Doppler and subsequently repaired.     

Changes to osteoporosis prevalence according to method of risk assessment.

The impact of clinical risk factor-based absolute risk methods on the prevalence of high risk for osteoporotic fracture is unknown. We applied absolute risk methods to 6646 subjects and found that the prevalence of elderly women deemed to be at high risk increased substantially, whereas the overall prevalence was highly dependent on the threshold used to designate high risk. INTRODUCTION: Many groups have advocated using absolute risk methods that incorporate clinical risk factors to target patients for osteoporosis therapy. We examined how the application of such absolute risk classification systems influences the prevalence of those considered to be at high risk for osteoporotic fracture and compared these systems to one based solely on BMD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using 6646 subjects from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos), a prospective, randomly selected, population-based cohort, we assessed three different systems for determining prevalence of high risk for osteoporotic fracture: a BMD-based system; a simplified risk factor system incorporating age, sex, BMD, and two clinical risk factors; and a comprehensive system, incorporating age, sex, BMD, and seven clinical risk factors. The 10-year absolute risks of incident fragility fracture were compared across systems using three different high-risk thresholds. RESULTS: The prevalence of a T score < or = -2.5 was 18.8% (95% CI: 17.7-19.9%) in women and 3.9% (95% CI: 3.0-4.7%) in men. Using a 15% 10-year risk of fracture threshold, the prevalence of women at high risk increased to 46.9% (95% CI: 45.4-48.4) and 42.5% (95% CI: 41.1-43.9) when the comprehensive and simplified risk factor classification systems were used, respectively. Using a 25% 10-year absolute risk threshold, the prevalence of high risk was similar to that of the BMD-based system, whereas the 20% threshold gave intermediate rates. All thresholds analyzed resulted in an increased prevalence of older women at high risk for fracture, whereas only the 15% 10-year risk of fracture threshold resulted in an increase in the prevalence of men at high risk. CONCLUSIONS: The application of risk factor-based systems results in an increased prevalence of older women at high risk. The prevalence of individuals at high risk may increase with changes to the methods used to determine those who are eligible for therapy. These data have important implications for the pattern of care and costs of treating osteoporotic fractures.     

Adenomyosis:common and uncommon manifestations on sonography and magnetic resonance imaging.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this presentation is to show the imaging findings of the common and uncommon variants of adenomyosis as seen on sonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: A 3-year database search was performed to identify women who had pelvic sonography and pelvic MRI within a 6-month interval. Images of these cases were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Eighty women were identified. Adenomyosis was diagnosed on MRI, which was used as the reference standard, in 45 of these women. The correct diagnosis was made on sonography in 73% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of the spectrum of imaging features of adenomyosis is important to use sonography effectively for diagnosing this entity and to help avoid misdiagnosis.     

Impact of smoking on cancer stage at diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Studies evaluating the relationship between smoking and cancer spread are limited. METHODS: We studied the relationship between cancer stage at diagnosis (local, regional, or metastatic) and smoking history (current, previous, or nonsmoker). For lung cancer, patterns of spread were also studied. RESULTS: In a tumor registry for eastern North Dakota, northwestern Minnesota, and northern South Dakota, 11,716 cases were identified from 1986 to 2001. Current smokers (relative risk [RR], 2.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.93 to 2.32; P <.001) and previous smokers (RR, 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.42 to 1.72; P <.001) had an increased risk of metastatic disease at diagnosis. Current smokers (RR, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.29 to 1.51; P <.001), but not previous smokers, also had an increased risk of regional disease. An increase in metastatic disease was most evident for prostate cancer (RR, 1.53; P =.003). An increase in regional disease was most evident for head and neck (RR, 3.53; P <.001), prostate (RR, 1.83; P =.030), and breast cancer (RR, 1.22; P =.005). Compared with previous smokers, current smokers with metastatic lung cancer were more likely to have involvement of the brain (33.6% v 23.0%; P =.004), bone marrow, adrenal gland, and pericardium (24.7% v 15.9%; P =.004). CONCLUSION: Previous or current smoking is a risk factor for increased cancer stage in a wide range of malignancies. Further study is required to determine whether this association is causal.